What ultrasound findings are indicative of head‑and‑neck lymphoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound Findings Pertinent to Head and Neck Lymphoma

Lymphoma nodes characteristically appear as round, hypoechoic, homogeneous masses with absent fatty hilum, often showing multiple confluent lobulated patterns and minimal internal vascularity on ultrasound. 1, 2, 3

Key Sonographic Features of Lymphomatous Nodes

Shape and Size Characteristics

  • Round morphology with short-to-long axis ratio >0.5 is highly suspicious, as virtually all longitudinal nodes are benign while 80% of round nodes demonstrate malignancy 1
  • Nodes exceeding 20 mm in axial diameter, particularly when round or oval-shaped, are strongly associated with malignancy 1
  • Multiple nodes often appear as confluent lobulated masses rather than discrete nodules 2

Internal Architecture

  • Homogeneous hypoechoic echotexture is the hallmark finding, appearing darker than adjacent muscle tissue 2, 3, 4
  • Complete absence of echogenic fatty hilum is critical—the hilus is a linear echogenic structure continuous with perinodal fat that disappears in malignant infiltration 3, 4
  • Lymphoma nodes typically lack the punctate bright echogenic spots seen in 78% of metastatic carcinoma nodes, helping differentiate these entities 3
  • Homogeneous internal echo pattern without cystic necrosis distinguishes lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma metastases (which show cystic changes in 19% of cases) 3

Border and Margin Features

  • Sharp, well-defined borders are typical, contrasting with the ragged, irregular borders of some metastatic nodes 4
  • Loss of normal fascial planes and adjacent soft tissue edema may occur in aggressive cases 4
  • Matted nodes (clumped together without intervening soft tissue) suggest extensive disease 4

Vascular Patterns

  • Minimal or absent intranodal vascularity on Doppler is characteristic of lymphoma, contrasting with the increased peripheral and hilar vascularity of reactive nodes 5
  • Venous invasion can occur, demonstrated as loss of echogenicity in vessel walls, particularly in the internal jugular vein 2
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound shows reduced parenchymal perfusion compared to reactive nodes 5

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls

Size Thresholds

  • While nodes <10 mm in short axis are generally benign, lymphoma can present with nodes ≤15 mm that appear reactive 6
  • Do not rely solely on size criteria—internal architecture is more specific 1, 3

Distinguishing from Other Pathology

  • Tuberculosis lymphadenitis may mimic lymphoma with hypoechoic appearance but often shows cystic necrosis and calcification 2, 4
  • Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma shows punctate bright echogenic spots (78% of cases) and cystic necrosis (19%), features absent in lymphoma 3
  • Reactive nodes maintain oval shape, preserved fatty hilum, and increased hilar vascularity 5, 3

Tissue Confirmation Requirements

Core needle biopsy is mandatory for definitive diagnosis, as ultrasound alone cannot reliably distinguish lymphoma from other pathologies 7, 8

  • Core biopsy provides superior diagnostic accuracy (88% sensitivity) compared to fine needle aspiration (74% sensitivity) and yields tissue for immunohistochemistry essential for lymphoma subtyping 6
  • Ultrasound-guided FNA is acceptable when anticoagulation cannot be discontinued, with 52-79% sensitivity when combined with ultrasound guidance 6
  • Never rely solely on imaging to exclude malignancy when clinical suspicion exists, as physical examination findings of hard, fixed nodes override reassuring ultrasound features 8

Red Flags Requiring Immediate Biopsy

  • Progressive enlargement to >15 mm in short axis on serial imaging 6
  • Development of irregular borders, necrosis, or extranodal extension 6
  • Loss of fatty hilum on follow-up imaging (90-93% positive predictive value for malignancy) 6
  • Cortical thickness >3 mm 6
  • Hard, fixed consistency on palpation regardless of ultrasound appearance 8

References

Research

Ultrasonic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, 1990

Research

Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2014

Guideline

Management of Reactive Cervical Lymph Nodes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Hard Fixed Lymph Nodes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the appropriate management for a patient with a 2cm cervical lymph node having a thick hypoechoic cortex?
What specialist should a 24-year-old female with large left cervical and submandibular lymph nodes showing echogenic hila be referred to?
What is the appropriate management for a patient with bilateral enlarged cervical lymph nodes, left-sided tenderness, and ultrasound findings of increased fatty hila and cortical thickening?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management of cervical lymphadenopathy?
What is the next step in management for a 21-year-old female with a hypoechoic area in the neck, measuring 2.8 x 1.9 x 0.5 cm, on ultrasound, with no mass found on computed tomography (CT) soft tissue neck and shotty bilateral cervical lymph nodes?
In a 70‑kg adult with hypernatremia who needs a 10 mmol/L reduction in serum sodium, how much 5% dextrose in water (D5W) should be given?
Can a 20‑year‑old woman with severe vitamin‑D deficiency (25‑OH‑D ≈7 ng/mL) be treated safely with weekly oral cholecalciferol (vitamin D₃) and daily calcium carbonate supplementation?
Should propranolol and verapamil be used concurrently or intermittently, and what dosing, monitoring, and safety precautions are recommended?
What is the maximum percentage of the external anal sphincter that can be safely divided during a fistulotomy?
What is the recommended oral pyrantel pamoate dose for children aged 2 years and older, including weight‑based calculation, maximum dose, and repeat dosing interval?
Is systemic muscle atrophy a distinct disease entity?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.