What is the recommended evaluation and management of a supracondylar humerus fracture in a child (age 5‑10)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures (Ages 5-10)

For displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children, closed reduction with percutaneous pinning is the definitive treatment, while nondisplaced fractures should be immobilized with a posterior splint. 1, 2, 3

Initial Evaluation

Immediate Neurovascular Assessment

  • Perform thorough neurovascular examination at presentation, assessing for absent pulses, cold/pale hand, and nerve function—this is critical as vascular compromise can lead to limb loss. 2
  • Nerve injuries occur in approximately 10% of supracondylar fractures, though most are neurapraxias that resolve with conservative management. 2, 4
  • Document the presence or absence of radial pulse, hand perfusion (color, temperature, capillary refill), and motor/sensory function of radial, median, and ulnar nerves. 4

Radiographic Evaluation

  • Obtain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow to assess fracture displacement and pattern. 2
  • Use the Gartland classification system to guide treatment decisions (Type I: nondisplaced, Type II: displaced with intact posterior cortex, Type III: completely displaced). 5, 6

Treatment Algorithm by Fracture Type

Gartland Type I (Nondisplaced)

  • Immobilize with a posterior splint rather than collar-and-cuff, as it provides superior pain control within the first 2 weeks after injury. 2
  • Obtain radiographic follow-up during the first 3 weeks and at cessation of immobilization to confirm the fracture remains nondisplaced. 7
  • Immobilization duration is typically 3-4 weeks, though optimal timing lacks high-quality evidence. 2

Gartland Type II and III (Displaced)

  • Perform closed reduction with percutaneous pinning as the preferred treatment, which demonstrates superior outcomes compared to closed reduction and casting alone. 2, 3
  • This approach has a number needed to treat of 20 for preventing cubitus varus and 7 for achieving excellent outcomes by Flynn's criteria. 2
  • Use either two to three lateral pins or a crossed pin configuration (one lateral, one medial)—both yield successful outcomes when performed with proper technique. 3, 5
  • Surgery can be safely delayed 12-18 hours after injury if neurovascular status permits, though no definitive time threshold exists. 1, 5

Open Reduction Indications

  • Consider open reduction when closed reduction fails to achieve adequate alignment, though this may result in greater stiffness compared to closed methods. 1, 2
  • Open reduction shows lower loss of reduction rates but higher stiffness rates compared to successful closed reduction. 1, 2

Management of Vascular Compromise

Absent Pulse with Poor Perfusion (Cold, Pale Hand)

  • Perform emergent closed reduction immediately—this is a limb-threatening emergency. 1, 4
  • If perfusion does not improve after reduction and pinning, perform immediate open exploration of the antecubital fossa. 1, 2
  • The catastrophic risks of persistent inadequate perfusion include limb loss, ischemic muscle contracture, nerve injury, and functional deficit. 1, 2
  • Obtain vascular surgery consultation for management of arterial injuries. 2

Absent Pulse with Adequate Perfusion (Pink, Warm Hand)

  • The AAOS guidelines cannot definitively recommend for or against exploration in this scenario. 1
  • Minimal management requires careful monitoring for 48 hours for loss of perfusion or development of compartment syndrome. 4
  • According to the 2016 AAOS appropriateness criteria, treatment decisions should be individualized based on vascular status and perfusion patterns. 1

Critical Pitfall

  • Never delay vascular exploration when the hand remains pale and pulseless after reduction—this risks limb loss. 2
  • Nerve palsy accompanying pulselessness warrants immediate exploration, as this suggests more severe vascular injury. 4

Postoperative Management

Pin Removal and Mobilization

  • Remove pins at approximately 3-4 weeks, though optimal timing lacks high-quality evidence. 1, 2
  • Begin early active motion after pin removal to prevent elbow stiffness—this is critical for functional recovery. 2
  • The AAOS guidelines cannot recommend for or against routine supervised physical or occupational therapy, as no studies addressed this question. 1

Expected Outcomes

  • When properly treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, expect excellent outcomes in approximately 90% of patients by Flynn's criteria. 3, 6
  • The most common long-term complication is cubitus varus deformity, with incidence ranging from 3-57% historically, though adequate reduction and pinning has dramatically decreased this rate. 8
  • Pin tract infections occur in approximately 10-30% of cases but are typically minor and resolve with local care. 3

Special Considerations for Ages 5-10

  • This age group represents the peak incidence for supracondylar fractures, accounting for approximately 60% of all pediatric elbow fractures. 3, 8
  • The mechanism is typically a fall on an outstretched hand with the elbow in extension (extension-type fracture in 90-95% of cases). 6
  • Boys have higher incidence than girls in this age range. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Management of supracondylar humerus fractures in children: current concepts.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012

Research

Treatment approaches and outcomes in childhood supracondylar humerus fractures.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2012

Guideline

Management of Non-Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Children

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.