How to Diagnose RSV Infection
Use nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT/RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal swab as the primary diagnostic method for RSV infection in all patient populations—it is the most sensitive test available and should be your first-line approach. 1, 2
Optimal Diagnostic Testing Strategy
First-Line Testing Approach
- Collect a nasopharyngeal swab or nasal aspirate and send for NAAT/RT-PCR testing, which has become the diagnostic method of choice and gold standard for RSV detection 1, 2
- Several FDA-cleared NAAT platforms are available, including multiplex panels that can detect RSV alongside other respiratory viruses (e.g., FilmArray Respiratory Panel, ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel, Xpert Flu/RSV XC) 1
- NAAT is significantly more sensitive than older methods: compared to rapid antigen detection tests (64% sensitivity), direct fluorescent antibody (83% sensitivity), and viral culture (86% sensitivity) 3
Specimen Collection Priorities
For immunocompetent patients with upper respiratory symptoms:
- Nasopharyngeal swab or nasal aspirate is sufficient 1, 2
- Transport in sterile container or viral transport medium at room temperature within 2 hours 1
For immunocompromised patients or those with lower respiratory tract infection:
- Obtain lower respiratory specimens (BAL fluid or endotracheal aspirate) in addition to upper respiratory samples, as lower tract specimens are dramatically more sensitive (BAL: 88.9% vs. nasal wash: 15%) 1, 2
- In immunocompromised adults, upper respiratory testing alone misses a substantial proportion of RSV infections 1
When to Enhance Diagnostic Yield
Add multiple specimen types when RSV suspicion remains high despite negative initial testing:
- Adding sputum RT-PCR to nasopharyngeal swab increases detection by 52% 3
- Adding oropharyngeal swab RT-PCR increases detection by 28% 3
- Adding paired acute and convalescent serology (4-fold rise in antibody titer) increases detection by 44%, though this is retrospective and not useful for acute management 3, 4
Alternative Testing Methods (Use Only When NAAT Unavailable)
Rapid Antigen Detection Tests
- Avoid relying on rapid antigen tests in adults, as sensitivity is poor (40-80%) due to lower viral loads compared to children 2
- Sensitivity and specificity range from 80-95% in children but may be even lower in actual practice 1
- Never accept a negative rapid antigen test as definitive—confirm with NAAT if clinical suspicion remains high 2
Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) Staining
- Can provide results within hours but has reduced sensitivity (83%) compared to NAAT 3
- May be acceptable for rapid screening when NAAT is unavailable 1
Viral Culture
- Time-consuming with cytopathic effect potentially not observed for up to 2 weeks 1
- Has been largely replaced by molecular methods in clinical practice 1
- Sensitivity of 86% makes it inferior to NAAT 3
What NOT to Do
Do not use serology for acute diagnosis:
- RSV seroprevalence is high in the general population, and IgG antibodies indicate past exposure, not acute infection 1, 2
- Serology is only useful for epidemiological studies, not clinical diagnosis 2
Do not rely on clinical features alone:
- RSV symptoms (cough, nasal congestion, wheezing, low-grade fever) overlap significantly with other respiratory viruses 2, 5
- Laboratory confirmation is essential as clinical characteristics are indistinguishable from other viral respiratory infections 1, 5
High-Risk Populations Requiring Testing
Prioritize testing in these groups during RSV season (typically December-March):
- Infants and young children, especially those under 1 year or premature 5
- Elderly adults ≥65 years, particularly ≥75 years 5
- Patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disease 1, 5
- Immunocompromised individuals (including transplant recipients) 1, 5
- Residents of long-term care facilities 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use upper respiratory specimens alone in critically ill or immunocompromised patients—always obtain lower respiratory specimens for higher sensitivity 1, 2
- Do not assume multiplex panels detect all targets with equal sensitivity—some panels have decreased sensitivity for RSV compared to singleplex NAAT 1
- Do not delay testing waiting for symptom progression—collect specimens in the early phase of disease for optimal viral detection 6
- Do not skip infection control measures while awaiting results—implement contact isolation precautions when RSV is suspected based on clinical presentation and epidemiology 1, 5