For bilateral corona radiata infarcts, should they be classified as a lacunar infarct (LACI) or a partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Classification of Bilateral Corona Radiata Infarcts

Bilateral corona radiata infarcts should be classified as LACI (lacunar infarcts) if they meet size criteria (<1.5 cm), are confined to subcortical white matter, and present without cortical signs—the bilateral nature does not automatically change their classification to PACI. 1, 2

Diagnostic Criteria for Lacunar Classification

The classification hinges on three essential elements that must all be satisfied:

Imaging Requirements

  • Each individual infarct must measure <1.5 cm in diameter on CT or MRI 1, 3
  • Lesions should be confined to deep white matter (corona radiata) without cortical involvement 1
  • The term "lacunar infarct" is most appropriately reserved for cystic lesions <1 cm in the basal ganglia, brainstem, or deep white matter 1

Clinical Presentation Must Lack Cortical Signs

  • The defining characteristic is the absence of cortical dysfunction—no aphasia, no neglect, no visual field defects 1, 2
  • Patients should present with classical lacunar syndromes: pure motor hemiparesis, pure sensory syndrome, sensorimotor stroke, ataxic hemiparesis, or dysarthria-clumsy hand 1, 4
  • The presence of aphasia or other cortical signs would mandate PACI classification regardless of infarct size 2

Exclusion of Alternative Mechanisms

  • You must exclude ipsilateral large-artery stenosis >50% through carotid imaging (duplex ultrasound, CTA, or MRA) 1, 3
  • Cardiac evaluation with transthoracic echocardiography and extended rhythm monitoring is mandatory to exclude cardioembolic sources 3
  • If atrial fibrillation or another cardioembolic source is identified, the patient requires anticoagulation regardless of small infarct size—this is a critical therapeutic distinction 3, 2

Special Considerations for Bilateral Infarcts

Clinical Patterns in Bilateral Corona Radiata Disease

  • Bilateral multiple corona radiata infarcts frequently present with bilateral motor and sensory symptoms plus neuropsychological deficits 5
  • Approximately 25% of corona radiata infarct patients have bilateral involvement, and these patients more commonly show complete sensorimotor deficits 5
  • Dysarthria occurs in 25% of cases but has no localizing value for unilateral versus bilateral disease 5

Underlying Pathophysiology

  • Small-artery disease with long-standing hypertension accounts for 59% of corona radiata infarcts, making it the dominant mechanism 5
  • Leukoaraiosis (white matter hyperintensities) is present in 88% of patients with corona radiata infarcts and is significantly more frequent in those with bilateral multiple infarcts compared to unilateral single infarcts 5
  • This coexistence suggests a shared pathophysiological mechanism of chronic small vessel disease 5

Critical Diagnostic Pitfall

Clinical classification alone is notoriously unreliable for distinguishing lacunar from small cortical infarcts. 6

  • In a prospective MRI study, OCSP clinical classification correctly identified only 39% of lacunar infarcts, with a positive predictive value of just 39% 6
  • 61% of patients clinically classified as LACI actually had radiographic appearances consistent with PACI (small cortical infarcts) 6
  • Conversely, 15% of those classified as PACI had true lacunar infarcts 6
  • MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging is therefore mandatory for accurate classification—clinical syndrome alone is insufficient 3, 6

Algorithmic Approach to Classification

  1. Obtain MRI (superior to CT) to confirm infarct location, size, and number 3, 2
  2. Measure each lesion: Are all infarcts <1.5 cm and confined to subcortical white matter? 1
  3. Assess clinical presentation: Are cortical signs (aphasia, neglect, visual field defects) absent? 1, 2
  4. Complete vascular workup: Exclude >50% large-artery stenosis with carotid imaging 1, 3
  5. Perform cardiac evaluation: TTE and rhythm monitoring to exclude cardioembolic sources 3
  6. If all criteria met: Classify as LACI despite bilateral distribution 1, 5
  7. If cortical signs present or cardioembolic source identified: Reclassify and adjust treatment accordingly 3, 2

Management Implications

  • For confirmed bilateral lacunar infarcts: Antiplatelet therapy, aggressive blood pressure control (target <130 mmHg systolic), statin therapy, and risk factor modification 1, 3, 4
  • If misclassified and cardioembolic source exists: Anticoagulation is required, not just antiplatelet therapy 3, 2
  • Bilateral involvement with leukoaraiosis signals higher risk for vascular cognitive impairment (develops in ~20% after first lacunar stroke and >33% with recurrent events) 1, 5

References

Guideline

Lacunar Infarcts: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Clinical Classification of Stroke

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Workup for Lacunar Stroke

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Lacunar stroke.

Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2009

Research

Spectrum of single and multiple corona radiata infarcts: clinical/MRI correlations.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2003

Related Questions

What are lacunar infarcts?
What is the recommended management for chronic lacunar infarction?
Can a lacunar infarct in the left putamen present with left-sided facial numbness and blurring of vision in an older adult with a history of vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia?
Are lacunar infarcts in the corona radiata and thalamus related to stroke in an elderly patient with vascular risk factors?
What is the best management plan for a patient with a chronic lacunar infarct and a history of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia?
What is the recommended anesthetic plan—including pre‑operative optimization, intra‑operative technique, postoperative analgesia, and ICU management—for a medically fit adult undergoing a Whipple procedure for resectable pancreatic‑head carcinoma?
How should complicated appendicitis be managed, including the appropriate antibiotic regimen, percutaneous drainage if indicated, and timing of appendectomy?
In an adult with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II heart failure, left bundle‑branch block (LBBB), septal dyssynchrony, global left‑ventricular hypokinesia and a reduced ejection fraction (~35 %), should coronary angiography be performed and antiplatelet therapy be initiated before non‑cardiac surgery, and how should he be risk‑stratified?
In a 45‑year‑old patient with diabetes mellitus and hypertension on postoperative day 4 after major abdominal surgery who presents with confusion, altered mental status, pale cold extremities, hypotension (mean arterial pressure 45 mm Hg), lactate 2 mmol/L, and low urine output, what is the best indicator of successful resuscitation?
What is the recommended intraoperative fluid management strategy for a medically fit adult undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy?
How should rebound pain after regional anesthesia be anticipated and managed in adult surgical patients?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.