BUN vs Creatinine: What They Tell Us About Kidney Function
The BUN to creatinine ratio is primarily used to differentiate prerenal azotemia (kidney hypoperfusion) from intrinsic kidney injury, with a ratio >20:1 suggesting prerenal causes, though this interpretation has significant limitations in critically ill patients. 1, 2
Core Physiological Differences
BUN and creatinine respond differently to reduced kidney perfusion because of their distinct handling by the kidney:
- BUN rises disproportionately in dehydration because 40-50% of filtered urea is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule, paralleling sodium and water reabsorption 1
- When kidney perfusion decreases, this urea reabsorption increases significantly while creatinine (which is not reabsorbed) remains relatively stable 1
- Creatinine is less affected by extrarenal factors and provides a more accurate reflection of glomerular filtration rate, with measurement reproducibility within 2% 3
Interpreting the BUN:Creatinine Ratio
Normal Ratio (10-15:1)
- Indicates proportional elevation of both markers 4, 5
- Suggests intrinsic kidney injury where both BUN and creatinine rise together 1
Elevated Ratio (>20:1)
This pattern traditionally suggests prerenal azotemia, but multiple factors can cause this:
Prerenal Causes
- Dehydration/hypovolemia - the most common cause in hospitalized patients 1, 4
- Congestive heart failure (36% of cases with elevated BUN in hospitalized patients) 6
- Shock states (septic or hypovolemic) 4
- ACE inhibitors/ARBs combined with diuretics causing excessive volume depletion 1
Non-Prerenal Causes of Elevated Ratio
- High protein intake (>100 g/day) 4
- Increased protein catabolism from sepsis, high-dose steroids, or hypercatabolic states 4
- Gastrointestinal bleeding (protein load from blood) 4
- Malnutrition with low muscle mass (inappropriately low creatinine) 6, 4
Low Ratio (<10:1)
- May indicate malnutrition or inadequate protein intake 6
- Can reflect inappropriately low creatinine in elderly, malnourished, or sarcopenic patients 6
Critical Limitations in Clinical Practice
The Ratio is Unreliable in Critically Ill Patients
A landmark study found that BCR >20 in ICU patients was associated with increased mortality, not better outcomes as traditionally taught: 2
- Patients with BCR >20 were older, more severely ill, and had higher mortality 2
- The elevated ratio was associated with lower likelihood of receiving renal replacement therapy, possibly due to misinterpretation 2
- Clinicians should not use BCR >20 to classify AKI in critically ill patients 2
Multifactorial Nature
- Severely disproportionate BUN:Cr elevation is frequently multifactorial, with 16 of 19 patients in one study having two or more contributing factors 4
- Fractional sodium excretion was <1% (consistent with prerenal azotemia) in only 4 of 11 patients with elevated BCR, indicating the ratio poorly predicts true prerenal physiology 4
Practical Clinical Algorithm
Step 1: Assess Hydration Status
- Examine skin turgor, mucous membranes, orthostatic vital signs 1
- Review recent fluid balance and diuretic use 1
Step 2: Identify Contributing Factors
Look for:
- Volume depletion (vomiting, diarrhea, inadequate intake) 1, 4
- Heart failure with reduced cardiac output 6, 4
- High protein intake or gastrointestinal bleeding 4
- Sepsis or hypercatabolic state 4
- Medications (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, diuretics, NSAIDs) 1
Step 3: Check Urinalysis
- Proteinuria (>30 mg/g albumin-to-creatinine ratio) or hematuria suggests intrinsic kidney disease rather than prerenal azotemia 1
- Bland urine sediment supports prerenal etiology 7
Step 4: Consider Fractional Excretion of Urea (FEUrea)
- FEUrea <28.16% has 75% sensitivity and 83% specificity for hepatorenal syndrome vs non-HRS causes 7
- FEUrea is superior to fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) because it is not affected by diuretic use 7
Step 5: Trial of Rehydration
- In suspected prerenal azotemia, volume replacement should reduce serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL from baseline 7
- Recheck BUN and creatinine after adequate rehydration to confirm resolution 1
- Persistent elevation after rehydration indicates intrinsic kidney disease requiring further investigation 1
Special Clinical Contexts
Heart Failure Management
The American Heart Association recommends specific approaches when BUN:Cr ratio is elevated: 1
- Do not reduce diuretic intensity for modest BUN/creatinine elevations during aggressive diuresis if renal function stabilizes 1
- Restrict dietary sodium to ≤2 g daily 1
- Limit fluid intake to 2 L daily in patients with persistent fluid overload despite sodium restriction 1
- BUN:Cr ratio ≥15 independently predicts higher mortality risk 1
Dialysis Patients
- BUN is used to calculate protein catabolic rate and assess dialysis adequacy 6
- The ratio has limited utility for assessing acute changes in kidney function 7, 6
Elderly Patients
- Severely disproportionate BUN:Cr is most common in elderly patients, likely due to lower muscle mass (resulting in inappropriately low creatinine) 4
- MDRD formula may be preferred over Cockcroft-Gault for GFR estimation in patients ≥65 years 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not assume elevated BUN:Cr ratio always means simple dehydration - it is frequently multifactorial, especially in ICU patients 4, 2
Do not use the ratio alone to guide management in critically ill patients - it correlates with worse outcomes, not better prognosis 2
Do not discontinue ACE inhibitors/ARBs for small creatinine increases - they improve survival in heart failure despite modest BUN/creatinine elevations 1
Do not rely on BUN:Cr ratio when muscle mass is abnormal - elderly, malnourished, or sarcopenic patients have unreliable ratios 6, 4
Do not interpret elevated ratio without checking urinalysis - proteinuria or hematuria indicates intrinsic kidney disease regardless of the ratio 1
Recommended Approach to Kidney Function Assessment
For accurate kidney function assessment, use estimated GFR calculated by MDRD or CKD-EPI equations rather than relying on BUN:creatinine ratio: 6