A woman presents with a single painful ulcerated vulvar lesion that looks like HPV; what are the likely causes and how should it be evaluated and managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Evaluation and Management of a Painful Ulcerated Vulvar Lesion

Most Likely Diagnosis

This presentation is most consistent with genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, not HPV, as HSV accounts for approximately 49% of all genital ulcer cases and characteristically presents as painful ulcerations, whereas HPV typically causes painless wart-like lesions. 1

Critical Differential Diagnosis

The key differential diagnoses for a single painful ulcerated vulvar lesion include:

  • Genital HSV (most likely): Presents with painful shallow ulcers that may be preceded by vesicles; accounts for 49% of genital ulcers 1
  • Primary syphilis: Classically a painless indurated chancre, though only 31% present with classic features; can occasionally be painful 1
  • Chancroid (Haemophilus ducreyi): Painful ulcers with ragged, undermined edges and purulent bases; tender inguinal adenopathy in one-third of cases 1
  • Aphthous ulcers (Lipschütz ulcers): Non-venereal acute vulvar ulcers, predominantly in young virgins, with flu-like prodrome 2, 3
  • Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Can present as a single ulcerated mass, especially in older women with chronic lichen sclerosus 2

Essential Diagnostic Workup

Immediate laboratory testing should include:

  • HSV culture or PCR from the ulcer base (gold standard for HSV diagnosis) 1
  • Serologic testing for syphilis (90% of primary syphilis cases show positive titers) 1
  • HIV screening at presentation and repeat at 3 months if initially negative (genital ulcers facilitate HIV transmission) 1
  • Dark-field microscopy or direct immunofluorescence for Treponema pallidum if available (provides immediate syphilis diagnosis) 1
  • Culture for H. ducreyi if chancroid is suspected (sensitivity approximately 80%) 1

Physical Examination Findings to Document

  • Ulcer morphology: Note whether borders are well-delimited, undermined, or irregular; assess for fibrinous/necrotic center versus clean base 1
  • Inguinal lymphadenopathy: Painful enlarged nodes suggest HSV or syphilis; tender unilateral nodes strongly suggest chancroid 2, 1
  • Presence of vesicles: Vesicular lesions progressing to shallow ulcerations that crust strongly support HSV over syphilis 1
  • Bartholin gland examination: Swelling at 4 and 8 o'clock positions may indicate bacterial infection including STI pathogens 2

Empiric Treatment Strategy

Because 25% of genital ulcers remain without laboratory confirmation despite comprehensive testing, and co-infection occurs in 3-10% of cases, empiric treatment is often necessary while awaiting results. 1

First-Line Empiric Regimen:

  • For presumed HSV: Acyclovir 400 mg orally five times daily for 10 days, initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset 1
    • Alternative: Valacyclovir 1 g orally twice daily for 7-10 days 1

Additional Coverage When Diagnosis Uncertain:

  • Empiric syphilis coverage: Benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units intramuscularly (single dose) 1
  • Empiric chancroid coverage (if endemic or high-risk): Azithromycin 1 g orally (single dose) OR ceftriaxone 250 mg intramuscularly 1

Follow-Up and Response Monitoring

Clinical reassessment should occur 3-7 days after therapy initiation:

  • Ulcers should improve subjectively within 3 days and objectively within 7 days of appropriate treatment 1
  • Large or extensive ulcers may require more than 2 weeks for complete healing 1

If No Improvement by Day 3-7, Consider:

  • Incorrect initial diagnosis 1
  • Co-infection with another pathogen (occurs in 3-10% of cases) 1
  • Underlying HIV infection 1
  • Antimicrobial resistance 1
  • Biopsy is indicated if lesions are pigmented, indurated, fixed, ulcerated, or not responding to therapy 2, 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on clinical appearance: Visual diagnosis is often inaccurate; laboratory confirmation is essential 1
  • Do not assume single pathogen: Co-infection with two or more organisms occurs in 3-10% of cases; up to 10% of chancroid cases are co-infected with T. pallidum or HSV 1
  • Do not dismiss HPV testing limitations: Negative HPV testing does not exclude HPV-related pathology, but painful ulceration is atypical for HPV 2, 4
  • Do not delay HIV testing: Repeat at 3 months if initially negative to capture seroconversion 1

Special Considerations for Immunocompromised Patients

  • Slower healing and higher treatment failure rates 4
  • Increased risk for atypical presentations and opportunistic infections 1
  • More frequent need for biopsy to exclude squamous cell carcinoma 4
  • May require prolonged therapy courses beyond standard regimens 4

When to Consider Malignancy

Biopsy is mandatory if:

  • Patient is older with history of chronic lichen sclerosus (5% risk of vulvar SCC) 2
  • Lesion is indurated, fixed, or has irregular borders 2, 4
  • No response to appropriate antimicrobial therapy 2
  • Patient is immunocompromised 2, 4

Approximately 60% of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas occur on a background of lichen sclerosus, though HPV-positive tumors more commonly present as multifocal lesions rather than single ulcers 2

References

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Genital Ulcer Disease – Evidence‑Based Summary

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Acute genital ulcers.

BMJ case reports, 2014

Guideline

Management of HPV-Negative Finger-Like Vulvar Projections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.