Differences Between Ingrezza and Austedo for Tardive Dyskinesia Treatment
Both Ingrezza (valbenazine) and Austedo (deutetrabenazine) are FDA-approved VMAT2 inhibitors with equivalent efficacy for treating moderate to severe tardive dyskinesia, and either agent is appropriate as first-line pharmacotherapy; selection should be based on dosing convenience, side effect profile, and cost considerations. 1
Efficacy Comparison
Both medications demonstrate similar clinical effectiveness in treating tardive dyskinesia:
- AIMS score reduction: Both agents reduce Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores by 2-5 points from baseline 2
- Response rates: AIMS response rates (defined as ≥50% symptom reduction) range from 33% to 50% for both medications 2
- Evidence quality: Both have Level 1A evidence supporting their efficacy for TD, representing the only therapies with this level of evidence 1
The American Psychiatric Association recommends treating moderate to severe or disabling tardive dyskinesia with a VMAT2 inhibitor (valbenazine or deutetrabenazine) as first-line pharmacotherapy, without preferential recommendation for either agent. 1
Dosing Differences
Ingrezza (Valbenazine)
- Dosing range: 40-80 mg once daily 2
- Dosing simplicity: Once-daily administration provides convenience 2
- Titration: Less complex titration schedule
Austedo (Deutetrabenazine)
- Dosing range: 12-36 mg per day 2
- Dosing frequency: Typically requires twice-daily administration due to shorter half-life 3
- Titration: More gradual titration may be needed
Pharmacologic Mechanism Distinctions
While both inhibit VMAT2, they have distinct pharmacologic properties:
- Metabolite differences: The agents differ in their active metabolites and pharmacokinetic profiles 3
- Deuteration: Deutetrabenazine contains deuterium substitution, which affects its metabolic pathway 3
- Clinical significance: These pharmacologic differences may influence individual patient response, though head-to-head studies are lacking 2
Tolerability Profile
Both medications are well tolerated with similar adverse effect profiles:
- Most common side effects: Somnolence and akathisia are reported most frequently with both agents, though at low rates 2
- Overall tolerability: Both demonstrate good tolerability in randomized controlled trials 2
- Safety monitoring: Regular monitoring for movement disorders should continue regardless of which agent is selected 1
Selection Criteria
Agent selection should be guided by:
- Dosing convenience: Valbenazine's once-daily dosing may improve adherence compared to deutetrabenazine's twice-daily regimen 2
- Special populations: Manufacturer labeling provides specific recommendations for renal/hepatic impairment, drug interactions, and other special populations 2
- Cost considerations: Medication costs for long-term TD treatment are substantial, and cost may be a determining factor 1
- Individual patient factors: Consider patient-specific factors including comorbidities, concomitant medications, and ability to adhere to dosing schedules 2
Critical Caveats
- No head-to-head trials: Direct comparative studies are warranted to determine if either agent is preferable in terms of efficacy or tolerability 2
- Equivalent guideline status: Neither agent is preferentially recommended over the other in current clinical guidelines 1
- Not for acute EPS: These medications are specifically for tardive dyskinesia, not for acute dystonia or parkinsonism, which require different management 1
- Anticholinergics contraindicated: Do not use anticholinergic medications for TD, as they are ineffective and may worsen symptoms 1, 4
Monitoring Requirements
Regardless of which VMAT2 inhibitor is selected: