In a 14‑week pregnant gravida 2 para 1 woman with a prior low‑segment transverse cesarean delivery 8 years ago for fetal distress/abruption at 7 months, a second‑trimester complete abortion at 17 weeks two months ago, and 8 years of secondary infertility, is a prophylactic cervical cerclage indicated?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cervical Cerclage is NOT Indicated in This Case

Based on current evidence, prophylactic cervical cerclage is not indicated for this patient at 14 weeks gestation. Her obstetric history does not meet the established criteria for either history-indicated or ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Why Cerclage is Not Indicated

History Does Not Meet Criteria for History-Indicated Cerclage

  • History-indicated cerclage requires a history of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to cervical insufficiency, typically defined as painless cervical dilation in the second trimester 1
  • This patient's prior pregnancy losses do not fit the classic pattern:
    • Her first delivery at 7 months (28 weeks) was via cesarean for fetal distress and placental abruption—these are acute obstetric emergencies, not cervical insufficiency 2
    • Placental abruption is an acute placental separation event that necessitates immediate delivery and is unrelated to cervical competence 2
    • Her recent loss at 17 weeks was a complete abortion, which could represent various etiologies but occurred only once and does not establish a pattern of recurrent second-trimester losses due to cervical insufficiency 1

No Evidence for Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage at This Time

  • Ultrasound-indicated cerclage is considered when transvaginal cervical length is ≤25 mm before 24 weeks in women with prior sPTB 1
  • This patient should receive 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) 250 mg intramuscularly weekly starting at 16-20 weeks until 36 weeks given her history of prior preterm delivery, regardless of the indication 1
  • Serial transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening should be performed every 2 weeks from 16-23 6/7 weeks in patients with prior sPTB receiving 17P 1
  • If cervical length shortens to <25 mm on serial monitoring, cerclage may be considered at that time, particularly if the cervix measures <15 mm 1, 3

Recommended Management Algorithm

Immediate Actions (14 Weeks)

  • Initiate 17P 250 mg intramuscularly weekly starting now (between 16-20 weeks is optimal timing) and continue until 36 weeks 1
  • Begin serial transvaginal cervical length measurements every 2 weeks starting at 16 weeks through 23 6/7 weeks 1
  • Provide folic acid supplementation and nutritional counseling 1

Ongoing Surveillance Protocol

  • If cervical length remains >25 mm: Continue 17P and routine obstetric care 1
  • If cervical length measures 15-25 mm: Consider cerclage placement with shared decision-making; continue 17P regardless of cerclage decision 1, 3
  • If cervical length <15 mm: Strongly consider cerclage placement as this represents significant shortening; physical exam should be performed to assess for cervical dilation, as 30-70% may already have dilation ≥1 cm at this length 3

Critical Monitoring Points

  • Weekly outpatient visits once cervical shortening is detected to assess for signs of preterm labor or infection 4
  • Patient should monitor daily for vaginal bleeding, discharge changes, contractions, or pelvic pressure 4
  • If cerclage is placed, continue vaginal progesterone 400 mg daily in addition to 17P, as this combination reduces preterm birth <34 weeks (2.2% vs 18.4%) 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not place prophylactic cerclage based solely on one prior preterm delivery when that delivery was indicated for acute complications (abruption/fetal distress) rather than cervical insufficiency 1
  • Do not confuse a complete abortion at 17 weeks with recurrent second-trimester losses due to cervical insufficiency—a single event does not establish the pattern required for history-indicated cerclage 1
  • Do not skip 17P administration in favor of waiting for cervical length assessment—17P should be started regardless and is the first-line intervention for prior sPTB 1
  • Avoid placing cerclage after 24 weeks unless it meets criteria for emergency cerclage with visible membranes and cervical dilation 3

Special Consideration: Prior Cesarean Section

  • The patient's prior low-segment transverse cesarean delivery does not contraindicate future cerclage placement if it becomes indicated based on cervical length findings 5
  • Her uterine scar does not increase risk for cerclage-related complications 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Placental abruption.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 2006

Guideline

Management of Progressive Cervical Shortening Despite Progesterone

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

In a 14‑week pregnant woman with one prior cesarean delivery, a remote pregnancy loss at 28 weeks due to fetal distress and abruptio placentae, 8 years of secondary infertility, and a complete abortion at 17 weeks two months ago, is cervical cerclage indicated?
What are the indications for a Cesarean (C-Section) delivery?
What is the best course of action for a 38-week pregnant patient with placental abruption, severe vaginal bleeding, tachycardia (heart rate 100), hypotension (blood pressure 80/90), uterine tenderness, and a cervical dilation of 4 cm with the fetal head engaged?
What is the management for a 29-year-old woman, gravida (number of times pregnant) 1, para (number of viable births) 0, at 33 weeks gestation with known vasa previa, who experienced rupture of membranes with blood-tinged fluid, no contractions, and no heavy vaginal bleeding, with a fetal heart rate of bradycardia?
What is the most correct statement regarding counseling for a trial of labor after caesarean section (TOLAC) in a patient with a previous cesarean section (CS) for breech presentation?
How should atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome be treated?
Is a prophylactic McDonald cervical cerclage indicated now (at 14 weeks gestation) for a 14‑week pregnant woman with one prior cesarean section for fetal distress and abruptio placentae at 28 weeks 8 years ago, secondary infertility for 8 years, and a complete second‑trimester abortion at 17 weeks two months ago?
Is cervical cerclage indicated now for a 14‑week pregnant woman (gravida 2, para 1) who had a low‑transverse cesarean 8 years ago for fetal distress due to placental abruption at 7 months, has a history of cervical insufficiency with a complete abortion at 17 weeks two months ago, and eight‑year infertility, with no other medical or surgical problems?
In a 14‑week pregnant woman with one prior cesarean delivery, a remote pregnancy loss at 28 weeks due to fetal distress and abruptio placentae, 8 years of secondary infertility, and a complete abortion at 17 weeks two months ago, is cervical cerclage indicated?
In a 14‑week pregnant woman (G2P1) with 8 years of secondary infertility, a prior complete second‑trimester loss at 17 weeks two months ago, and one previous low‑segment cesarean delivery, and no other medical or family history, is cervical cerclage indicated?
What is the immediate assessment and treatment protocol for an adult presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.