In an adult with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)‑associated peptic ulcer disease, when is imaging indicated and which imaging modalities are appropriate for uncomplicated disease versus alarm features or complications?

Imaging for H. pylori-Associated Peptic Ulcer Disease

Imaging is not routinely indicated for uncomplicated H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease in adults, as endoscopy remains the diagnostic gold standard; however, CT imaging becomes essential when complications such as perforation, bleeding, or obstruction are suspected based on alarm features. 1

Uncomplicated Peptic Ulcer Disease: No Routine Imaging Needed

For patients with uncomplicated H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease, imaging plays no role in initial diagnosis or management:

• Endoscopy, not imaging, is the definitive diagnostic test for peptic ulcer disease, allowing direct visualization, biopsy for H. pylori testing, and exclusion of malignancy 1
• Young patients (<45-55 years) without alarm symptoms can be managed with H. pylori test-and-treat strategies without any imaging or endoscopy 1
• CT is not the test of choice for suspected uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease, even though patients may present with nonspecific symptoms and undergo CT as an initial emergency department evaluation 1

The key distinction here is that while CT may incidentally detect deep ulcers or secondary signs of gastroduodenitis, it should not be ordered specifically for this purpose in uncomplicated cases 2, 3.

When Imaging Becomes Mandatory: Alarm Features and Complications

CT scan of the abdomen is strongly recommended when complications are suspected, particularly perforation, which represents a surgical emergency with mortality rates up to 30%:

Suspected Perforation

• CT scan is the preferred imaging modality for suspected perforated peptic ulcer, providing superior sensitivity for detecting free air, contained leaks, and peritonitis 1
• Chest/abdominal X-ray should be performed initially only when CT is not promptly available, though X-ray detects free air in only 30-85% of perforations 1
• Water-soluble contrast (oral or via nasogastric tube) should be added when free air is not seen on imaging but clinical suspicion remains high 1

Alarm Features Requiring Imaging

Patients presenting with the following alarm features warrant immediate imaging evaluation:

• Age >45-55 years with new-onset dyspepsia (increased gastric cancer risk) 1
• Weight loss, progressive dysphagia, recurrent vomiting 1
• Evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, anemia) 1
• Palpable abdominal mass 1
• Sudden onset severe abdominal pain with peritoneal signs (suggests perforation) 1

CT Findings in Peptic Ulcer Disease

When CT is performed, radiologists should recognize these key findings:

Uncomplicated Ulcers

• Gastric or duodenal wall thickening (≥5 mm) due to submucosal edema 1
• Mucosal hyperenhancement indicating inflammation 1
• Focal outpouching of mucosa representing the ulcer crater 1
• Focal interruption of mucosal enhancement where the ulcer erodes through epithelial layers 1

Complicated Ulcers

• Free intraperitoneal air indicating perforation 1
• Hyperdense blood products at the ulcer site or in the stomach/duodenum indicating active bleeding 1
• Gastric outlet obstruction from chronic inflammatory changes near the pylorus 1
• Extraluminal fluid collections suggesting contained perforation or abscess 2

Critical Clinical Algorithm

For patients <45-55 years without alarm symptoms:

• Test for H. pylori (urea breath test or stool antigen preferred) 1
• If positive, treat with eradication therapy 1
• No imaging indicated 1

For patients ≥45-55 years OR any age with alarm symptoms:

• Proceed directly to upper endoscopy, not imaging 1
• Obtain biopsies for H. pylori and to exclude malignancy 1

For patients with acute abdomen/suspected perforation:

• Obtain CT scan immediately as first-line imaging 1
• If CT unavailable, obtain chest/abdominal X-ray 1
• Add water-soluble contrast if initial imaging negative but suspicion persists 1

For patients with suspected bleeding:

• Endoscopy remains the diagnostic and therapeutic modality of choice 1
• CT angiography may be considered for active bleeding to guide embolization 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Do not order CT to diagnose uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease – endoscopy provides superior diagnostic accuracy and allows therapeutic intervention 1
• Do not rely on plain X-rays alone for suspected perforation, as they miss 15-70% of cases; CT is far more sensitive 1
• Do not assume negative imaging excludes perforation in patients with contained or sealed leaks, where peritonitis may be minimal or absent 1
• Do not forget that gastric ulcers require endoscopic biopsy to exclude malignancy, regardless of CT findings 1
• Beware of superficial ulcers remaining inconspicuous on CT – only deep ulcers with secondary mural changes are reliably detected 2, 3