Could a woman with low‑grade squamous intra‑epithelial lesion (LSIL) and negative high‑risk human papillomavirus (HPV) tests now and 14 months ago have adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Could This Patient Have Adenocarcinoma In Situ?

While theoretically possible, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is extremely unlikely in this patient with LSIL and persistently negative high-risk HPV testing. The combination of two negative HPV tests 14 months apart makes AIS highly improbable, though not impossible due to the distinct biology of glandular lesions.

Why AIS is Unlikely in This Clinical Scenario

HPV Association with AIS

  • AIS is strongly HPV-associated, with high-risk HPV DNA detected in 71-93% of women with cytologic AIS and 75% of those with histologically confirmed AIS 1
  • The presence of two negative HPV tests separated by 14 months substantially reduces the probability of underlying AIS, as most glandular lesions harbor detectable high-risk HPV 1

Epidemiologic Rarity

  • AIS incidence is exceptionally low at only 1.25 per 100,000 women, compared to 41.4 per 100,000 for squamous carcinoma in situ 2
  • This represents approximately a 33-fold lower incidence than high-grade squamous lesions 2

Cytologic Presentation

  • LSIL cytology is predominantly a squamous lesion reflecting HPV infection, not typically associated with glandular abnormalities 3, 4
  • AIS is more commonly detected in women with atypical glandular cells (AGC) or AGC-favor neoplasia on cytology, not LSIL 1

Critical Caveats About AIS Detection

Screening Limitations

  • Pap smear screening is notoriously unsatisfactory for detecting AIS, as the disease often lacks reliable cytologic or colposcopic features 5
  • Colposcopic changes associated with AIS can be minimal, making visual identification difficult even during directed examination 2

Biological Characteristics That Complicate Detection

  • AIS frequently extends into the endocervical canal, beyond the reach of standard cytologic sampling 2
  • The lesion can be multifocal with skip areas, meaning negative sampling does not definitively exclude disease 2, 5
  • Most AIS lesions lie within 1 cm of the squamocolumnar junction, but skip lesions, while rare, do occur 5

Recommended Management Approach

Standard LSIL Management Takes Precedence

  • Proceed with colposcopy as recommended for adult women with LSIL cytology 3, 4
  • At colposcopy, perform directed biopsies of any abnormal areas on the ectocervix and consider endocervical sampling 3
  • If colposcopy confirms CIN 1 or is negative, follow with repeat cytology at 6-12 months or HPV testing at 12 months 3, 4

When to Heighten Suspicion for Glandular Disease

  • If repeat cytology shows atypical glandular cells (AGC) rather than squamous abnormalities, this warrants immediate colposcopy with endocervical sampling 1
  • Any persistent abnormal cytology despite negative HPV testing should prompt consideration of sampling adequacy issues or glandular pathology 6
  • Visible glandular abnormalities at colposcopy (though rare) require targeted biopsy and endocervical curettage 5

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume negative HPV testing completely excludes AIS, as 25-29% of AIS cases may be HPV-negative by current testing methods 1
  • Do not rely solely on cytology for AIS detection, as Pap screening has poor sensitivity for glandular lesions 5
  • Do not dismiss persistent cytologic abnormalities in the setting of negative HPV tests, as this may represent either false-negative HPV testing or glandular pathology 6
  • Ensure adequate endocervical sampling during colposcopy, as a larger cervical os may compromise HPV sample adequacy 6

Bottom Line

The probability of AIS in this patient is very low given the LSIL cytology and two negative HPV tests. However, proceed with standard LSIL management including colposcopy with endocervical assessment 3, 4. If any glandular abnormalities are suspected cytologically or colposcopically, or if abnormal cytology persists despite negative HPV testing, escalate evaluation with endocervical curettage and consider diagnostic excisional procedure 2, 5.

Related Questions

In a 48‑year‑old woman with a low‑grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) on Pap smear and a negative high‑risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test, does she have a risk of high‑grade dysplasia or carcinoma?
What human papillomavirus (HPV) type is a 26-year-old woman with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) on her Pap (Papanicolaou) smear most likely infected with?
How is Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) acquired?
What are the next steps for a sexually active female of reproductive age with a positive Pap smear showing Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and Squamous Cell Lesions (SLIL)?
What are the ongoing considerations for a 42-year-old female (YOF) with a history of Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) on Papanicolaou (PAP) smear 6 years ago and several subsequent negative smears?
What is the appropriate management for a first-degree (superficial) burn?
What single dose of dexamethasone is recommended for a 10‑month‑old infant with croup?
Is it safe to co‑prescribe naltrexone with aripiprazole, and what monitoring or dose adjustments are required?
What is the appropriate next therapeutic adjustment for an adult with type 2 diabetes on Humalog 75/25 (insulin lispro protamine suspension) 23 units twice daily, empagliflozin (Jardiance) 10 mg daily, and semaglutide (Ozempic) 2 mg weekly, whose continuous glucose monitor shows time‑in‑range 70‑180 mg/dL 75%, 181‑250 mg/dL 23% and glucose management indicator 7.1% (estimated average glucose 154 mg/dL)?
How should a nondisplaced Salter‑Harris type I fracture of the distal tibial growth plate in a child be managed?
What are the side effects of naltrexone and what monitoring is recommended?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.