How should a 37‑year‑old woman with normal cervical cytology and a positive high‑risk HPV test (non‑16/18) be managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of 37-Year-Old Woman with Normal Cytology and High-Risk HPV Positive (Non-16/18)

Repeat co-testing (HPV and cytology) at 12 months is the recommended management strategy, with colposcopy reserved only if HPV remains positive or cytology becomes abnormal at follow-up. 1, 2

Rationale for Conservative Management

The decision to defer immediate colposcopy is based on several key risk considerations:

  • The baseline risk of undetected CIN 2+ is only 2.4-5.1% in screened populations with normal cytology and positive non-16/18 high-risk HPV, which is substantially lower than the 8-10% threshold that triggers immediate colposcopic referral. 1, 2

  • Non-16/18 high-risk HPV types carry a 10-year cumulative risk of CIN 3+ of only 1.5-3%, markedly lower than the 17-21% risk associated with HPV 16 or 18. 1, 2

  • Approximately 60% of high-risk HPV infections clear spontaneously within 12 months, even in women aged 30 and older, supporting a watch-and-wait approach. 1, 2

Step-by-Step Management Algorithm

At Initial Diagnosis (Now)

  • Schedule repeat co-testing (both HPV and cytology) at 12 months from the current positive HPV result. 1, 2

  • Counsel the patient that her immediate risk of having an undetected high-grade lesion is low (2.4-5.1%) and that most HPV infections resolve spontaneously. 1, 2

  • Do NOT perform immediate colposcopy unless there are other clinical indications, as this would represent overtreatment for her risk level. 1, 2

  • Do NOT order additional HPV genotyping beyond confirming negative for types 16/18, as testing for other specific genotypes is not clinically validated or recommended. 1, 2

At 12-Month Follow-Up Visit

The management pathway depends on the repeat test results:

  • If HPV remains positive (regardless of cytology result): Proceed to colposcopy with endocervical sampling. 1, 2

  • If cytology shows any abnormality (regardless of HPV status): Proceed to colposcopy according to cytology-based management guidelines. 1, 2

  • If both HPV and cytology are negative: Return to routine age-based screening (typically every 3 years with co-testing). 1, 2

Why HPV Testing or Co-Testing Is Preferred for Follow-Up

HPV testing or co-testing is superior to cytology alone for follow-up because negative HPV testing has a 99-100% negative predictive value for ruling out CIN 2+, whereas cytology alone is less sensitive. 1, 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do NOT refer directly to colposcopy based solely on positive non-16/18 high-risk HPV with normal cytology, as this represents unnecessary intervention for the patient's risk level. 1, 2

  • Do NOT use cytology alone for the 12-month follow-up; co-testing (HPV plus cytology) is required to adequately assess risk. 1, 2

  • Do NOT test for low-risk HPV types (such as types 6 and 11), as there is no clinical utility in testing for non-oncogenic types. 1, 2

  • Emphasize the importance of adherence to the 12-month follow-up appointment, as missed appointments leave women at higher residual risk for progression. 2

Nuances and Evidence Quality

While one recent retrospective study from 2021 suggested that 6.5% of women with non-16/18 high-risk HPV and negative cytology had CIN 2+ lesions at immediate colposcopy 3, the consensus guidelines from ASCCP and CDC explicitly recommend the conservative 12-month follow-up approach based on larger prospective cohort data showing that the benefits of avoiding overtreatment outweigh the small risk of delayed diagnosis. 1, 2 The guideline approach balances the harms of over-referral (anxiety, unnecessary procedures, potential cervical damage) against the small absolute risk of missed disease in this population.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Positive HPV Test Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

In a woman undergoing cervical cancer screening with a ThinPrep Pap test that is abnormal while the concurrent high‑risk HPV test is negative, what does this result mean and what are the recommended next steps?
What are the next steps for a 41-year-old female with normal Pap (Papanicolaou) cytology but positive Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test for high-risk strains 18/45?
What are the management and follow-up recommendations for a 41-year-old female with a normal Pap (Papanicolau) smear, positive for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) but negative for high-risk strains 16, 18, and 45?
What is the management plan for a 32-year-old female with a normal Pap (Papanicolau) smear and positive Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status for non-high-risk types?
What are the screening guidelines for a 39-year-old female with a history of positive Human Papillomavirus (HPV) but current negative Pap (Papanicolaou) test, HPV, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (ILM) screenings?
What is the recommended workup for a low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level?
How should primary adrenal insufficiency be diagnosed and managed?
In a patient with a Do‑Not‑Resuscitate (DNR) order who has an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter‑defibrillator (ICD), how should the device be managed—continue pacing, adjust settings, or deactivate?
What is the modified World Health Organization (WHO) maternal cardiovascular risk classification for a pregnant woman with chronic diastolic heart failure, ejection fraction 45–50 %, grade 3 diastolic dysfunction, and non‑ischemic cardiomyopathy?
What is the recommended acyclovir dosing for varicella (chickenpox) in healthy children, immunocompetent adolescents/adults, and immunocompromised patients?
How should I treat a 55‑year‑old patient with trigeminal neuralgia affecting the V2/V3 distribution, presenting with brief electric‑shock‑like facial pain triggered by light touch, chewing, or speaking?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.