What are the recommended glucose target ranges for an adult with type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Target Glucose Ranges for Type 2 Diabetes with CGM

For adults with type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring, maintain glucose between 70-180 mg/dL for more than 70% of the time, with less than 4% of time below 70 mg/dL and less than 25% of time above 180 mg/dL. 1, 2

Primary Target Metrics

Your CGM should show the following ranges over at least 14 consecutive days with ≥70% active sensor time 1, 2:

Time in Range (TIR): 70-180 mg/dL

  • Target: >70% of readings (approximately 17 hours per day) 3, 1, 2
  • Each 5% increase in TIR provides measurable reductions in microvascular complications like retinopathy and nephropathy 2
  • This is the single most important metric correlating with long-term diabetes complications 3

Time Below Range (Hypoglycemia Prevention)

  • Level 1 (54-69 mg/dL): <4% of time (less than 1 hour per day) 1, 2
  • Level 2 (<54 mg/dL): <1% of time (less than 15 minutes per day) 1, 2
  • This is your safety-first priority—hypoglycemia prevention takes precedence over achieving tight glucose control 2

Time Above Range (Hyperglycemia Limits)

  • Level 1 (181-250 mg/dL): <25% of time (less than 6 hours per day) 1, 2
  • Level 2 (>250 mg/dL): <5% of time (less than 1 hour 12 minutes per day) 2
  • Minimizing time above 250 mg/dL reduces risk of acute complications and long-term cardiovascular disease 1

Glucose Variability

  • Coefficient of variation (CV): ≤36% 3, 1, 2
  • If you take insulin or sulfonylureas, aim for CV <33% for additional hypoglycemia protection 3, 1
  • Lower variability means more stable, predictable glucose patterns 1

Modified Targets for Special Circumstances

Older Adults or High-Risk Patients

If you have a history of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, limited life expectancy (<10 years), advanced complications, or significant frailty 2, 4:

  • TIR: >50% (at least 12 hours per day in 70-180 mg/dL) 1, 2
  • Combined TBR: <1% (less than 15 minutes per day below 70 mg/dL) 1, 2
  • TAR >250 mg/dL: <10% (less than 2 hours 24 minutes per day) 1
  • These relaxed targets prioritize safety over tight control 2, 4

Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

If you have advanced CKD or are on hemodialysis 2:

  • TIR: >50% (more conservative due to impaired kidney gluconeogenesis and decreased insulin clearance) 2
  • TBR: <1% (stricter hypoglycemia prevention given increased risk) 2
  • Use Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) instead of HbA1c when they don't match, as HbA1c becomes unreliable in kidney disease 2

Practical Implementation Algorithm

Follow this sequence when reviewing your CGM data 2:

  1. First: Verify hypoglycemia safety—Confirm TBR <54 mg/dL is <1% and TBR 54-69 mg/dL is <4% 2

    • If TBR exceeds these targets, do not intensify therapy; instead reduce insulin doses or adjust timing 4
  2. Second: Check efficacy—Verify TIR 70-180 mg/dL is >70% (or >50% if high-risk) 2

    • If TIR is below target and TBR is acceptable, consider intensifying glucose-lowering therapy 4
  3. Third: Assess variability—Confirm CV is ≤36% 2

    • High variability suggests erratic eating patterns, medication timing issues, or need for automated insulin delivery 1
  4. Fourth: Address hyperglycemia—Check TAR >250 mg/dL is <5% and TAR 181-250 mg/dL is <25% 2

    • If TAR is the predominant issue, intensify therapy by adjusting insulin, adding/optimizing medications, or considering GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors 4, 5

Data Collection Requirements

Before making any treatment decisions based on CGM 1, 2:

  • Minimum 14 consecutive days of sensor wear 1, 2
  • At least 70% active sensor time (approximately 10 days of usable data) 1, 2
  • Review the complete Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) report showing all 10 standardized metrics 1, 4
  • For assessing hypoglycemia patterns specifically, collect 28-35 days of data 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Don't focus only on average glucose or GMI—you can have a normal average but still experience dangerous highs and lows that the average conceals 1. A patient with 50% time at 250 mg/dL and 50% time at 70 mg/dL would show an acceptable average of 160 mg/dL but terrible glucose control 1.

Don't make medication changes without reviewing the complete AGP—the visual display reveals patterns (dawn phenomenon, post-meal spikes, overnight lows) that raw percentages miss 4.

Don't assume low TBR percentages mean no hypoglycemia risk—even individuals with <4% TBR can experience substantial numbers of severe hypoglycemic events, so monitor frequency separately 2.

Don't use the same targets for everyone—older adults, those with kidney disease, and patients with hypoglycemia unawareness require more conservative goals to prevent dangerous lows 2, 4.

Corresponding HbA1c Target

The CGM-derived Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) should be <7% (approximately 53 mmol/mol), which corresponds to a mean glucose of approximately 154 mg/dL 3, 4. However, CGM metrics provide more actionable information than HbA1c alone because they reveal the timing and patterns of glucose excursions 6.

References

Guideline

Ideal CGM Data Set for Blood Sugar Monitoring

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Target Blood Glucose Levels for Adults with Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management Targets and Intensification for Adults with Diabetes Based on CGM Metrics

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The Changing Landscape of Glycemic Targets: Focus on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2020

Related Questions

What is the general approach to medication management for a patient with type 2 diabetes, including dosing and monitoring?
What is the best course of action for an outpatient who is on the maximum dose of Monjaro (tirzepatide) and refuses to use a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), having previously been on insulin (Humulin) which was discontinued due to a rash after doubling the dose, and has been advised to schedule an appointment with her endocrinologist?
What are the key recommendations in the ADA (American Diabetes Association) 2025 guidelines for managing type 2 diabetes?
Can oral medications be continued in a patient with type 2 diabetes?
In a 45-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and a smoking history presenting with three days of fever, productive yellow sputum, and a right lower lobe infiltrate on chest radiograph, what is the most appropriate management?
Does high-dose ondansetron use in early pregnancy increase the risk of congenital cardiac malformations?
A patient inadvertently took an additional morning dose of levothyroxine 100 µg, clozapine 25 mg, valproate 500 mg, hydromorphone 4 mg, furosemide 20 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg on top of her regular evening regimen of lithium 900 mg, pregabalin 25 mg, lorazepam 1 mg, and hydromorphone 2 mg. What are the clinically significant drug‑drug interactions, what immediate management steps should be taken, which parameters need to be monitored and for how long, and what are the half‑lives and elimination times of each medication?
What is resveratrol and is it useful for disease prevention or treatment in generally healthy adults?
How should I counsel a 69-year-old Black male who is experiencing weight gain while taking venlafaxine?
What is the appropriate interval between repeat chest radiographs for different clinical scenarios?
In a patient with head trauma, does the presence of vasogenic edema and new hyperdense lesions on imaging suggest acute intracranial hemorrhage?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.