Why is the perihilar region significant on a chest radiograph?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Why the Perihilar Region is Significant on Chest Radiography

Critical Anatomical and Diagnostic Importance

The perihilar region is significant on chest radiography because it contains the pulmonary arteries, bronchi, lymphatics, and central lung interstitium—structures whose abnormalities can indicate serious pathology including lung cancer, pulmonary hypertension, lymphadenopathy, and infectious diseases. 1, 2

Key Anatomical Structures and Their Clinical Relevance

The perihilar region encompasses several vital structures that must be systematically evaluated:

  • Pulmonary vasculature: The right descending pulmonary artery diameter >15 mm in women (>16 mm in men) at the hilum indicates pulmonary hypertension with 93% sensitivity and 88% specificity 3
  • Bronchial structures: The trachea and main bronchi course through this region, and deviation or narrowing suggests mass effect or mediastinal pathology 1, 2
  • Lymphatic system: The peribronchovascular region contains intercommunicating prelymphatic spaces, lymphatics, and lymph nodes that enlarge with malignancy or infection 4
  • Central lung interstitium: This includes collagen bundles and bronchial arteries that can be affected by diffuse lung diseases 4, 5

Detection of Malignancy

The perihilar region is a critical area for detecting lung cancer:

  • Mediastinal lymphadenopathy: Enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes visible on chest radiography may indicate metastatic disease, though chest radiography is generally insensitive for detecting mediastinal lymph node involvement 6
  • Perihilar linear atelectasis: Thick perihilar linear atelectasis (>5.5 mm) is a novel diagnostic sign suggesting subsegmental bronchial obstruction from primary lung cancer, with 16 of 19 patients (84%) with this finding having malignancy 7
  • Mass lesions: Perihilar masses or consolidation can represent primary lung cancer, though tuberculosis and other conditions can mimic malignancy 8

Vascular Pathology Assessment

The perihilar region provides crucial information about pulmonary vascular disease:

  • Pulmonary hypertension: Main pulmonary artery enlargement (>35 mm from midline to left lateral border) occurs in 96% of pulmonary hypertension cases, with chest radiography having 96.9% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity for moderate to severe disease 3
  • Vascular pruning: Central pulmonary artery enlargement with rapid peripheral tapering indicates elevated pulmonary pressures 3

Systematic Evaluation Approach

The American College of Radiology recommends a structured approach to perihilar assessment:

  • Trace the trachea and main bronchi for deviation or narrowing that might indicate mass effect 1, 2
  • Evaluate the aortopulmonary window and hilar regions for abnormal masses or lymphadenopathy 1
  • Assess mediastinal width and contour for widening suggesting aortic pathology or lymphadenopathy 1, 2
  • Measure hilar vessel diameters when pulmonary hypertension is suspected 3

Common Pitfalls and Limitations

Critical considerations when evaluating the perihilar region:

  • Chest radiography has limited sensitivity: It is insensitive for detecting mediastinal lymph node involvement in lung cancer and may miss early or small lesions 6
  • Normal radiographs do not exclude pathology: If clinical suspicion remains high for malignancy, pulmonary hypertension, or other conditions, proceed to CT imaging 1, 3
  • Rotation artifacts: Improper patient positioning can mimic or obscure true perihilar pathology including masses and lymphadenopathy 1
  • Multiple disease presentations: Peribronchovascular diseases can appear as diffuse thickening, masses, ground-glass opacities, or cysts, requiring integration with clinical features 4

When to Pursue Advanced Imaging

CT chest with contrast is indicated when:

  • Abnormal or equivocal chest radiograph findings require further characterization 1, 2
  • Perihilar masses or lymphadenopathy are detected, as CT is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis 3, 8
  • Clinical suspicion persists despite normal chest radiography, particularly for lung cancer in high-risk patients 6, 7
  • Pulmonary hypertension is suspected with normal or equivocal radiography, though transthoracic echocardiography should also be performed 3

References

Guideline

Chest Radiograph Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Chest X-ray Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Right Hilum Enhancement on Chest X-Ray

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Approach to Peribronchovascular Disease on CT.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What are the causes of bronchovascular issues?
Does the minor linear atelectasis at the left lung base require further imaging?
What is the next step in managing a patient with continued bronchovascular marking in bilateral lungs, a well-visualized left costophrenic angle, possible left pleural fusion, and possible pleural thickening on chest x-ray?
What is the management plan for a patient with linear atelectatic bands in bilateral lower lobes on CT (Computed Tomography) thorax scan without signs of infection?
What is the appropriate management for a patient with a 2.9 cm x 1.5 cm perihilar nodule?
What non‑invasive cardiac testing is recommended for a 33‑year‑old man with hypertension and gastro‑esophageal reflux disease who presents with intermittent chest pain, T‑wave inversions in leads V3‑V6, tachycardia, negative serial cardiac troponins, a normal resting echocardiogram with left ventricular ejection fraction approximately 56 %, and low low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol?
What is the next step in management after a normal chest radiograph in a patient with latent tuberculosis infection?
Should I treat an adult with an asymptomatic urine culture positive for Escherichia coli and a normal urinalysis?
In an advanced‑age patient with severe protein‑calorie malnutrition, hyponatremia, limited oral intake (tea‑and‑toast diet), no active malignancy, and poor short‑term prognosis, what is the most appropriate management regarding goals of care, DNR/DNI status, and palliative versus aggressive interventions?
What is the appropriate management for an 89‑year‑old woman who tests positive for respiratory syncytial virus?
Are there any clinically significant drug interactions or dosing adjustments needed when fluticasone nasal spray (Flonase) and guaifenesin (Mucinex) are coadministered in an adult patient?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.