What proportion of Mycoplasma pneumoniae community‑acquired pneumonia cases have bacterial co‑infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bacterial Co-infection Rates in Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Bacterial co-infection occurs in approximately 2-10% of patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia, with Streptococcus pneumoniae being the predominant co-pathogen.

Co-infection Prevalence

The frequency of bacterial co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae varies based on diagnostic methods and population studied:

  • In hospitalized children, bacterial co-infection with M. pneumoniae pneumonia occurs in approximately 2% of cases based on a large retrospective study of 8,612 children, with S. pneumoniae identified in 56.2% of these co-infections 1

  • In adult populations, the American Thoracic Society guidelines report that atypical pathogen co-infection (including M. pneumoniae with bacterial pathogens) ranges from 3% to 40% depending on diagnostic criteria used, though the clinical significance of serologic diagnoses remains uncertain 2

  • European guidelines indicate that mixed infections involving bacteria with atypical organisms occur in 29% of polymicrobial CAP cases, with the most frequent combination being S. pneumoniae with C. pneumoniae (15%), though specific M. pneumoniae co-infection rates are lower 2

Most Common Co-pathogens

When bacterial co-infection does occur with M. pneumoniae:

  • S. pneumoniae is the predominant bacterial co-pathogen, accounting for 56-63% of identified bacterial co-infections 1, 2

  • H. influenzae represents the second most common co-pathogen 2

  • Mixed viral-bacterial infections with M. pneumoniae occur in approximately 10% of polymicrobial cases 2

Important Clinical Caveats

Diagnostic limitations significantly affect reported rates:

  • Most co-infection data derives from serologic testing showing fourfold titer rises, which may not represent true concurrent infection versus sequential infection or cross-reactivity 2

  • The distinction between M. pneumoniae causing initial infection that predisposes to secondary bacterial infection versus true simultaneous co-infection remains uncertain 2

  • Blood cultures are positive in only 13.6% of bacterial pneumonia cases, limiting definitive bacterial diagnosis 3

Age-related patterns:

  • In children aged 5 years and older, M. pneumoniae accounts for 4-39% of CAP cases, with co-infection rates appearing lower in pediatric populations compared to mixed bacterial-viral infections 2

  • In adults, M. pneumoniae represents 13-37% of outpatient CAP when serologic testing is performed, with the highest co-infection rates (up to 10.2%) reported in Chinese adult populations 2, 4

The conservative clinical estimate for true bacterial co-infection with M. pneumoniae pneumonia is 2-10%, though this likely underestimates the actual rate due to diagnostic limitations 1, 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Acute community-acquired pneumonias.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde, 1983

Research

[A multicentre study on the pathogenic agents in 665 adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia in cities of China].

Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.