Can the PORTEC‑3 adjuvant protocol be used for a 61‑year‑old woman with mixed endometrial carcinoma (30 % endometrioid grade 2, 70 % serous with p53 mutation), 4.5 cm tumor, 86 % myometrial invasion, lymph‑vascular space invasion, and FIGO 2023 stage IICm (pT1bN0)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PORTEC-3 Protocol for Mixed Endometrial Carcinoma with Serous Component and p53 Mutation

Yes, you should use the PORTEC-3 protocol for this patient—combined chemoradiotherapy (EBRT 48.6 Gy with concurrent cisplatin followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel) is the recommended treatment given her high-risk features: predominantly serous histology (70%), p53 mutation, deep myometrial invasion (86%), and LVSI. 1, 2

Why This Patient Qualifies for PORTEC-3

Meeting PORTEC-3 Eligibility Criteria

  • The PORTEC-3 trial specifically enrolled patients with stage I-III serous or clear cell endometrial cancer, making this patient's 70% serous component with p53 mutation a direct indication for the protocol. 1

  • Stage IICm (pT1bN0) with 86% myometrial invasion, LVSI, and high-grade histology places her squarely in the high-risk category that PORTEC-3 was designed to treat. 1

  • Mixed carcinomas with a serous component behave according to their most aggressive histologic element—the 70% serous component with p53 mutation dominates the prognosis and treatment approach. 3, 4

Evidence Supporting Combined Chemoradiotherapy

Survival Benefit in High-Risk Disease

  • The PORTEC-3 trial demonstrated 5-year overall survival of 81.4% with chemoradiotherapy versus 76.1% with radiotherapy alone (HR 0.70, p=0.034), with the greatest benefit seen in patients with serous cancers and stage III disease. 1, 2

  • Molecular analysis of PORTEC-3 showed that p53-abnormal tumors (which includes serous carcinomas) had 5-year recurrence-free survival of 59% with chemoradiotherapy versus only 36% with radiotherapy alone—a 23% absolute improvement. 5, 2

  • The updated PORTEC-3 analysis with 72.6 months median follow-up confirmed significant improvement in both overall survival and failure-free survival with combined treatment. 1

Why Radiotherapy Alone Is Insufficient

  • Serous carcinomas with p53 abnormality have high rates of distant metastasis that cannot be controlled by pelvic radiotherapy alone, necessitating systemic chemotherapy. 1, 4

  • The GOG-258 trial showed that chemotherapy alone resulted in significantly more vaginal and pelvic/para-aortic recurrences compared to chemoradiotherapy, establishing that both modalities are needed. 2

The PORTEC-3 Treatment Protocol

Standard Regimen Components

  • External beam radiotherapy: 48.6 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions to the pelvis. 1, 2

  • Concurrent chemotherapy: Cisplatin 50 mg/m² on days 1 and 28 of radiotherapy. 1, 2

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy: Four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m² following completion of radiotherapy. 1, 2

  • Timing: Adjuvant therapy should be initiated as soon as the vaginal cuff has healed, but no later than 12 weeks after surgery. 1

Risk Stratification Based on Molecular Features

P53 Mutation as High-Risk Marker

  • P53 mutations occur in 91.66% of serous carcinomas and define them as high-risk regardless of stage, with significantly worse prognosis than endometrioid tumors. 6, 4

  • All stages and all histologies with p53-abnormal status and myometrial invasion are classified as high-risk endometrial cancer requiring combined modality therapy. 1

  • Mixed carcinomas with serous component show TP53 mutations in 22% overall, but when the serous component predominates (as in this case with 70%), the tumor behaves like pure serous carcinoma. 3

Deep Myometrial Invasion and LVSI

  • The combination of 86% myometrial invasion (deep invasion) plus LVSI substantially increases both locoregional and distant recurrence risk, reinforcing the need for combined chemoradiotherapy. 2

  • LVSI-positive disease markedly increases distant recurrence risk and is a strong indication for systemic chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy. 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Undertreat Based on Stage Alone

  • Stage IICm (pT1bN0) might appear "early" but the combination of serous histology, p53 mutation, deep invasion, and LVSI creates high-risk biology that requires aggressive treatment regardless of node-negative status. 1

  • Observation or vaginal brachytherapy alone would be grossly inadequate for this patient and is contraindicated in high-risk disease with unstaged or negative nodes. 2

Do Not Use Radiotherapy Alone

  • Pelvic radiotherapy alone fails to address the high risk of distant metastasis in p53-abnormal serous carcinomas, as demonstrated by the 36% 5-year RFS in the radiotherapy-only arm of PORTEC-3. 5

Do Not Use Chemotherapy Alone

  • The GOG-249 trial showed that substituting chemotherapy plus vaginal brachytherapy for pelvic radiotherapy resulted in no improvement in recurrence-free survival and significantly worse acute toxicity. 1

Expected Toxicity Profile

Acute Toxicity During Treatment

  • Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occur in 60% of chemoradiotherapy patients versus 12% with radiotherapy alone, with most grade 3 events being hematological (45%). 2

  • Acute grade 2 adverse events occur in 94% of patients receiving chemotherapy/brachytherapy versus 44% with radiotherapy alone. 1

Long-Term Toxicity

  • Persistent sensory neuropathy occurs in 6% of patients at 5 years, with grade 2 sensory neuropathy at 24 months in 10% versus <1% with radiotherapy alone. 1, 2

Alternative Considerations (Not Recommended for This Patient)

When PORTEC-3 Might Not Apply

  • POLE-ultramutated tumors show excellent prognosis (98% 5-year RFS) without chemotherapy benefit, but this patient has p53 mutation indicating serous carcinoma, not POLE mutation. 5, 4

  • Pure endometrioid grade 1-2 tumors with <50% invasion and no LVSI can be observed or treated with vaginal brachytherapy alone, but this patient's 70% serous component excludes this approach. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

High-Risk Endometrial Cancer Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020

Related Questions

What were the results of the Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) 3 trial?
What were the aims, outcomes, and practice-changing evidence of the Portec 3 trial for high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women?
What are the recommendations for participating in the Portec (Portec trials) clinical trials?
Did the PORTEC-3 trial provide treatment-changing guidelines for high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women?
How much can pelvic physical therapy improve external anal sphincter strength after a fistulotomy?
What is the recommended adjuvant management for a 61‑year‑old woman who underwent robotic total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy, sentinel‑node mapping and omental biopsy for a mixed endometrial carcinoma (30 % endometrioid grade 2, 70 % serous with p53 mutation), tumor size 4.5 cm, 86 % myometrial invasion, lymph‑vascular space invasion present, no cervical, serosal, nodal, omental or peritoneal involvement, negative peritoneal washings, pathologic stage pT1bN0 corresponding to FIGO 2023 stage IICm?
What antibiotic options are available for treating carbapenem‑resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection in critically ill patients?
Can a patient with controlled blood pressure on antihypertensive therapy discontinue the medication, and if not, what is the recommended tapering protocol?
What is the recommended management of a large bowel obstruction?
What is the current step‑by‑step management algorithm for MASLD (metabolic dysfunction‑associated steatotic liver disease) and how does it differ from previous NAFLD (non‑alcoholic fatty liver disease) guidelines?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.