Can you interpret this electrocardiogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Interpretation: A Systematic Approach

I cannot interpret a specific electrocardiogram without seeing the actual tracing. However, I can provide you with the standardized, evidence-based framework for systematic ECG interpretation that you should apply to any ECG.

Systematic Interpretation Algorithm

Step 1: Verify Technical Quality and Accuracy

Before interpreting any ECG finding, you must verify proper electrode placement and recording quality. 1, 2

  • Check for precordial lead misplacement: Superior placement of V1-V2 (at 2nd or 3rd intercostal space instead of 4th) reduces R-wave amplitude by approximately 0.1 mV per interspace, creating artifactual poor R-wave progression that mimics anterior infarction 3, 4
  • Verify baseline stability: Look for baseline wander, electrical interference, or poor electrode contact that compromises automated measurements 2
  • Never accept computer-generated interpretation without physician verification: Automated systems produce frequent errors and are not recognized as properly interpreted ECGs 1, 3
  • Check for pacemaker artifacts: Modern low-amplitude bipolar pacing may be missed by automated systems, leading to incorrect heart rate calculations 2

Step 2: Calculate Heart Rate

  • Count QRS complexes in a 6-second strip and multiply by 10, or use 300 divided by the number of large boxes between consecutive R waves 3
  • Significant heart rate change: A change of ≥20 bpm crossing thresholds of 50 or 100 bpm constitutes clinically significant change requiring correlation 1, 2
  • Normal range: 60-100 bpm in adults; sinus bradycardia (<60 bpm) down to 30 bpm is physiologic in athletes 3

Step 3: Identify Rhythm

  • Sinus rhythm criteria: P wave before each QRS with consistent PR interval 3
  • Note irregularities: Premature beats, pauses, or completely irregular patterns suggesting atrial fibrillation 3

Step 4: Measure Intervals

PR Interval (Normal: 120-200 ms):

  • Assess AV conduction 3
  • PR interval normally correlates positively with R-R interval but becomes negative with fetal stress (catecholamine effect) 5

QRS Duration (Normal: <120 ms):

  • Identify ventricular conduction delays 3
  • Measure in a lead with an initial Q wave for accuracy 3

QT Interval:

  • Use Fridericia formula (QTcFri) rather than Bazett formula (QTcB): QTcFri is more accurate across heart rate ranges and reduces false-positive prolonged QT diagnoses by 21% 6
  • Normal QTc: <450 ms for men, <460 ms for women 3
  • Significant change: QTc change ≥60 ms 1
  • Severe prolongation: QTc >500 ms 6

Step 5: Determine Electrical Axis

Using leads I and aVF: 3

  • Normal axis: +90° to -30° (positive in both I and aVF)
  • Left axis deviation: -30° to -90° (positive in I, negative in aVF)
  • Right axis deviation: +90° to +180° (negative in I, positive in aVF)
  • Extreme axis deviation: +180° to -90° (negative in both I and aVF)

Step 6: Assess for Conduction Abnormalities

Complete LBBB: 1

  • QRS duration ≥120 ms in adults
  • Broad notched or slurred R wave in leads I, aVL, V5, V6
  • Absent q waves in leads I, V5, V6
  • R peak time >60 ms in V5 and V6

Complete RBBB: 1

  • QRS duration ≥120 ms in adults
  • Terminal rightward deflection
  • rSR' pattern in V1-V2

Left Anterior Fascicular Block: 1

  • Frontal plane axis between -45° and -90°
  • qR pattern in lead aVL
  • R-peak time in aVL ≥45 ms
  • QRS duration <120 ms

Step 7: Evaluate for Chamber Enlargement

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: 3

  • Sokolow-Lyon criterion: S in V1 + R in V5 or V6 >3.5 mV
  • Note: QRS voltage criteria decline with age and vary by population 3

Step 8: Assess for Ischemia, Injury, or Infarction

ST-Segment Elevation: 3

  • Acute injury: >0.1 mV in limb leads or >0.15-0.2 mV in precordial leads
  • Distinguish from Brugada pattern: Coved-type ST elevation in V1-V2 with downsloping morphology indicates arrhythmia risk 3
  • Distinguish from early repolarization: J-point elevation with upward-concave ST segment, common in athletes and generally benign 3

ST-Segment Depression: 1

  • Suggests ischemia when ≥0.1 mV horizontal or downsloping

T-Wave Abnormalities: 4

  • Lateral T-wave abnormalities ≥1 mm depth in ≥2 contiguous leads (V5-V6, I, aVL): Associated with cardiomyopathy; requires echocardiography and potentially cardiac MRI with gadolinium 4
  • Normal variants: T-wave inversion in V1-V3 is normal in children >1 month 3

Pathological Q Waves: 3

  • Duration >0.04 seconds or >25% of R-wave amplitude
  • Suggests myocardial infarction
  • Note location to determine coronary territory

Poor R-Wave Progression: 4

  • First verify proper V1-V2 placement before attributing to pathology
  • If placement correct, obtain echocardiography to evaluate for wall-motion abnormalities, hypertrophy, or cardiomyopathy 4

Step 9: Identify Special Patterns

Pre-excitation (WPW): 3

  • Shortened PR interval with delta wave

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: 3

  • Deep Q waves, markedly inverted T waves, unusually high voltage amplitudes

Step 10: Compare with Previous ECGs

Significant changes requiring documentation: 1

  • New or worsened ischemia or infarction
  • New conduction abnormality
  • Significant repolarization change
  • Change in clinical status (axis, voltage, chamber hypertrophy)

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never interpret ECG in isolation: Always integrate with clinical presentation—the same finding has different implications depending on symptoms 1, 3
  • Verify electrode placement first: Misplacement is extremely common (>33% of recordings) and creates false diagnoses 2, 3
  • Recognize age-specific variants: Sinus bradycardia to 30 bpm in athletes, T-wave inversions in V1-V3 in children 3
  • Different ECG machines use different algorithms: Measurements can vary substantially between systems even from the same cardiac activity 2
  • Inadequate filtering distorts waveforms: Minimum 150 Hz high-frequency response for adults, 250 Hz for children 3

To interpret your specific ECG, apply this systematic approach to the actual tracing, verifying technical quality first, then proceeding through each step sequentially while maintaining clinical context.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Approach to Discrepant Heart Rates on Two ECGs

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

EKG Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

ECG Pattern Interpretation for Cardiac Pathology

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The ECG waveform.

Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology, 1987

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.