What is Endoaneurysmorrhaphy (Endovascular Aneurysm Repair)?
Endoaneurysmorrhaphy, more commonly known as endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a stent graft deployed through the femoral arteries to exclude an abdominal aortic aneurysm from circulation, thereby preventing rupture while maintaining blood flow through the graft. 1
Definition and Mechanism
- EVAR involves inserting a stent graft endovascularly to exclude the aneurysm sac from blood flow while maintaining antegrade flow through the graft, avoiding the need for major abdominal surgery 1
- The procedure is performed through small groin incisions, accessing the femoral arteries to deliver the stent graft to the aneurysm site 2
Application for a 78-Year-Old Woman with Infrarenal AAA
For a 78-year-old woman with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and suitable anatomy, EVAR is the preferred treatment approach if her life expectancy exceeds 2 years. 3
Treatment Decision Algorithm
Step 1: Assess Life Expectancy
- If life expectancy is less than 2 years, elective AAA repair is not recommended 4, 5
- If life expectancy exceeds 2 years, proceed to anatomic evaluation 4
Step 2: Obtain Pre-operative Imaging
- Cardiovascular CT (CCT) is the optimal imaging modality to assess the entire aorta and determine EVAR feasibility 4
- Imaging must evaluate aneurysm size, extent, rate of growth, and suitability for endovascular repair 3
Step 3: Determine Treatment Based on Anatomy
- If anatomy is suitable for EVAR: This is the preferred approach, offering perioperative mortality <1% compared to 4.3% with open repair 3, 4
- If anatomy is unsuitable for EVAR: Open repair remains indicated for patients who are good surgical candidates 3
- If patient cannot comply with lifelong surveillance: Open repair is reasonable despite being a good surgical candidate 3
Advantages of EVAR Over Open Repair
- EVAR demonstrates significantly lower procedural mortality (1.8% vs 4.3% for open repair) 3
- Reduced perioperative morbidity compared to open surgical repair 3, 2, 1
- Shorter hospitalization and faster recovery 1
- However, long-term outcomes show clinical equivalence between EVAR and open repair, with similar all-cause mortality (7.5 vs 7.7 deaths per 100 person-years) and aneurysm-related mortality (1.0 vs 1.2 deaths per 100 person-years) at 6-year follow-up 3
Critical Requirement: Lifelong Surveillance
EVAR requires mandatory lifelong imaging surveillance, which is the most significant disadvantage compared to open repair. 3, 4
- Endoleaks occur in up to one-third of patients and are the most common complication 4, 5
- Type I and Type III endoleaks require immediate correction to prevent rupture 3, 4, 5
- Type II endoleaks occur in approximately 25% of patients but may spontaneously seal 5
- Surveillance imaging should be performed at 6-12 months post-procedure, then annually for 5 years to monitor for endoleaks, graft migration, and aneurysm sac changes 4
- Reintervention rates are significantly higher with EVAR (5.1%) compared to open repair (1.7%) 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume EVAR is appropriate for high-risk patients with severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal disease—the effectiveness in this population is uncertain despite historical recommendations 3
- Do not neglect to confirm the patient can comply with lifelong surveillance requirements before choosing EVAR over open repair 3
- Do not delay treatment if the aneurysm is symptomatic—symptoms indicate impending rupture regardless of size and warrant urgent repair 4
- For saccular aneurysms specifically, do not wait for the standard 55 mm threshold—repair is warranted at ≥45 mm due to higher rupture risk 4, 5