Light's Criteria for Pleural Effusion Classification
Primary Diagnostic Approach
Apply Light's criteria by measuring simultaneous pleural fluid and serum samples: classify as exudate if ANY ONE of these is met: pleural fluid/serum protein ratio >0.5, pleural fluid/serum LDH ratio >0.6, or pleural fluid LDH >2/3 the upper limit of normal serum LDH. 1, 2
Performance Characteristics
- Sensitivity: 97.5–98% for identifying exudates 2, 3
- Specificity: 70–80% for identifying exudates 2, 3
- Positive likelihood ratio: 3.5; Negative likelihood ratio: 0.03 2
- Meeting none of the three criteria indicates a transudate 2
Critical Limitation
Light's criteria misclassify approximately 25–30% of cardiac and hepatic transudates as exudates, particularly in patients receiving diuretics 2, 3, 4. This is the most common pitfall in clinical practice.
Correcting False-Positive Exudates
When Light's criteria suggest exudate but clinical context (heart failure, cirrhosis, diuretic therapy) points to transudate, apply these adjunctive tests in order:
For Suspected Heart Failure
Serum-effusion albumin gradient (SEAG): serum albumin minus pleural fluid albumin >1.2 g/dL reclassifies ~80–83% of false exudates as transudates with 97.5% accuracy 2, 5, 4
Pleural fluid/serum albumin ratio <0.6 indicates transudate (78% accuracy for cardiac effusions) 2, 4
NT-proBNP: serum or pleural fluid >1500 pg/mL confirms heart failure with 92–94% sensitivity and 88–91% specificity 2
- Serum NT-proBNP is preferred; pleural fluid measurement offers no advantage 6
For Suspected Hepatic Hydrothorax
- Pleural fluid/serum albumin ratio <0.6 has 77–78% accuracy for correctly identifying liver-related transudates misclassified by Light's criteria 2, 4
Clinical Scoring Alternative
- Porcel clinical scoring model ≥7 points indicates cardiac etiology with 92% accuracy (positive LR 12.7, negative LR 0.39) 2
Alternative When Serum Unavailable
If venipuncture is not feasible, use pleural fluid LDH >67% of upper limit of normal serum LDH AND pleural fluid cholesterol >55 mg/dL as an alternative with comparable discriminative capacity to Light's criteria 2, 7. However, this is an unusual circumstance and simultaneous serum sampling remains the standard.
Essential Practical Considerations
Sample Collection
- Collect pleural fluid and serum simultaneously to ensure accurate ratio calculations 2
- Send all samples for protein, LDH, pH, glucose, cytology, Gram stain, AFB stain, and culture in sterile vials plus blood culture bottles 6
Laboratory Variability Pitfall
- Up to 18% discordance in classification can occur between different laboratory analyzers, particularly affecting LDH measurements 2, 8
- LDH assays may perform differently in serum versus pleural fluid 8
Clinical Context Overrides
- Do not aspirate bilateral effusions in clinically obvious transudates (e.g., symmetric effusions with clear heart failure) unless atypical features present or failure to respond to therapy 6
- Diuretic therapy is the single most common cause of transudate misclassification as exudate 2
Diagnostic Algorithm Summary
- Apply Light's criteria first (98% sensitivity for exudates) 1, 2, 3
- If exudate by Light's but clinical picture suggests transudate:
- If transudate by Light's criteria: no further biochemical testing needed for classification 2
This approach maximizes detection of serious exudative causes (malignancy, infection) while providing tools to rescue the 25–30% of transudates incorrectly labeled as exudates 2, 3, 4.