What are the types of pancreatico‑jejunostomy anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy and which is considered the safest default technique?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Pancreaticojejunostomy Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

The two main types of pancreaticojejunostomy are duct-to-mucosa anastomosis and invagination anastomosis, with the Blumgart technique (a modified duct-to-mucosa approach using trans-pancreatic U-sutures) representing the safest default option based on its superior reduction in severe complications and mortality. 1, 2

Primary Anastomotic Techniques

Duct-to-Mucosa Anastomosis

  • This technique involves direct anastomosis between the pancreatic duct and a small opening in the jejunal mucosa, typically performed in multiple layers 3
  • The standard approach uses an outer layer between pancreatic capsule and jejunal serosa, a middle layer between pancreatic parenchyma and seromuscular jejunal wall, and an inner layer between pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa 3
  • Continuous suturing of the duct-to-mucosa layer reduces leakage rates to 4.2% compared to 11.8% with interrupted sutures 3
  • This technique significantly reduces clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rates (3.1% vs 17.6% with invagination) and shortens hospital stay by 2 days 4

Invagination Technique

  • This method involves telescoping the end of the pancreatic remnant into the jejunal lumen 3, 5
  • Historical leakage rates with invagination reach 17.2%, significantly higher than modern duct-to-mucosa techniques 3
  • While overall pancreatic fistula rates are similar between techniques (approximately 29-31%), invagination carries higher rates of severe complications 5, 2

Blumgart Anastomosis (Recommended Default)

  • The Blumgart modification combines duct-to-mucosa principles with trans-pancreatic U-sutures that provide gentle circumferential compression of the pancreatic remnant 1, 2
  • Meticulous technique with magnification and careful preservation of pancreatic blood supply has been reported to nearly eliminate postoperative pancreatic fistula formation 1
  • Critical technical point: apply gentle compression without excessive tension when tying trans-pancreatic sutures, as overtightening compromises parenchymal perfusion and paradoxically increases fistula risk 1
  • In propensity-matched analysis, Blumgart anastomosis achieved zero severe complications (0% vs 35.1% with other techniques), zero grade C pancreatic fistulas (0% vs 16.2%), and zero 90-day mortality (0% vs 12.2%) 2

Alternative Reconstruction Option

Pancreaticogastrostomy

  • Randomized trials demonstrate no overall difference in outcomes between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy 1
  • Both pancreato-jejunostomy and pancreato-gastrostomy reconstructions are equally effective in selected trauma cases performed by experienced surgeons 6
  • This remains a viable alternative when jejunal anatomy is unfavorable or in trauma settings 6

Evidence Synthesis and Clinical Algorithm

When performing pancreaticoduodenectomy reconstruction, the decision algorithm should be:

  1. Default to Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy for elective cases given its superior safety profile in reducing severe complications and mortality to near-zero rates 2

  2. Consider standard duct-to-mucosa with continuous suturing if Blumgart technique expertise is unavailable, as this still outperforms invagination for clinically relevant fistulas 3, 4

  3. Reserve invagination technique only when duct-to-mucosa is technically impossible due to anatomic constraints 5

  4. In trauma settings requiring staged reconstruction, either pancreato-jejunostomy or pancreato-gastrostomy may be selected based on surgeon experience and injury pattern 6

Key Risk Factors Requiring Technical Adjustment

  • Pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm significantly increases fistula risk regardless of technique, requiring meticulous attention to anastomotic detail 7, 4
  • Soft pancreatic texture increases fistula risk and may benefit from Blumgart's gentle compression approach 7
  • Male sex and higher body mass index independently predict fistula formation 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not overtighten trans-pancreatic U-sutures in Blumgart technique, as this compromises blood supply and increases rather than decreases fistula risk 1
  • Avoid routine use of octreotide, fibrin glue, or pancreatic duct stents, as none reduce fistula rates in prospective randomized trials 1, 8
  • Do not rely on drain amylase alone for fistula diagnosis; it has limited sensitivity and specificity (AUC 0.869) and serves primarily as an exclusion tool 8

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.