In an 18‑year‑old male with a first‑time patellar dislocation, a large osteochondral fragment of the medial patellar facet and a medial patellofemoral ligament tear, should the osteochondral defect be fixed via an open approach rather than arthroscopically when planning MPFL reconstruction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Open vs. Arthroscopic Fixation of Patellar OCD with MPFL Reconstruction

For an 18-year-old male with first-time patellar dislocation and a large osteochondral fragment of the medial patellar facet requiring MPFL reconstruction, open fixation of the osteochondral defect is strongly recommended over arthroscopic fixation to ensure optimal visualization, rigid fixation, and fragment viability assessment.

Primary Recommendation

Open fixation should be performed when the osteochondral fragment is ≥1 cm² in the patellofemoral contact area, as this approach allows superior visualization of the fragment's undersurface, more secure fixation with screws or bioabsorbable implants, and better assessment of cartilage viability 1, 2.

Decision Algorithm for Surgical Approach

Fragment Size and Location Considerations

  • Fragments ≥1 cm² in the patellofemoral contact area mandate surgical fixation rather than removal, as fragment refixation or cartilage restoration techniques are strongly preferred over debridement to preserve joint surface integrity and prevent early-onset osteoarthritis 1.

  • Large fragments involving the medial patellar facet with substantial bone involvement require open approach because arthroscopic techniques provide inadequate visualization of the fragment's undersurface and limited ability to achieve rigid compression fixation 2, 3.

Technical Advantages of Open Fixation

  • Open arthrotomy allows direct visualization of the entire osteochondral fragment, enabling assessment of cartilage viability, debridement of friable edges to obtain stable healthy cartilage margins, and precise anatomic reduction of the fragment 4.

  • Rigid internal fixation with compression screws or bioabsorbable pins is more reliably achieved through open approach, particularly for fragments with significant subchondral bone that require penetration into stable bone for secure fixation 4.

  • The open approach permits thorough irrigation of the defect bed and removal of any interposed soft tissue or debris that could compromise fragment healing, which is difficult to accomplish arthroscopically 4.

Integration with MPFL Reconstruction

  • MPFL reconstruction should be performed during the same surgical session as osteochondral fragment fixation to address both the acute injury and the underlying instability mechanism, reducing recurrence risk from 17-49% with conservative treatment to approximately 5% with surgical stabilization 5, 1.

  • The open approach for fragment fixation does not preclude arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction, as the medial arthrotomy for patellar access can be performed through a separate incision from the MPFL femoral and patellar tunnels 2, 6.

  • Anatomical MPFL reconstruction using autograft or allograft is preferred over primary repair, as reconstruction provides superior biomechanical stability and lower redislocation rates compared to simple suture repair of the torn ligament 5, 1.

Critical Timing Considerations

  • Immediate surgical intervention is indicated when osteochondral fractures are present, rather than delayed repair, as early fixation (within 2-3 weeks) maximizes fragment viability and healing potential 1, 3.

  • Fragment removal should be avoided even if immediate surgery cannot be performed, as delayed open reduction and internal fixation is still preferred over excision to preserve articular cartilage 1.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Arthroscopic fixation of large patellar osteochondral fragments frequently fails due to inadequate visualization and inability to achieve rigid compression, leading to fragment nonunion, displacement, or conversion to loose body formation 2, 3.

  • Attempting arthroscopic fixation in an 18-year-old with substantial bone involvement risks growth plate injury if drilling is not precisely controlled under direct vision, though this patient is likely skeletally mature 2.

  • Failure to address the MPFL tear during osteochondral fragment fixation leaves the patient at high risk for recurrent instability, which can compromise the healing fragment through repetitive abnormal loading 5, 6.

Postoperative Management Requirements

  • Protected weight-bearing for 6-8 weeks is mandatory following osteochondral fragment fixation to allow bone-to-bone healing and cartilage integration, with progressive range of motion initiated immediately to prevent arthrofibrosis 7, 8.

  • Serial radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months is essential to monitor fragment incorporation, assess for displacement or hardware complications, and detect early signs of articular surface collapse 7.

References

Research

Management of first-time patellar dislocation: The ESSKA 2024 formal consensus-Part 2.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025

Research

MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2010

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[The treatment of patellar dislocation: a systematic review].

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie, 2011

Guideline

Treatment of Cystic Changes in the Femoral Head

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment of Superficial Chondropathy of the Superolateral Region of the Femoral Head with Anterosuperior Labral Tear

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.