What is the appropriate diagnostic workup for a 79-year-old man on warfarin presenting with painless gross hematuria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Workup for 79-Year-Old Man on Coumadin with Painless Hematuria

This patient requires urgent and complete urologic evaluation with cystoscopy and multiphasic CT urography, regardless of anticoagulation status. Anticoagulation does not cause hematuria—it only unmasks underlying pathology that demands investigation. 1

Immediate Diagnostic Steps

Confirm true hematuria before proceeding with extensive workup:

  • Obtain microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field (RBC/HPF) on a properly collected clean-catch midstream specimen 1
  • Dipstick testing alone has only 65-99% specificity and can yield false positives from myoglobin, hemoglobin, or contaminants 1
  • For gross (visible) hematuria, microscopic confirmation is still required to document the degree of bleeding 2

Obtain baseline laboratory studies:

  • Serum creatinine, BUN, and complete metabolic panel to assess renal function 1, 2
  • Complete blood count with platelets to evaluate for anemia and coagulopathy 2
  • Urine culture (preferably before antibiotics) if infection is suspected 1, 3

Risk Stratification

This patient is automatically high-risk based on multiple factors:

  • Age 79 years (males ≥60 years are high-risk) 1
  • Painless gross hematuria carries a 30-40% risk of malignancy 1, 2
  • Anticoagulation status does not reduce cancer risk—warfarin may unmask underlying urologic pathology 1, 4, 5

Additional high-risk features to document:

  • Smoking history (>30 pack-years is high-risk for urothelial carcinoma) 1, 2
  • Occupational exposure to chemicals/dyes (benzenes, aromatic amines) 1, 2
  • Irritative voiding symptoms without infection 1
  • History of pelvic irradiation or cyclophosphamide exposure 3

Mandatory Urologic Evaluation

Upper Tract Imaging

Multiphasic CT urography is the imaging procedure of choice:

  • Includes unenhanced phase (detects calculi), nephrographic phase (evaluates renal parenchyma for masses), and excretory phase (assesses urothelium of upper tracts, ureters, and bladder) 1, 2, 3
  • Demonstrates 96% sensitivity and 99% specificity for detecting renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and urolithiasis 1, 2
  • If CT is contraindicated due to severe renal insufficiency or contrast allergy, use MR urography or renal ultrasound with retrograde pyelography 1

Lower Tract Evaluation

Cystoscopy is mandatory for all patients with gross hematuria:

  • Flexible cystoscopy is preferred over rigid cystoscopy—causes less pain with equivalent or superior diagnostic accuracy 1, 2
  • Provides direct visualization of bladder mucosa, urethra, and ureteral orifices 1
  • Bladder cancer accounts for 30-40% of gross hematuria cases and cannot be excluded by imaging alone 1, 2
  • Should be performed urgently (within 24-48 hours) even if bleeding appears self-limited 2, 3

Adjunctive Testing

Voided urine cytology should be obtained:

  • Particularly important in high-risk patients (age >60, smoking history, occupational exposures) 1, 2
  • Helps detect high-grade urothelial carcinomas and carcinoma in situ 1
  • Should not replace cystoscopy but serves as an adjunct 1, 2

Distinguishing Glomerular from Urologic Sources

Examine urinary sediment for glomerular indicators:

  • >80% dysmorphic RBCs or presence of red cell casts indicates glomerular disease 1, 2
  • Tea-colored or cola-colored urine suggests glomerular source 1, 2
  • Significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.5 g/g) strongly suggests renal parenchymal disease 1

If glomerular features are present:

  • Refer to nephrology in addition to completing the urologic evaluation 1, 2
  • Glomerular disease does not eliminate the need for urologic assessment—malignancy can coexist with medical renal disease 1, 2

Management of Anticoagulation

Do not discontinue warfarin without consulting the prescribing clinician:

  • The 2003 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines state that bleeding at an INR of 3.0 is frequently associated with an underlying lesion in the gastrointestinal or urinary tract 1
  • If bleeding is severe and life-threatening, consider vitamin K 10 mg by slow intravenous infusion supplemented with fresh plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate 1
  • For non-life-threatening bleeding with INR in therapeutic range, warfarin can be resumed once bleeding stops and the underlying cause is corrected 1

The American Geriatrics Society recommends:

  • More frequent INR monitoring may be required in older adults during illness or medication changes 1
  • Evaluation of the cause of bleeding is required before adjusting warfarin dosage 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never attribute hematuria solely to anticoagulation:

  • Prospective studies show that 30% of anticoagulated patients with hematuria have significant genitourinary pathology including malignancy 5, 6
  • Warfarin does not cause hematuria—it unmasks underlying disease 1, 4, 5
  • Evaluation must proceed regardless of INR level or type of anticoagulation therapy 1

Never dismiss self-limited gross hematuria:

  • Even single episodes carry 30-40% malignancy risk and require complete evaluation 1, 2
  • Hematuria can precede bladder cancer diagnosis by many years 1

Never delay evaluation while "optimizing" anticoagulation:

  • Diagnostic delays beyond 9 months are associated with worse cancer-specific survival 2
  • Early identification of malignancy allows for aggressive surgical intervention 4

Follow-Up Protocol

If initial workup is negative but hematuria persists:

  • Repeat urinalysis at 6,12,24, and 36 months with blood pressure monitoring at each visit 1, 2
  • Consider repeat complete evaluation within 3-5 years for persistent hematuria in high-risk patients 1, 2
  • After two consecutive negative annual urinalyses, further testing is unnecessary 1, 2

Immediate re-evaluation is warranted if:

  • Recurrent gross hematuria develops 1, 2
  • Significant increase in degree of microscopic hematuria occurs 1, 2
  • New urologic symptoms appear 1, 2
  • Development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Initial Workup for Hematuria and Pelvic Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

Can Eliquis (apixaban) cause microscopic hematuria (blood in the urine)?
Can Eliquis (apixaban) cause microscopic hematuria?
What is the management approach for a 38-year-old man with microscopic hematuria, history of nephrolithiasis (kidney stones), and a complex cyst on computed tomography (CT) scan?
What is the appropriate workup for a 91-year-old male presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with painful hematuria (bright red blood from the penis) of one week duration, with a history of colon cancer and currently taking warfarin (Coumadin, an anticoagulant)?
Should I restart 10mg of apixaban (Elquis) in a patient with ongoing gross hematuria after straight catheterization?
What empiric and targeted antibiotic regimen provides Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage, including dosing, duration, and options for resistant strains?
A 48-year-old woman has a normal complete blood count, hemoglobin A1c 5.8% and fasting plasma glucose 109 mg/dL (prediabetes). How should I manage her?
What is the normal hemoglobin range for a healthy 17‑year‑old female?
In a 62‑year‑old man with hypertension, poorly controlled type II diabetes mellitus, community‑acquired pneumonia and septic shock who is receiving hydrocortisone 200 mg per day (50 mg IV every 6 hours), what serious steroid‑related complications, other than worsening hyperglycemia, should be anticipated?
What are the causes, clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment of cardiac tamponade?
Can clonidine be used as an adjunctive treatment for hyperarousal and nightmares in an adult patient with post‑traumatic stress disorder who has already been started on trauma‑focused psychotherapy and an SSRI or SNRI, and what are the recommended dosing, titration, monitoring, and contraindications?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.