What causes a lung to fail to re‑expand after drainage of a massive pleural effusion, and what is the appropriate diagnostic and management approach?

Lung Entrapment Post-Drainage: Causes and Management

Direct Answer

When a lung fails to re-expand after drainage of a massive pleural effusion, the most common cause is a fibrous visceral pleural peel that mechanically prevents lung expansion—either "trapped lung" from remote inactive inflammation or "lung entrapment" from active malignancy or ongoing infection—and the appropriate management depends critically on distinguishing between these two entities before any intervention. 1, 2, 3

---

Causes of Failed Lung Re-Expansion

The lung may fail to re-expand after pleural drainage due to several distinct mechanisms:

Visceral Pleural Peel (Most Common)

• Trapped lung: A fibrous visceral pleural peel resulting from past, inactive pleural inflammation (e.g., inadequately treated parapneumonic effusion, prior cardiac surgery, chest trauma, or remote tuberculosis treatment) 1, 4
• Lung entrapment: A visceral pleural peel produced by active pleural disease—malignancy or ongoing infection/inflammation 1, 2, 3
• The mechanical restriction from the peel is the primary problem in trapped lung, whereas the underlying active disease is the primary problem in lung entrapment 3, 5

Other Mechanical Causes

• Mainstem bronchial obstruction by tumor causing lobar collapse 6, 3
• Pleural loculations preventing complete drainage 6
• Persistent air leak 6
• Chronic atelectasis from other causes 3

---

Diagnostic Approach: Identifying the Cause

Initial Clinical Clues

Key radiographic finding: Absence of contralateral mediastinal shift despite a large effusion volume strongly suggests trapped lung or lung entrapment 6, 1

Pleural Manometry (Critical Diagnostic Tool)

Perform pleural manometry during initial thoracentesis to identify unexpandable lung:

• Initial pleural pressure < 10 cm H₂O at the start of thoracentesis makes trapped lung highly likely 6, 1
• Cut points predictive of trapped lung (in the absence of endobronchial obstruction): pleural pressure > 19 cm H₂O after removing 500 mL, or > 20 cm H₂O after removing 1 L 6
• Abnormal (incomplete) lung expansion during drainage on manometry supports the diagnosis 1, 2

Post-Drainage Findings

• Post-thoracentesis hydropneumothorax: Classic presentation of unexpandable lung 2, 3, 5
• Inability to completely drain effusion due to chest pain: Another typical manifestation 2, 3, 5

Distinguishing Trapped Lung from Lung Entrapment

This distinction is critical because management differs fundamentally:

Trapped lung (benign, inactive):

• Chronic, stable pleural effusion without evidence of active pleural disease 2, 4
• Requires documentation of chronicity and stability 4
• Absence of malignancy or active inflammation on pleural fluid analysis and imaging 4
• Often asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic 4, 5

Lung entrapment (active disease):

• Active malignant pleural effusion or ongoing pleural infection 1, 2, 3
• Pleural fluid analysis shows malignant cells or inflammatory markers 3
• Imaging demonstrates active pleural disease 2

Additional Diagnostic Studies

• Bronchoscopy: To exclude endobronchial obstruction if suspected 6
• Thoracoscopy: Can directly visualize visceral pleural peel and differentiate trapped lung from lung entrapment 6
• Imaging (CT chest): Demonstrates visceral pleural thickening characteristic of both trapped lung and lung entrapment 2

---

Management Algorithm

Step 1: Confirm Complete vs. Incomplete Lung Expansion

Before any therapeutic intervention, verify:

1. Radiographic lung expansion status 1
2. Presence or absence of contralateral mediastinal shift 1
3. Initial pleural pressure during thoracentesis 1

Step 2: If Trapped Lung is Diagnosed

First-line treatment: Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) 1

• IPCs are recommended by the European Respiratory Society and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery as primary treatment 1
• Achieves symptomatic improvement in >94% of patients 1
• Associated with shorter hospital stays and reduced morbidity compared to alternatives 1
• Catheters can remain in situ until death in most patients 1
• Rare serious complications include empyema and catheter fracture 1

Alternative for select patients: Video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication

• May be considered for younger, high-performance-status patients with benign trapped lung 1
• This is the only definitive treatment but requires careful patient selection 4, 5
• Should only be considered after excluding other causes of dyspnea 5

Contraindicated interventions:

• Pleurodesis is contraindicated and will fail because the visceral and parietal pleura cannot appose 1
• Pleuroperitoneal shunts are no longer recommended due to high complication rates 1

Step 3: If Lung Entrapment (Active Disease) is Diagnosed

Management depends on the underlying active process:

For malignant lung entrapment:

• Indwelling pleural catheter is also the preferred approach 1
• Pleurodesis may still be attempted in cases of partial lung re-expansion if the patient is unsuitable for surgery, as symptomatic relief was reported in 9 out of 10 patients in one study (though this is lower-quality evidence) 6, 1
• The British Thoracic Society states that even with incomplete pleural apposition, chemical pleurodesis should still be attempted and may provide symptomatic relief 6

For inflammatory lung entrapment (infection):

• Treat the underlying infection aggressively 3, 5
• Consider early surgical decortication if medical management fails 3

Step 4: If Endobronchial Obstruction is Found

• Address the bronchial obstruction (e.g., stenting, debulking, radiation) 6
• Re-assess lung expansion after relieving obstruction 6

---

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Attempting Pleurodesis Without Confirming Complete Lung Expansion

• This is the most common and costly error 1
• Always assess for complete lung expansion before pleurodesis by checking: (1) absence of contralateral mediastinal shift on imaging, and (2) initial pleural pressure < 10 cm H₂O during drainage 6, 1
• Failure to recognize trapped lung before attempting pleurodesis leads to procedural failure, unnecessary patient suffering, and wasted resources 1

Rapid or Excessive Drainage Causing Re-Expansion Pulmonary Edema (RPE)

• Limit drainage to ≤1–1.5 L per session 6, 7, 1
• Slow drainage to approximately 500 mL/hour if continuing beyond 1.5 L 6, 7
• Stop immediately if the patient develops chest discomfort, persistent cough, or vasovagal symptoms, regardless of volume drained 6, 7
• If pleural pressure monitoring is available, stop drainage if end-expiratory pleural pressure falls below -20 cm H₂O 7
• RPE results from hypoxic injury to the collapsed lung, not just mechanical stress, and can occur even with modest volumes if drainage is rapid 8

Applying Excessive Suction

• Suction is usually unnecessary for drainage before and after pleurodesis 6
• If suction is required (e.g., for persistent air leak), use high-volume, low-pressure systems with gradual increment to approximately -20 cm H₂O maximum 6, 7
• Early and excessive pleural suction increases RPO risk 6

Delaying Intervention Based on Drainage Volume Alone

• Do not postpone therapeutic intervention until pleural fluid output falls below 150 mL/day 6, 1
• Radiographic confirmation of lung expansion should guide timing instead 6, 1
• Once effusion drainage and lung re-expansion are radiographically confirmed, pleurodesis should not be delayed while awaiting cessation of pleural fluid drainage 6