What is the appropriate diagnostic work‑up and emergent management for a patient with suspected oesophageal rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) presenting with sudden severe chest or upper‑abdominal pain after forceful vomiting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Oesophageal Rupture (Boerhaave Syndrome): Diagnostic Work-Up and Emergent Management

Immediately obtain contrast-enhanced CT with CT esophagography in any patient presenting with severe chest or upper abdominal pain following forceful vomiting—this is the definitive diagnostic test with 92-100% sensitivity and must not be delayed. 1

Initial Diagnostic Approach

Immediate Actions (First 10-30 Minutes)

  • Obtain a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes to exclude myocardial infarction, but do not allow this to delay CT imaging when clinical suspicion is high. 1
  • Order contrast-enhanced CT of the chest immediately after ECG—delaying CT to obtain other studies first directly compromises survival outcomes. 1
  • Look for tachycardia (pulse >100 bpm) as the most critical vital sign abnormality that should raise immediate suspicion, along with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg indicating shock. 1

Key Clinical Features to Recognize

  • The classic Mackler's triad (chest pain, vomiting, subcutaneous emphysema) is rarely present—over 50% of cases have delayed diagnosis due to atypical presentation. 1
  • Chest pain occurs in 70% of cases, fever in 50%, dyspnea in 25%, and subcutaneous emphysema in only 19%. 1
  • Persistent rather than transient pain with rapid clinical deterioration suggests mediastinal contamination and developing sepsis. 1

Definitive Diagnostic Imaging

CT Findings That Confirm the Diagnosis

  • CT will demonstrate pneumomediastinum, left-sided pneumothorax, left-sided pleural effusion, subcutaneous emphysema, free intra-abdominal air, extraluminal air and food residue, and can directly visualize the perforation site. 1
  • Periesophageal fluid collections are present in 89-92% of esophageal perforations, and extraluminal air adjacent to the esophagus is present in 97% of perforations. 2
  • Esophageal wall thickening with periesophageal infiltration occurs in 72-75% of cases, and focal wall defects or absence of post-contrast wall enhancement indicate transmural necrosis. 2

When to Use Additional Diagnostic Modalities

  • Flexible endoscopy should be reserved for cases where CT findings are equivocal—it allows accurate diagnosis in >90% of cases and alters surgical management in 69% of patients. 3, 1
  • If endoscopy is performed, use low-flow insufflation with CO2 rather than air to minimize mediastinal contamination by preventing enlargement of the perforation. 3
  • Plain chest radiography alone is insufficient and may miss the diagnosis—reliance on X-ray should be avoided as it has up to 47% false-negative rate and misses 85% of pneumomediastinum cases. 2

Laboratory Studies

  • Baseline laboratory studies including complete blood count, C-reactive protein, serum lactate, and basic metabolic panel are non-specific and must never postpone CT imaging. 1

Immediate Management After Diagnosis

Time-Critical Treatment Principles

  • Time to diagnosis is the single most important predictor of survival—treatment initiated within 24 hours markedly improves outcomes, whereas delays beyond 24 hours raise mortality from a baseline of 10-20% to >50%. 1, 4
  • Delayed surgical treatment beyond 24 hours does not affect mortality rates but significantly reduces the odds of successful primary esophageal repair. 3

Initial Therapeutic Measures

  • Start broad-spectrum antibiotics covering both aerobic and anaerobic organisms immediately upon diagnosis. 1
  • Place the patient on nil per os (NPO) status without delay. 1
  • Initiate aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation for hemodynamic support. 1
  • Arrange urgent multidisciplinary consultation with gastrointestinal surgery, gastroenterology, and interventional radiology—this is now standardized practice given the complexity of decision-making regarding drainage, nutrition, stenting, and surgical intervention. 1

Surgical vs. Non-Operative Management Decision Algorithm

Indications for Immediate Surgical Treatment

  • Patients should undergo immediate surgical treatment if they have hemodynamic instability, obvious non-contained extravasation of contrast material, or systemic signs of severe sepsis. 3
  • Surgery should be undertaken as soon as possible—the literature consistently shows that delayed (>24 hours) surgical management results in increased morbidity and mortality rates. 3
  • The tear is typically located on the left posterolateral wall of the lower third of the thoracic esophagus with a characteristically large wall defect (3-8 cm) causing contamination of the left thorax with air and digestive contents. 4

Criteria for Non-Operative Management

  • Non-operative management can be offered only if the patient is hemodynamically stable, has contained perforation on imaging, and lacks systemic signs of severe sepsis. 3
  • Non-operative management requires intense monitoring in an ICU setting with surgical expertise and interventional radiology skills available around the clock. 3
  • Non-operative management includes NPO status, broad-spectrum antibiotics, endoscopic placement of nasogastric tube, early nutritional support (enteral feeding or total parenteral nutrition), and percutaneous radiological drainage of peri-esophageal collections. 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on the presence of the complete Mackler's triad—it is rarely present and waiting for all three features delays diagnosis. 1
  • Do not delay CT imaging to obtain contrast esophagography (barium or gastrografin swallow)—CT has replaced this as the first-line test because it provides comprehensive information on perforation location, extent, and associated complications. 1
  • Do not perform routine endoscopy in all cases—endoscopy carries a risk of enlarging the perforation through insufflation and should be reserved for equivocal CT findings. 1
  • Do not mistake this for myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, or aortic dissection—the history of forceful vomiting preceding chest pain is the key distinguishing feature. 5

References

Guideline

Boerhaave Syndrome Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Pneumomediastinum

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Esophageal Rupture Location and Characteristics in Boerhaave Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What condition did Boerhaave diagnose?
What is the differential diagnosis and management plan for a 21-year-old female with multiple episodes of vomiting, low-grade fever, and central chest pain that radiates up and down?
What is the most common location for an esophageal rupture or perforation in a patient with severe pleuritic chest pain radiating to the back after forceful vomiting?
In a patient presenting to the emergency department with severe retching and vomiting followed by sudden chest or epigastric pain, subcutaneous emphysema of the neck or chest, and dyspnea, how should Boerhaave syndrome be ruled out?
What is the appropriate emergency evaluation and management for a 53‑year‑old man who experienced syncope after breakfast, now has chest pain, cough, vomiting, normal glucose, and a hemoglobin of 20 g/dL?
What is the comprehensive approach to diagnosing and managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, including severity assessment, smoking cessation, vaccinations, pharmacologic therapy based on symptom burden and exacerbation history, acute exacerbation treatment, non‑pharmacologic measures, long‑term oxygen therapy, and potential surgical or adjunctive options?
What is the optimal anesthesia management for a patient with stage‑3 acute kidney injury and left‑ventricular ejection fraction of 45 % undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Can you explain the rationale, dosing regimen, contraindications, and monitoring required for combined intrathecal morphine and fentanyl analgesia in adult patients undergoing major surgery or severe cancer pain?
Can brucellosis mimic tuberculosis?
What is the appropriate management for a 31-year-old asymptomatic woman with impaired fasting glucose and borderline-high triglycerides?
For a 46‑year‑old woman, ECOG 1, with a sigmoid colon cancer adherent to the anterior uterus and a 1.8 cm hypodense liver lesion who is not clinically obstructed, can we perform a staging laparoscopy and then proceed with a laparoscopic anterior resection together with total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.