In a patient with candidemia, should an echocardiographic evaluation be performed to assess for cardiac vegetations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Echocardiography for Candidemia: Essential for Detecting Cardiac Vegetations

Yes, echocardiographic evaluation should be performed in all patients with candidemia to assess for cardiac vegetations, as Candida infective endocarditis (CIE) occurs in approximately 4-6% of candidemic patients and is frequently clinically unsuspected. 1, 2

Incidence and Clinical Significance

  • CIE occurs in 4.2-5.9% of all candidemic patients, making it more common than historically recognized 2
  • At least 27% of CIE cases are clinically unsuspected at the time of diagnosis, meaning they would be missed without systematic echocardiographic screening 2
  • Fungal endocarditis carries the highest mortality among all causes of infective endocarditis, with 90-day mortality approaching 48.9% 1, 3, 4
  • Surgery is indicated for fungal endocarditis due to the low likelihood of antimicrobial control alone 1

Guideline Recommendations

  • Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be performed to detect organ involvement in patients with candidemia 1
  • Echocardiography is fundamental for detecting cardiac complications in patients with candidemia and/or disseminated candidiasis 1
  • Both TTE and TEE are recommended as complementary investigations, with TEE having superior sensitivity 1

Diagnostic Approach Algorithm

Initial Imaging Strategy

  • Start with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as the first-line imaging modality in all candidemic patients 1, 5
  • TTE sensitivity is approximately 75% for detecting vegetations, identifying only 2.9% of CIE cases in one prospective study 5, 2

When to Proceed to TEE

  • Perform TEE in all candidemic patients who are suitable candidates and can tolerate the procedure 1, 2
  • TEE has 11.5% positivity rate among candidemic patients who undergo the study, significantly higher than TTE 2
  • TEE sensitivity approaches 85-90% for detecting vegetations, with approximately 99% sensitivity for native valve endocarditis 5

High-Risk Features Requiring Immediate TEE

  • Pre-existing valvular heart disease (adjusted OR 7.66 for CIE) 4
  • Prosthetic valves or cardiac devices (TEE sensitivity 90% vs. TTE 50%) 5
  • Persistent candidemia despite appropriate antifungal therapy 1
  • New cardiac murmur or signs of heart failure 1

Characteristic Echocardiographic Features of CIE

Vegetation Characteristics

  • Large, dense, heterogeneous vegetations are the hallmark finding in 92% of CIE cases (11/12 patients) 6
  • Vegetations are typically >10 mm and carry high embolic risk 1, 5
  • Mobile masses attached to valvular structures appear as echogenic material 5

Myocardial Involvement

  • Hyperechogenic heterogeneous myocardial texture is seen in 58% of CIE cases (7/12 patients) and indicates extensive myocardial damage 6
  • This finding is relatively specific for Candida species endocarditis and warrants early surgical intervention 6

Valvular Complications

  • Valve perforation, dehiscence, and severe regurgitation are common findings 5
  • Perivalvular abscesses appear as thickened, non-homogeneous areas 5

Clinical Predictors That Modify Testing Strategy

Factors Associated with LOWER Risk of CIE

  • C. glabrata infection (adjusted OR 0.17) - these patients may have lower priority for immediate TEE 4
  • Hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 0.09) 4
  • Receipt of total parenteral nutrition (adjusted OR 0.38) 4

Critical Caveat

Even in lower-risk patients, echocardiography should still be strongly considered given the high mortality of missed CIE and the frequency of clinically unsuspected cases 2

Timing Considerations

  • Perform echocardiography as soon as candidemia is documented, ideally within 24-48 hours 1
  • Do not delay antifungal therapy while awaiting echocardiography 1
  • If initial TEE is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, repeat TEE after 3-10 days 5
  • Serial echocardiography is indicated if fever persists despite appropriate therapy or new cardiac symptoms develop 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on blood cultures - three consecutive blood cultures were negative in one confirmed case of CIE diagnosed by surgical specimen 7
  • Do not assume absence of cardiac symptoms excludes CIE - the disease is frequently clinically unsuspected 2
  • Do not accept a negative TTE as definitive - TEE detected CIE in 11.5% of patients when TTE was negative or equivocal 2
  • Do not delay surgical consultation if vegetations are identified, as medical therapy alone has high mortality 1

Management Implications of Positive Findings

  • Initiate echinocandin therapy (micafungin, caspofungin, or anidulafungin) as first-line treatment 1, 3
  • Consult cardiothoracic surgery immediately for consideration of valve replacement 1, 6
  • Extend antifungal therapy duration to at least 4-6 weeks, with at least 2 weeks after device/valve removal 1
  • Perform fundoscopy to evaluate for ocular candidiasis as part of comprehensive assessment 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The search for endocarditis in patients with candidemia: a systematic recommendation for echocardiography? A prospective cohort.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015

Guideline

Echocardiographic Findings in Infective Endocarditis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.