What is the likelihood that a woman with a low‑grade squamous intra‑epithelial lesion and two consecutive negative high‑risk human papillomavirus tests performed 14 months apart has any other form of invasive cervical cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Non-HPV-Related Invasive Cervical Cancer with LSIL and Two Negative HPV Tests

The likelihood that this woman has any form of invasive cervical cancer is extraordinarily low—approaching zero—because virtually all cervical cancers (>99%) are caused by high-risk HPV, and two consecutive negative HPV tests 14 months apart provide exceptionally strong reassurance against both current disease and future risk. 1

HPV as the Necessary Cause of Cervical Cancer

  • High-risk HPV infection is required for the development of virtually all cervical cancers worldwide, with approximately 15 carcinogenic HPV types accounting for essentially 100% of cases 1
  • HPV-16 accounts for 50-60% of invasive squamous cell carcinomas, and HPV-18 accounts for an additional 10-15%, with other high-risk types comprising the remainder 1
  • For adenocarcinoma specifically, HPV-16 accounts for approximately 40% and HPV-18 for 30% of cases 1
  • There is no established pathway to invasive cervical cancer that does not involve persistent high-risk HPV infection 1

Negative Predictive Value of HPV Testing

  • The pooled sensitivity of HPV testing for identifying high-grade lesions (CIN3+) reaches 90% by 6 months after initial testing and remains at this level for at least 24 months, substantially exceeding the 70% sensitivity of cytology alone 1
  • The 6-year risk of CIN3+ following a single negative HPV test is only 0.27%, compared to 0.97% following negative cytology alone 1
  • Two consecutive negative HPV tests performed 14 months apart provide even greater reassurance than a single test, as the negative predictive value compounds with serial testing 1

Natural History Context for LSIL

  • Most HPV infections, even by carcinogenic types, are transient and resolve within 1-2 years, causing only mild cytopathologic changes including LSIL 1
  • Approximately 75% of low-grade lesions in adults and 90% in adolescents resolve spontaneously without treatment 1
  • The stepwise development from HPV acquisition to invasive cancer takes an average of 20 years, with the longest interval being from high-grade lesions to invasion 1
  • Persistent carcinogenic HPV infection is the prerequisite for progression to high-grade lesions and ultimately cancer 1

HPV-Negative LSIL: A Distinct Consideration

  • Only 3-11% of women with LSIL have negative results on both Hybrid Capture 2 and PCR-based HPV testing 2
  • The absolute risk of CIN3/carcinoma over 2 years for women with HPV-negative LSIL is only 2-4%, compared to 13-19% for oncogenic HPV-positive LSIL 2
  • HPV-negative LSIL likely represents cytologic misinterpretation, falsely negative HPV tests due to sampling issues, or benign mimics rather than a distinct biologic entity related to cervical cancer risk 2
  • At 6-month follow-up, 12-32% of women initially classified as HPV-negative LSIL subsequently test HPV-positive, suggesting transient false-negative results 2

Clinical Bottom Line

Given that:

  1. Virtually all invasive cervical cancers require persistent high-risk HPV infection 1
  2. Two negative HPV tests 14 months apart indicate no detectable high-risk HPV 1
  3. The negative predictive value of serial HPV testing is exceptionally high 1
  4. Even HPV-negative LSIL carries only a 2-4% risk of CIN3+ over 2 years, not invasive cancer 2

The probability of any form of invasive cervical cancer—whether squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma—is negligible in this clinical scenario. The LSIL finding likely represents a benign reactive change, cytologic misinterpretation, or a lesion that has already regressed given the negative HPV tests 2.

Important Caveats

  • Rare non-HPV-related cervical malignancies (such as clear cell adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, or sarcomas) exist but are extraordinarily uncommon and would not typically present as LSIL on cytology 1
  • If clinical symptoms develop (abnormal vaginal bleeding, discharge, or pelvic pain) despite reassuring screening results, direct visualization and biopsy of any visible lesion is mandatory regardless of HPV status 1
  • Follow-up with repeat cytology at 6-12 months or HPV testing at 12 months remains appropriate to ensure the LSIL has resolved and to detect any interval development of HPV positivity 3

Related Questions

Which Human Papillomavirus (HPV) causes Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) on Pap smear?
Can individuals with Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL) receive Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination?
What are the ongoing considerations for a 42-year-old female (YOF) with a history of Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) on Papanicolaou (PAP) smear 6 years ago and several subsequent negative smears?
What is the recommended management for a 29‑year‑old woman with a low‑grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) on Pap test and a negative high‑risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test?
Does a low‑grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) on a Pap smear require referral to a gynecologist?
What is the appropriate next therapeutic adjustment for an adult with type 2 diabetes on Humalog 75/25 (insulin lispro protamine suspension) 23 units twice daily, empagliflozin (Jardiance) 10 mg daily, and semaglutide (Ozempic) 2 mg weekly, whose continuous glucose monitor shows time‑in‑range 70‑180 mg/dL 75%, 181‑250 mg/dL 23% and glucose management indicator 7.1% (estimated average glucose 154 mg/dL)?
How should a nondisplaced Salter‑Harris type I fracture of the distal tibial growth plate in a child be managed?
What are the side effects of naltrexone and what monitoring is recommended?
What is the appropriate treatment for a Bartholin's gland cyst?
What is the appropriate management for a patient with a serum potassium of 5.4 mEq/L and an elevated blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio of 22:1?
Can telmisartan cause hyponatremia?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.