How should twin discordancy be evaluated and managed in a multiple pregnancy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Evaluation and Management of Twin Discordancy

Twin discordancy ≥25% requires intensive surveillance with ultrasound every 2-3 weeks, umbilical artery Doppler studies (especially in monochorionic twins), and individualized delivery planning based on chorionicity, gestational age, and Doppler findings. 1

Definition and Clinical Significance

  • Severe discordance is defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) difference ≥25% between twins, calculated as [(larger twin EFW - smaller twin EFW) / larger twin EFW] × 100 1
  • Mild discordance is ≥15%, moderate is ≥20%, and severe is ≥25% 1
  • Approximately 75% of twins show <15% discordance (concordant), 20% are mildly discordant (15-25%), and 5% are severely discordant (>25%) 2
  • The larger the discordance level, the greater the risk for adverse outcomes including perinatal mortality and morbidity 2
  • Severe discordance occurs in approximately 11.6% of monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies 1

First Trimester Evaluation

  • Referral to a specialist should occur as early as the first trimester if crown-rump length (CRL) discrepancy is ≥10% or nuchal translucency (NT) discordance is ≥20% 3
  • NT discordance ≥20% is found in approximately 25% of monochorionic twins and carries up to 30% risk of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) or early intrauterine fetal demise 3
  • CRL discordance ≥10% is significantly associated with pregnancy loss, though the pooled predictive risk is only 52% 3
  • First trimester size disparity increases risk of underlying growth restriction, aneuploidy, congenital anomalies, and subsequent demise 3

Chorionicity-Specific Risk Stratification

Monochorionic Twins

  • Monochorionic twins with any growth discordance should undergo umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry even without other complications, as abnormal Doppler patterns can appear as early as 16-20 weeks and predict adverse outcomes including fetal demise 1
  • Begin surveillance at 16 weeks with fetal biometry every 2-3 weeks and weekly assessment for TTTS or other monochorionic-specific complications 3
  • Fetal echocardiography should be performed in all monochorionic gestations due to substantially increased risk of structural cardiac anomalies (eight-fold higher in monoamniotic twins) 1

Dichorionic Twins

  • Umbilical artery Doppler has no proven benefit in uncomplicated dichorionic twins but becomes valuable when growth delay is suspected 1
  • Follow every 3-4 weeks without complications 3
  • When discordance develops, increase surveillance frequency to every 2-3 weeks 1

Ultrasound Surveillance Protocol

Growth Assessment

  • Perform transabdominal ultrasound every 2-3 weeks to evaluate fetal growth, EFW percentiles, and abdominal circumference measurements 1
  • Abdominal circumference discordance >10% between 14-22 weeks is the strongest predictor of later adverse outcomes in both monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies 1
  • Use standard singleton growth charts, recognizing that twin growth naturally slows compared to singletons 3

Amniotic Fluid Assessment

  • At each scan, assess amniotic fluid volume in each sac 1
  • Oligohydramnios may signal TTTS in monochorionic twins or uteroplacental insufficiency in any chorionicity 1

Doppler Studies

  • Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry is essential whenever growth discordance is identified, particularly in monochorionic twins 1
  • Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow indicates severe placental insufficiency 1
  • Evaluate the ductus venosus for reversal of the A-wave and assess for tricuspid regurgitation, which denote fetal cardiac compromise 1

Antepartum Fetal Testing

  • Initiate non-stress testing (NST) or biophysical profile (BPP) surveillance using the same criteria applied to singleton pregnancies with suspected growth restriction 1
  • NST and BPP have comparable reliability in multiple gestations as in singletons for detecting fetal compromise 1

Additional Evaluations

  • Screen for velamentous cord insertion and vasa previa, which occur in up to 22% of monochorionic twin pregnancies and are more prevalent in all twin gestations 3, 1
  • Perform transvaginal cervical length assessment at the time of the routine anatomic survey (18-22 weeks) to stratify preterm delivery risk 3, 1
  • Evaluate for placenta previa, which is more common in twin pregnancies, especially dichorionic twins 3

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Third trimester ultrasound EFW is a poor predictor of actual birthweight discordance, with area under ROC curve of only 0.70 4
  • First trimester CRL differences are no less accurate than third trimester EFW in predicting discordance 4
  • Not all discordant pairs represent growth restriction—mild discordance may represent normal variation between siblings 2
  • A 15% birth weight discordancy should be used as the safety limit for birth weight disparity, with special attention when the second twin is discordant 5
  • Consider other causes of growth restriction including viral infection and chromosomal abnormalities, though unequal placental sharing is most common 3
  • The smaller twin in severely discordant pairs faces disproportionate risk for neonatal mortality 2

References

Guideline

Management of Significant Twin Growth Discordance (≥25%)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Birthweight discordance in multiple pregnancy.

Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 2003

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2008

Research

Characterization of the growth-discordant twin.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 1987

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.