What are the WHO and ADA diagnostic criteria for pre‑diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Pre-Diabetes: WHO and ADA Guidelines

Direct Answer

Both the WHO and ADA define pre-diabetes using fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test thresholds, but they differ on the lower fasting glucose cutoff and HbA1c criteria. 1


ADA Diagnostic Criteria for Pre-Diabetes

The American Diabetes Association recognizes three laboratory thresholds for diagnosing pre-diabetes, any one of which is sufficient: 1, 2

  • HbA1c: 5.7–6.4% (39–47 mmol/mol) measured in an NGSP-certified laboratory 1, 2
  • Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG): 100–125 mg/dL (5.6–6.9 mmol/L) after ≥8-hour fast 1
  • Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT): 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L) at 2 hours during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test 1

The ADA lowered the IFG threshold from 110 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL in 2003 to equalize the risk of progression to diabetes between IFG and IGT categories. 3


WHO Diagnostic Criteria for Pre-Diabetes

The World Health Organization uses more conservative thresholds and does not endorse HbA1c for pre-diabetes diagnosis: 1, 3

  • Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG): 110–125 mg/dL (6.1–6.9 mmol/L) with 2-hour glucose <140 mg/dL 1
  • Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT): 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L) at 2 hours during OGTT, with fasting glucose <126 mg/dL 1
  • HbA1c is NOT recommended by WHO for diagnosing pre-diabetes 3

The WHO maintains the higher IFG cutoff of 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) because it identifies individuals at genuinely elevated risk for progression to diabetes, whereas the ADA's lower threshold captures many who will spontaneously revert to normal. 3


Key Differences Between WHO and ADA Criteria

Fasting Glucose Threshold

The most significant divergence is the IFG lower limit: ADA uses 100 mg/dL while WHO uses 110 mg/dL. 1, 3 This 10 mg/dL difference has major epidemiologic implications—the ADA criteria classify approximately 50% more individuals as having pre-diabetes. 3

HbA1c for Pre-Diabetes

The ADA endorses HbA1c 5.7–6.4% for pre-diabetes diagnosis; the WHO explicitly rejects HbA1c for this purpose. 3 The European guidelines and Canadian Diabetes Association have adopted an intermediate position, recommending HbA1c 6.0–6.4% (42–47 mmol/mol) for pre-diabetes. 3

2-Hour OGTT Values

Both organizations agree on the IGT threshold of 140–199 mg/dL at 2 hours, though the WHO places greater emphasis on performing OGTTs to detect IGT, which carries independent cardiovascular risk. 1, 4


Clinical Implications of Differing Criteria

Progression Risk

The WHO criteria identify individuals at higher absolute risk of progression to diabetes. 3 With ADA criteria, approximately one-half of those diagnosed with pre-diabetes test normal on repeat testing, one-third spontaneously revert to normal over time, and two-thirds never develop diabetes in their lifetimes. 3

Test Selection

Fasting plasma glucose alone misses the majority of pre-diabetes cases, particularly in high-risk populations. 5 In a cohort of young African Americans, FPG testing detected only 27.4% of pre-diabetic individuals, whereas a complete OGTT detected 87.1%. 5 Even lowering the IFG threshold to 100 mg/dL identified only 13 of 45 IGT-only cases. 5

Cardiovascular Risk

IGT carries independent cardiovascular disease risk beyond diabetes progression, whereas IFG primarily predicts future diabetes. 4, 6 This distinction supports the WHO's emphasis on OGTT performance when cardiovascular risk stratification is the goal. 6


Practical Testing Recommendations

Which Test to Use

All three tests (HbA1c, fasting glucose, OGTT) are equally appropriate for detecting pre-diabetes according to ADA guidelines. 1, 2 However:

  • HbA1c offers the greatest convenience (no fasting required) and superior pre-analytical stability 1, 2
  • Fasting plasma glucose is most practical for routine screening but has 12–15% day-to-day variability 2
  • OGTT is most sensitive but cumbersome and poorly reproducible 1, 5

When HbA1c Cannot Be Used

Use plasma glucose criteria exclusively in these conditions: 1, 2

  • Pregnancy (second/third trimesters)
  • Hemoglobinopathies (sickle cell disease/trait)
  • Hemodialysis
  • Recent blood loss or transfusion
  • Erythropoietin therapy
  • G6PD deficiency (lowers HbA1c by ~0.7–0.8% in homozygotes) 2

Screening and Follow-Up

Who Should Be Screened

Universal screening should begin at age 45 years; earlier screening is indicated for adults with BMI ≥25 kg/m² (≥23 kg/m² in Asians) plus any additional risk factor: 1, 2

  • First-degree relative with diabetes
  • High-risk ethnicity (African American, Latino, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander)
  • History of cardiovascular disease
  • Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg or on therapy)
  • HDL <35 mg/dL or triglycerides >250 mg/dL
  • Polycystic ovary syndrome
  • Physical inactivity
  • Prior gestational diabetes
  • Clinical insulin resistance (severe obesity, acanthosis nigricans)

Testing Intervals

  • Normal results: repeat every 3 years minimum 1, 2
  • Pre-diabetes diagnosed: annual testing 1, 2
  • History of gestational diabetes: lifelong screening every 3 years 1

Common Pitfalls

Over-Reliance on Fasting Glucose

Do not screen high-risk populations with fasting glucose alone—this approach misses 70–85% of IGT cases, particularly in African Americans and other high-risk ethnic groups. 5

Ignoring Test Limitations

Confirm borderline results with repeat testing on a separate day because fasting glucose has 12–15% day-to-day variability that can mimic true metabolic change. 2 When results are near diagnostic thresholds, repeat testing in 3–6 months. 1

Using Point-of-Care HbA1c

Point-of-care HbA1c assays lack the analytical precision required for diagnostic purposes—only NGSP-certified laboratory assays should be used. 2

Misapplying HbA1c in Anemia

Marked discrepancies between HbA1c and plasma glucose should prompt suspicion of unreliable HbA1c results due to altered red blood cell turnover. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Screening Recommendations for Diabetes Mellitus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Risk and management of pre-diabetes.

European journal of preventive cardiology, 2019

Research

The utility of fasting glucose for detection of prediabetes.

Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2006

Research

[Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus].

Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology, 1999

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.