How likely is significant pudendal nerve axonal injury in a patient with prior colorectal and anal‑fissure surgery who has persistent abnormal anal sensation during sexual activity despite normal pin‑prick testing and normal pudendal‑nerve terminal motor latency?

Likelihood of Significant Pudendal Nerve Axonal Injury

Significant axonal injury to the pudendal nerve is unlikely in this clinical scenario, given the normal pin-prick sensation and normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML), which together effectively exclude both severe axonal damage and demyelinating neuropathy. 1, 2, 3

Neurophysiologic Evidence Against Axonal Injury

The combination of normal sensory testing and normal PNTML provides strong evidence against clinically significant nerve damage:

• Normal pin-prick testing indicates intact sensory axons across all six pudendal nerve branches (dorsal nerve of penis/clitoris, perineal nerves, and inferior rectal nerves), which would be abnormal in 92% of patients with true pudendal neuropathy 4

• Normal PNTML (≤2.5 ms) excludes demyelinating injury to the pudendal nerve, which would manifest as prolonged latencies if present 1, 2

• Axonal neuropathy specifically produces abnormal electromyography (EMG) findings with evidence of denervation and reinnervation, not isolated sensory complaints with normal objective testing 2, 3

Understanding the Discordance Between Symptoms and Testing

The persistent abnormal anal sensation during sexual activity despite normal objective testing suggests alternative explanations:

• Fiber density measurements are more sensitive than PNTML for detecting subtle neurogenic changes, with 82% of fecal incontinence patients showing increased fiber density (>1.7) even when PNTML is normal 1

• PNTML has limited clinical utility as a standalone test, showing no correlation with symptom severity or functional outcomes in multiple studies, and its routine use has been questioned 1, 2

• Anal sphincter EMG is superior to PNTML for detecting neurogenic injury, correlating strongly with functional parameters (squeeze pressure) while PNTML does not 2

Patterns of Pudendal Nerve Injury

When pudendal neuropathy does occur post-surgically, it follows identifiable patterns that do not match this presentation:

• Pure demyelinating injury produces prolonged sensory thresholds (>5.2 mA on clitoral-anal reflex) with normal EMG 3

• Pure axonal neuropathy shows abnormal EMG with denervation/reinnervation but normal sensory thresholds 3

• Mixed demyelinating/axonal injury demonstrates both prolonged latencies and abnormal EMG with reinnervation 3

• This patient fits none of these patterns, as both sensory and motor testing are normal 1, 2, 3

Alternative Explanations for Persistent Symptoms

The normal neurophysiologic testing redirects the diagnostic focus:

• Scar tissue or anatomical distortion from prior colorectal and anal-fissure surgery may alter mechanoreceptor function without causing axonal injury 4

• Increased fiber density without frank neuropathy can produce altered sensation and correlates with decreased rectal sensibility, particularly in patients with prior surgical trauma 1

• Compression without axonal loss may occur at multiple anatomical sites (between sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments, within Alcock canal, or at aberrant pathways) but would typically show abnormal PNTML if severe enough to cause symptoms 4

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

• Do not assume normal PNTML excludes all nerve pathology—it only excludes demyelinating injury and severe axonal loss; subtle axonal changes require EMG or fiber density analysis 1, 2

• Do not pursue pudendal nerve decompression surgery based on symptoms alone without objective neurophysiologic confirmation of neuropathy, as only 35% of patients with suspected pudendal syndrome have findings warranting surgical intervention 4

• Recognize that altered sensation may reflect peripheral sensitization or central processing changes rather than structural nerve damage, particularly when objective testing is normal 1, 3

Recommended Diagnostic Approach

If clinical suspicion for nerve injury persists despite normal screening tests:

• Obtain anal sphincter EMG with quantitative analysis to detect subtle axonal changes that PNTML misses, as EMG is more sensitive and functionally relevant 2, 3

• Consider fiber density measurement if EMG is normal but symptoms persist, as this detects reinnervation patterns indicating prior subclinical injury 1

• Reserve advanced imaging (3T MR neurography) for cases with objective neurophysiologic abnormalities to visualize anatomical compression or nerve injury 5

Bold the sentence that makes your recommendation most clearly.