What incision and operative steps are recommended for open umbilical hernia repair?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Umbilical Hernia Repair: Incision and Operative Steps

For adult umbilical hernias, use a single curved intra-umbilical incision (1.5-2.5 cm) that provides excellent cosmesis while allowing complete hernia repair, with mesh reinforcement mandatory for defects >2-3 cm to prevent the 42% recurrence rate associated with primary suture repair alone. 1, 2, 3

Incision Selection

The periumbilical or intra-umbilical curved incision is the preferred approach, offering superior cosmetic outcomes with no externally visible scar postoperatively. 2

  • Incision length: 1.5-2.5 cm average, placed within the natural umbilical folds 2
  • Avoid midline incisions when possible, as non-midline approaches demonstrate significantly lower incisional hernia rates in high-quality evidence 4
  • The transumbilical approach allows direct access to the fascial defect while preserving umbilical aesthetics 5

Operative Steps: Algorithmic Approach

Step 1: Exposure and Sac Identification

  • Make the curved intra-umbilical incision through skin and subcutaneous tissue 2
  • Identify and dissect the hernia sac from the fascial defect margins 1
  • Free the sac circumferentially from the edges of the fascial defect 1

Step 2: Defect Size Assessment and Repair Strategy

For defects <2-3 cm:

  • Primary suture repair with non-absorbable sutures is acceptable in low-risk patients 1, 3
  • However, mesh reinforcement should be strongly considered even for smaller defects, as institutional data shows recurrence rates of 4.9% with tissue repair alone 3

For defects ≥3 cm:

  • Mesh repair is mandatory to avoid the 42% recurrence rate associated with primary suture alone 6
  • The mesh must overlap the defect edge by 1.5-2.5 cm in all directions 6

For patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m²:

  • Perform mesh hernioplasty regardless of defect size, as obesity is an independent risk factor for recurrence 2

Step 3: Mesh Placement Technique (When Indicated)

For defects <3 cm:

  • Insert a cone-shaped polypropylene mesh into the extraperitoneal plane 1
  • Secure with non-absorbable sutures to the fascial edges 1
  • No fascial closure is required when using the cone technique 1

For defects >3 cm:

  • Create an extraperitoneal space by dissecting between fascia and peritoneum 1
  • Place a flat polypropylene mesh as a sublay (retromuscular/preperitoneal position) 1
  • The sublay position is preferred as it provides superior strength and lower recurrence rates 4
  • Mesh can be fixed with transfascial sutures or tackers 6

Alternative minimally invasive approach (eTEP technique):

  • The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach places mesh outside the abdominal cavity via a minimally invasive technique 7
  • Uses inferior port positioning with caudal-to-cranial dissection 7
  • Mean operative time 101.8 minutes, but offers excellent outcomes with no recurrences in recent series 7
  • Requires higher surgical expertise but is highly reproducible once mastered 7

Step 4: Fascial and Skin Closure

  • Do not attempt to close the fascial defect when using mesh repair, as tension-free technique is the goal 1
  • For primary suture repair: close the fascial defect with non-absorbable sutures using continuous technique (faster than interrupted, with equivalent outcomes) 4
  • Excise excess umbilical skin at a fixed length to maintain natural contour 5
  • Suture fascia and dermis vertically over 15 mm length for optimal cosmesis 5

Anesthesia Considerations

Local anesthesia is the preferred approach for open umbilical hernia repair, offering multiple advantages over general anesthesia. 1, 6

  • Fewer cardiac and respiratory complications 6
  • Shorter hospital stays and lower costs 6
  • Faster recovery times 6
  • All 49 of 54 patients in one series successfully underwent repair under local anesthesia 1

Expected Outcomes and Follow-Up

  • Postoperative pain: Typically mild to moderate; no patients should experience severe pain with proper technique 1
  • Hospital stay: Average 1.8-3.9 days depending on technique 2, 7
  • Complications: Superficial wound infection (7-15 patients in series) responds to oral antibiotics without mesh removal 1, 2
  • Recurrence with mesh: Essentially 0% at 2-6 year follow-up when proper technique is used 1, 2
  • Recurrence without mesh: 4.9-19% depending on defect size and patient factors 4, 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Inadequate mesh overlap: Failure to achieve 1.5-2.5 cm overlap in all directions leads to recurrence 6

Using primary suture for defects >3 cm: This results in a 42% recurrence rate and should be avoided 6

Attempting fascial closure under tension: When using mesh, do not close the fascial defect—this defeats the purpose of tension-free repair 1

Ignoring BMI in surgical planning: Patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² require mesh regardless of defect size 2

Inadequate extraperitoneal dissection: Insufficient space creation prevents proper mesh positioning and increases recurrence risk 1

Choosing midline extraction sites in laparoscopic cases: This significantly increases incisional hernia rates and should be avoided 4

References

Research

Tension-free mesh repair of umbilical hernia as a day case using local anaesthesia.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2004

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Inguinal Hernia Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Umbilical hernia repair by the eTEP, a reproducible and valuable technique.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.