Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Core Interpretative Principle

CPET interpretation must rely on an integrative approach that identifies clusters of abnormal responses rather than single measurements, as exercise limitation is multifactorial and algorithms based on isolated variables are inadequate and prone to error. 1

The greatest diagnostic potential comes from the integrated use of multiple variables, not from any single measurement, even though some variables are more important than others. 1

Systematic Interpretation Framework

Step 1: Establish Clinical Context

Before analyzing any CPET data, gather the following specific information:

Clinical diagnosis and reason for testing (dyspnea evaluation, preoperative assessment, disability determination, exercise prescription) 1
Medications, particularly β-blockers (which blunt heart rate response), anticoagulants, and bronchodilators 1
Baseline testing results: pulmonary function tests, chest X-ray, ECG, echocardiography, hemoglobin level, carboxyhemoglobin 1
Skeletal abnormalities of lower extremities that may limit exercise 1
Physical activity level and occupational exposures 1

This clinical profile is mandatory for meaningful physiologic-clinical correlation and prevents misinterpretation. 1

Step 2: Assess Test Quality and Effort

Determine whether maximal effort was achieved by evaluating:

Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.10-1.15 at peak exercise 1
Peak heart rate ≥85-90% of age-predicted maximum 1
Clinical signs: diaphoresis, obvious exhaustion, inability to continue 1
Reason for stopping: leg fatigue, dyspnea, chest pain, ECG changes 1

Without maximal effort, interpretation of peak values is unreliable. 1

Step 3: Analyze Key Variables Using Graphical Display

Present data in standardized graphical format showing both submaximal and peak exercise responses, with reference values overlaid for comparison. 1

Essential Plots to Generate:

VO₂ vs. time (with RER overlay) - identifies anaerobic threshold and peak VO₂ 1
VCO₂ vs. time - confirms metabolic response patterns 1
VO₂ vs. work rate - assesses exercise efficiency (normal slope ~10 mL/min/watt) 1
Ventilation (VE) vs. VCO₂ - evaluates ventilatory efficiency and dead space 1
Tidal volume (VT) vs. VE - identifies breathing pattern abnormalities 1
Heart rate and O₂ pulse vs. VO₂ - characterizes cardiovascular response 1
End-tidal CO₂ (PetCO₂) and O₂ (PetO₂) vs. time - detects gas exchange abnormalities 2

Step 4: Identify Anaerobic Threshold (AT)

Use a cluster of variables to estimate AT, not a single measurement, as relying on one index is inadequate. 1

The AT represents the VO₂ at which the transition from moderate to heavy-intensity exercise occurs. 1

Variables for AT Determination:

V-slope method: inflection point where VCO₂ increases disproportionately to VO₂ 1
Ventilatory equivalents: systematic increase in VE/VO₂ without increase in VE/VCO₂ 1
End-tidal gases: increase in PetO₂ without decrease in PetCO₂ 1
RER: sustained increase above 1.0 1

A low AT (<40% predicted VO₂max) indicates abnormal oxygen delivery to muscles or intrinsic muscle abnormalities. 1

Step 5: Compare Results to Reference Values

Select appropriate reference equations based on:

Exercise modality (cycle ergometer vs. treadmill - cycle values are typically 10-15% lower) 1
Patient demographics (age, sex, height, weight) 1
Population characteristics (sedentary vs. active) 1

Key Normal Values at Peak Exercise:

Peak VO₂: ≥80% predicted 1
Peak heart rate: ≥85% predicted maximum 1
Heart rate reserve: <15 beats/min below predicted maximum 1
Breathing reserve: VE <70-85% of maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1
O₂ pulse: ≥80% predicted 1
VE/VCO₂ slope: <30 (lower is better) 2
Oxygen saturation: ≥88% throughout exercise 1

Step 6: Identify Patterns of Limitation

Recognize that exercise limitation is multifactorial; identify the predominant pattern by analyzing clusters of responses. 1

Cardiovascular Limitation Pattern:

Low peak VO₂ (<80% predicted) 1
Low AT (<40% predicted VO₂max) 1
Low O₂ pulse (<80% predicted or plateau) 1
High heart rate reserve depleted (>85% predicted maximum) 1
Normal or high breathing reserve (VE <70% MVV) 1
Normal oxygen saturation 1

Pulmonary Limitation Pattern:

Low peak VO₂ 1
Low breathing reserve (VE >85% MVV) 1
Oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ <88%) during exercise 1
High VE/VCO₂ slope (>34) or elevated dead space 1, 2
Preserved heart rate reserve 1
Flow-volume loop showing expiratory flow limitation 1

Deconditioning/Peripheral Limitation Pattern:

Low peak VO₂ 1
Low AT 1
Normal O₂ pulse 1
High heart rate reserve preserved 1
High breathing reserve 1
Normal oxygen saturation 1
Early lactate accumulation 1

Pulmonary Vascular Disease Pattern:

Low peak VO₂ 1
Low AT 1
High VE/VCO₂ slope (>45) 2
Low PetCO₂ (<30 mmHg at AT) 2
Oxygen desaturation 1
High dead space/tidal volume ratio 1

Step 7: Answer Four Fundamental Questions

A comprehensive CPET interpretation must address: 1

To what extent is the system constrained? (quantify peak VO₂ as % predicted) 1
How is limitation perceived? (dyspnea vs. leg fatigue vs. chest pain) 1
Are metabolic requirements met? (assess AT, lactate response, oxygen delivery) 1
What is the cost of meeting requirements? (ventilatory efficiency, cardiac output, oxygen extraction) 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never rely on a single variable to determine the mechanism of exercise limitation, as this leads to interpretative error, particularly in early disease or combined cardiac-pulmonary conditions. 1
Do not ignore trending phenomena from submaximal to peak exercise; the pattern of change is often more informative than isolated peak values. 1
Avoid interpreting peak VO₂ without confirming maximal effort, as submaximal tests yield unreliable conclusions about exercise capacity. 1
Do not overlook medication effects: β-blockers blunt heart rate response and may mask cardiovascular limitation. 1
Recognize that algorithms have not been clinically validated and should serve as guides, not rigid decision trees. 1
Never interpret CPET in isolation from clinical context, baseline testing, and patient symptoms. 1

Advanced Considerations

When standard CPET is insufficient, consider complex CPET with additional measurements: 2

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (impedance cardiography, inert gas rebreathing) 2
Near-infrared spectroscopy of working muscles to assess oxygen extraction 2
Exercise echocardiography to evaluate valvular function and pulmonary pressures 2
Arterial blood gas sampling when oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry is unreliable or dead space quantification is needed 2
Esophageal balloon manometry to measure work of breathing 2

These additions are particularly valuable when the mechanism of limitation remains unclear after standard CPET. 2

How should I interpret a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in detail?

Help us tailor your experience