Is there any clinical trial evidence supporting the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Clinical Trial Evidence for UDCA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

There is no clinical trial evidence supporting the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a treatment for established hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The available evidence consists only of preclinical studies and observational data suggesting potential chemopreventive effects in specific at-risk populations, not therapeutic efficacy in patients with diagnosed HCC.

Evidence from Clinical Trials

Absence of HCC Treatment Trials

  • No randomized controlled trials have evaluated UDCA as a therapeutic agent for HCC 1.
  • The National Cancer Institute consensus recommendations for HCC clinical trials do not mention UDCA as a candidate agent for systemic therapy 1.
  • Current standard-of-care trials use sorafenib as the control arm, with no consideration of UDCA in the treatment algorithm 1.

Observational Data in At-Risk Populations

The only clinical trial data involving UDCA and HCC comes from trials designed for other indications (primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis), where HCC was monitored as a secondary outcome:

  • Scandinavian PSC trial (n=219): No difference in HCC development between UDCA (17-23 mg/kg/day) and placebo groups over 5 years 1.
  • American PSC trial (n=150): No difference in HCC development between UDCA (28-30 mg/kg/day) and placebo groups 1.
  • German cohort study (n=150): Observed HCC in 3.3% of PSC patients treated with UDCA over 6.4 years, representing approximately half the expected incidence—but this was an uncontrolled observational study, not a clinical trial 1.

Important Context: PSC vs. HCC

  • PSC is associated with a 161-fold increased risk of hepatobiliary malignancies (including HCC and cholangiocarcinoma) compared to the general population 1.
  • The hepatobiliary malignancies in PSC are predominantly cholangiocarcinoma, not HCC 1.
  • These trials were evaluating UDCA for PSC disease progression, not for HCC prevention or treatment 1.

Preclinical Evidence Only

Laboratory Studies

The only supportive evidence for UDCA in HCC comes from preclinical research:

  • Rat carcinogenesis model: UDCA (0.1-0.3% supplemented diet) reduced hepatocarcinogenesis by inducing apoptosis in initiated hepatocytes and inhibiting proliferation 2.
  • In vitro studies: UDCA induced apoptosis in Huh7 and Fao HCC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner 2.
  • Xenograft model: UDCA (30-70 mg/kg/day) suppressed BEL7402 HCC tumor growth in nude mice through apoptosis induction 3.
  • Combination therapy: UDCA showed synergistic effects with sorafenib in HCC cell lines through STAT3 inhibition and ERK activation 4.

Critical Limitation

  • These preclinical findings have never been translated into human clinical trials for HCC treatment 2, 4, 3.
  • The concentration-dependent effects observed in vitro (with protection from apoptosis at higher concentrations) raise concerns about optimal dosing 5.

Chemopreventive Data (Not Treatment)

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Population

  • One observational study (n=375) found that PBC patients who did not respond to UDCA had a 10-year HCC incidence of 9% and 15-year incidence of 20%, compared to 0.2% annual incidence in responders 6.
  • This suggests UDCA may have chemopreventive effects in PBC patients who achieve biochemical response, but this is prevention in at-risk populations, not treatment of established HCC 6.

Dosing Concerns in Advanced Disease

  • High-dose UDCA (28-30 mg/kg/day) was associated with increased risk of liver transplantation and variceal development in advanced PSC 1.
  • Current guidelines recommend against routine UDCA use in PSC, and high doses may be harmful in late-stage disease 1, 7.

Clinical Practice Implications

What This Means for HCC Patients

  • UDCA should not be used as a treatment for diagnosed HCC based on the complete absence of clinical trial evidence 1.
  • Patients with HCC should receive evidence-based therapies such as sorafenib, regional therapies (TACE, ablation), or surgical interventions depending on disease stage 1.

Potential Role in Prevention Only

  • UDCA may have a role in HCC chemoprevention in specific populations (PBC patients with biochemical response to therapy), but this requires prospective validation 6.
  • Any consideration of UDCA for chemoprevention should be limited to patients with chronic cholestatic liver disease at risk for HCC, not patients with established HCC 6.

Common Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do not extrapolate preclinical anti-tumor effects to clinical efficacy—the concentration-dependent effects and lack of human trial data make this inappropriate 2, 4, 3, 5.
  • Do not confuse potential chemopreventive effects in at-risk populations with therapeutic efficacy in established cancer 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.