What is the FLOW trial, including its design, population (adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease), intervention (once‑weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg), comparator (placebo), duration, and primary outcome?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is the FLOW Trial?

The FLOW trial (A Research Study to See How Semaglutide Works Compared with Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease) is a landmark randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that demonstrated once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg significantly reduces kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and mortality in adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. 1

Trial Design and Population

Study Design:

  • The FLOW trial randomized 3,533 participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive either once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg or matching placebo, with a median follow-up of 3.4 years. 2, 3
  • This was a multicenter, international trial designed to assess both renal and cardiovascular outcomes as primary endpoints. 1

Patient Population:

  • Adults with type 2 diabetes and established chronic kidney disease were enrolled, specifically those with:
    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ranging from 25–75 mL/min/1.73 m² at baseline (mean eGFR approximately 47 mL/min/1.73 m²) 1
    • Median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 568 mg/g (range 300–5,000 mg/g) 1
    • More than 99% of participants were on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy 1
  • The trial enrolled a high-risk population: 68.3% had very high KDIGO risk classification, 24.9% had high risk, and only 6.9% had low/moderate risk. 2
  • Approximately 19% of participants had heart failure at baseline. 3

Primary and Key Secondary Outcomes

Primary Kidney Outcome:

  • The primary endpoint was a composite of time to first occurrence of:
    • Persistent ≥50% decline in eGFR from baseline, or
    • Persistent eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m², or
    • Kidney replacement therapy (chronic dialysis or transplantation), or
    • Death from kidney or cardiovascular causes 4

Key Cardiovascular Outcomes:

  • Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke 2
  • Heart failure events: new onset or worsening heart failure requiring hospitalization or urgent visit with diuretic/vasoactive therapy intensification 3
  • All-cause mortality 2

Landmark Results

Kidney Protection:

  • Semaglutide reduced the primary kidney outcome by 24% overall (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI not specified in provided excerpts but trial was stopped early for efficacy) 4
  • In participants not taking mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at baseline, semaglutide reduced the primary kidney outcome by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68–0.92) 4
  • In the smaller subgroup taking MRAs at baseline, the reduction was 49% (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30–0.86), though the interaction was not statistically significant (P-interaction = 0.12) 4
  • Albuminuria was reduced by 33% at 104 weeks in non-MRA users (95% CI 26–39%) compared to placebo. 4

Cardiovascular Protection:

  • Semaglutide reduced MACE by 18% (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68–0.98; P = 0.03), with consistent benefit across all eGFR categories, UACR levels, and KDIGO risk classifications (all P-interaction >0.13). 2
  • The composite of heart failure events or cardiovascular death was reduced by 27% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62–0.87; P = 0.0005). 3
  • Heart failure events alone were reduced by 27% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58–0.92; P = 0.0068). 3
  • Cardiovascular death alone was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.56–0.89; P = 0.0036). 3

Mortality Benefit:

  • All-cause mortality was reduced by 20% overall (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67–0.95; P = 0.01). 2
  • The mortality benefit was particularly pronounced in participants with UACR ≥300 mg/g (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57–0.85), whereas those with UACR <300 mg/g showed no significant benefit (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.83–1.65; P-interaction = 0.01). 2

Clinical Context and Significance

Addressing the Evidence Gap:

  • Prior to FLOW, cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists had demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in people with type 2 diabetes, but dedicated renal outcome data were limited to secondary endpoints. 1
  • The 2021 and 2023 ADA Standards of Care explicitly stated that "proof of benefit on renal outcomes will come with the results of the ongoing FLOW trial with injectable semaglutide." 1
  • FLOW provides the first Level A evidence that a GLP-1 receptor agonist reduces hard kidney outcomes (kidney failure, dialysis, transplantation) as a primary endpoint. 1

Comparison to SGLT2 Inhibitor Trials:

  • The FLOW trial design parallels landmark SGLT2 inhibitor trials (CREDENCE with canagliflozin, DAPA-CKD with dapagliflozin) that established the renal protective effects of that drug class. 1
  • CREDENCE showed a 30% reduction in the primary composite endpoint (ESRD, doubling of creatinine, or renal/cardiovascular death) with canagliflozin. 1
  • DAPA-CKD demonstrated a 39% reduction in the primary outcome (≥50% eGFR decline, ESRD, or cardiovascular/renal death) with dapagliflozin. 1
  • FLOW establishes that semaglutide provides complementary renal protection to SGLT2 inhibitors, with benefits observed regardless of baseline SGLT2 inhibitor use. 5

Subgroup Analyses:

