What does a positive Neer test and a positive Hawkins‑Kennedy test indicate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What Positive Neer and Hawkins Tests Indicate

Positive Neer and Hawkins tests indicate subacromial impingement syndrome, which encompasses a spectrum of pathology from subacromial bursitis to partial or complete rotator cuff tears. 1, 2

Primary Clinical Interpretation

Both tests detect subacromial impingement as a pathogenic process by reproducing mechanical compression of the supraspinatus tendon against the coracoacromial arch during specific shoulder movements. 1, 2, 3

Test Mechanics and Performance

  • The Hawkins test elicits pain with forcible internal rotation while the arm is passively flexed forward at 90 degrees, demonstrating 92% sensitivity but only 25% specificity for impingement. 1

  • The Neer test elicits pain with full forward flexion between 70 and 120 degrees while stabilizing the scapula, showing 88% sensitivity but only 33% specificity for impingement. 1, 2

  • Recent validation confirms the Neer test has 79% sensitivity, 63% specificity, and 76% overall diagnostic accuracy when compared against MRI as the gold standard. 4

Critical Diagnostic Limitations

These tests are highly sensitive screening tools but lack specificity—meaning they effectively rule out impingement when negative but cannot confirm the specific underlying pathology when positive. 1, 2, 5

Understanding Test Performance

  • The combined negative predictive value is 96% for bursitis and 90% for rotator cuff tears when both tests are negative, making them excellent for exclusion. 5

  • Positive predictive values are low (not much higher than pretest probability), meaning a positive test requires additional diagnostic workup. 5

  • Specificity ranges from 25-59% for Hawkins and 33-53% for Neer, indicating many false positives occur. 2

Differential Diagnosis Requiring Imaging

When either test is positive, the following conditions must be distinguished through imaging:

  • Subacromial bursitis presents with inflammatory changes visible on ultrasound or MRI. 1, 5

  • Rotator cuff tendinopathy shows tendon thickening and degeneration without discontinuity on imaging. 6

  • Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears demonstrate the highest sensitivity (90%) with the Neer test but still require MRI confirmation. 4

  • Full-thickness rotator cuff tears require definitive imaging for surgical planning. 6

Recommended Diagnostic Algorithm

When either test is positive, proceed with imaging rather than assuming a specific diagnosis. 6, 2

Imaging Sequence

  • Obtain plain radiographs first to exclude bony pathology including acromial morphology, though they cannot visualize tendon tears. 6

  • Use ultrasound as the initial soft tissue imaging modality for suspected full-thickness tears, with 91% sensitivity and 88% specificity. 6

  • Order MRI without contrast when diagnosis remains unclear or surgical planning is needed, providing 95% sensitivity and specificity. 6

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume a positive test indicates a structural tear requiring surgery—the tests detect impingement as a mechanical process, not necessarily structural damage. 3, 5

Age-Specific Considerations

  • In younger athletes, positive tests more commonly indicate secondary impingement from rotator cuff weakness and scapular dyskinesis rather than structural tears. 6

  • In older patients, positive tests have higher likelihood of representing degenerative rotator cuff disease or tears. 1

Treatment Implications

  • Partial-thickness tears require 3-6 months of conservative management before considering surgery, regardless of positive impingement signs. 6

  • The Viggo-Cochin test may better predict response to dynamic humeral centering physiotherapy than the Neer test alone, with 5-fold higher response rates when positive. 7

Test Reliability

Both tests demonstrate high reproducibility when performed with standardized technique, with kappa coefficients of 0.91-1.00 for intra- and inter-examiner reliability. 8

  • The Hawkins test shows moderate intra-observer reproducibility (kappa 0.56) and moderate inter-observer reproducibility (kappa 0.54). 3

  • The Neer test demonstrates good inter-observer reproducibility (kappa 0.64) but poor intra-observer reproducibility. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Tests for Subacromial Impingement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Reproducibility of sub-acromial impingement tests, including a new clinical manoeuver.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2018

Guideline

Differential Diagnosis for Positive Empty Can Test

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.