How is cervical cancer staged using the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cervical Cancer Staging Using the FIGO System

Cervical cancer is staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification system, which is fundamentally based on clinical gynecological examination but was revised in 2018 to incorporate radiologic imaging and pathologic findings—particularly lymph node status—to improve staging accuracy from 79% to over 90%. 1, 2

Core Staging Methodology

The FIGO staging system relies on a hierarchical approach to assessment:

  • Clinical examination remains the foundation, allowing worldwide standardization even in resource-limited settings 3, 2
  • Imaging findings (designated "r") are now formally incorporated, with MRI preferred over CT for tumor extension assessment 3
  • Pathological assessment (designated "p") takes precedence over radiological findings when both are available 1
  • The method used to assign stage must be documented and reported 4

Essential Staging Workup

Clinical Assessment

  • Gynecological examination to assess tumor size, vaginal extension, parametrial involvement, and potential bladder or rectal extension 2

Laboratory Tests

  • Complete blood count including platelets 3, 2
  • Renal function tests (critical, as hydronephrosis defines stage IIIB) 3, 2
  • Liver function tests 3, 2
  • Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen if squamous histology (useful for follow-up if initially elevated) 3, 2

Imaging Strategy

  • MRI of pelvis and abdomen is the preferred modality with 90.9% precision for tumor extension assessment 3, 1, 2
  • Imaging is mandatory for any clinically visible tumor or microscopic tumor with >5 mm invasion (stage IB or greater) 3, 2
  • Chest CT for metastasis assessment 3, 2
  • PET/CT shows high sensitivity for nodal disease and is increasingly important with the 2018 revision incorporating lymph node status 3, 2, 5

FIGO Stage Definitions

Stage 0

  • Carcinoma in situ (preinvasive carcinoma) 1

Stage I: Tumor Confined to Cervix

  • Stage IA (Microinvasive): Invasive carcinoma diagnosed only by microscopy with stromal invasion ≤5.0 mm depth and ≤7.0 mm horizontal spread 1, 4

    • IA1: ≤3 mm stromal invasion, ≤7 mm horizontal spread 2
    • IA2: >3 mm but ≤5 mm stromal invasion, ≤7 mm horizontal spread 2
  • Stage IB: Clinically visible lesion confined to cervix or microscopic lesion greater than IA2 1, 4

    • IB1: ≤2 cm (revised in 2018 from ≤4 cm) 4
    • IB2: >2 cm but ≤4 cm 4
    • IB3: >4 cm (new category added in 2018) 2, 4

Stage II: Tumor Invades Beyond Uterus

  • Stage IIA: Vaginal involvement (upper 2/3) without parametrial extension 1

    • IIA1: ≤4 cm 2
    • IIA2: >4 cm 2
  • Stage IIB: Parametrial extension 1, 2

Stage III: Extension to Pelvic Wall or Lower Vagina

  • Stage IIIA: Lower third of vagina involved 1
  • Stage IIIB: Pelvic wall extension and/or hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney 1
  • Stage IIIC (new in 2018): Lymph node involvement regardless of local tumor extent 1, 2, 4
    • IIIC1: Positive pelvic lymph nodes only 2, 4
    • IIIC2: Positive para-aortic lymph nodes 2, 4

Stage IV: Distant Spread

  • Stage IVA: Bladder or rectal mucosa invasion, or extension beyond true pelvis 1
  • Stage IVB: Distant metastasis (includes inguinal lymph nodes and intraperitoneal disease) 1

Critical Staging Principles

Important Caveats

  • Extension to the uterine corpus is disregarded for staging purposes; only vaginal and parametrial extension determine stage 1
  • Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) does not affect stage classification but is an important prognostic factor that must be documented 1, 2
  • Bullous edema alone is insufficient to classify as Stage IV; actual mucosal invasion must be present 1

Clinical Impact of Accurate Staging

The distinction between stages has direct treatment implications:

  • Tumors ≤4 cm without parametrial invasion (stages IA2-IIA1) are surgical candidates with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy 2
  • Tumors >4 cm or with parametrial/pelvic wall extension require primary chemoradiation 2
  • The 4 cm threshold is critical because it determines whether surgery or chemoradiation is the primary treatment modality 3, 2

2018 Revision Rationale

The incorporation of imaging and lymph node status addresses the limitation that clinical staging alone had only 79% accuracy, whereas the revised system achieves over 90% precision 1, 5. This change reflects common clinical practice, differentiates prognostic outcomes more accurately, and guides treatment stratification more effectively 5.

References

Guideline

Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.

Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti, 2019

Research

2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.