  • In participants taking SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline (N=550), the primary kidney outcome occurred in 41/277 semaglutide-treated versus 38/273 placebo-treated participants (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.69–1.67; P = 0.755). 5
  • In those not taking SGLT2 inhibitors (N=2,983), semaglutide reduced the primary outcome by 27% (290/1,490 vs 372/1,493; HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63–0.85; P <0.001). 5
  • The P-interaction was 0.109, suggesting no significant heterogeneity, though the trial was underpowered to detect smaller but clinically relevant additive effects in the SGLT2i subgroup. 5
  • Benefits on MACE and all-cause mortality were consistent regardless of SGLT2 inhibitor use (P-interaction 0.741 and 0.901, respectively). 5

Heart Failure Findings:

  • The heart failure benefit was consistent in participants with (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54–0.98) and without (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.58–0.89) baseline heart failure. 3
  • This represents primary prevention of heart failure in a CKD population, a particularly high-risk group for developing heart failure. 3

Safety Profile

  • The safety profile of semaglutide in FLOW was comparable across subgroups, including those taking versus not taking SGLT2 inhibitors or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at baseline. 4, 5
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) are the most common side effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, typically mild-to-moderate and transient. 6
  • Serious but rare risks include pancreatitis and gallbladder disease, though causality has not been definitively established. 6

Clinical Implications and Guideline Integration

Current Guideline Recommendations:

  • The 2023 ADA Standards of Care now recommend SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease (eGFR >20 mL/min/1.73 m² and UACR >200 mg/g) to reduce CKD progression and cardiovascular events. 1
  • With FLOW results now published, GLP-1 receptor agonists—specifically semaglutide—should be considered as complementary therapy to SGLT2 inhibitors for comprehensive cardiorenal protection in this population. 1, 5

Treatment Algorithm:

  • For patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD (eGFR 25–75 mL/min/1.73 m² and albuminuria):
    1. First-line: SGLT2 inhibitor (if eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m²) 1
    2. Add: GLP-1 receptor agonist (semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly) for additional cardiorenal protection, particularly if:
      • UACR ≥300 mg/g (greatest mortality benefit) 2
      • Established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk 2
      • Heart failure or high heart failure risk 3
    3. Continue: ACE inhibitor or ARB as background therapy 1, 4
    4. Consider: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (finerenone) for additional renal protection 4

Key Clinical Pearls:

  • The benefits of semaglutide were consistent across the spectrum of CKD severity, including those with very high KDIGO risk. 2
  • Semaglutide reduced cardiovascular death specifically, not just composite cardiovascular events—a mortality benefit that extends beyond glucose lowering. 2, 3
  • The trial was stopped early for efficacy, underscoring the magnitude of benefit observed. 4
  • FLOW establishes semaglutide as a disease-modifying therapy for diabetic kidney disease, not merely a glucose-lowering agent. 1, 2

Meta-Analytic Confirmation

  • A 2025 meta-analysis of three RCTs (including FLOW) involving 10,013 patients confirmed:
    • 29% reduction in cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52–0.97) 7
    • 20% reduction in MACE (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71–0.91) 7
    • 20% reduction in kidney-related adverse events (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71–0.89) 7
    • 14% reduction in need for cardiovascular medications (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81–0.91) 7

The FLOW trial fundamentally changes the treatment paradigm for type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease by establishing semaglutide as a cornerstone therapy for preventing kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and premature death in this high-risk population.

Related Questions

What are the considerations for using Ozempic (semaglutide) in a patient with type 2 diabetes, kidney disease, and heart failure?
What are the considerations for combining semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist) and dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease?
Does Ozempic (semaglutide) cause fluid retention?
How long should Ozempic (semaglutide) be withheld prior to a colonoscopy?
What are the potential adverse effects of Ozempic (semaglutide) in an adult patient with type 2 diabetes?
Do Medicare beneficiaries (≥65 years or disabled) receive a no‑cost Annual Wellness Visit when the provider accepts Medicare assignment?
Can mirtazapine be combined with Cymbalta (duloxetine) safely, and what precautions are needed?
Is there evidence supporting the use of human regular insulin (Actrapid) three times daily for post‑prandial glucose control in type 1 and insulin‑requiring type 2 diabetes?
For a 38‑week pregnant woman with severe asymmetric fetal growth restriction (abdominal circumference ~2.3th percentile, estimated fetal weight ~20th percentile) who wants a home birth and to wait for spontaneous labor, how often should ultrasound monitoring (biometry and umbilical‑artery Doppler) be performed?
What is the recommended evaluation and management of tachyarrhythmias in stable versus unstable patients?
Can an adult patient who is not pregnant, has no thyroid cancer risk, and no copper‑peptide allergy apply topical GHK‑Cu (copper peptide), inject tirzepatide (GLP‑1/GIP receptor agonist, e.g., Mounjaro) subcutaneously, and take oral Morosil (standardized blood‑orange extract) on the same day?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.