What is the prognosis for laryngeal (voice box) cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 24, 2025 • View editorial policy

From the Guidelines

Laryngeal cancer prognosis is significantly improved with early detection and treatment, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 70-90% for early-stage disease confined to the larynx. The prognosis for laryngeal cancer varies depending on several factors, including the stage of the disease, with overall 5-year survival rates approximately 60-65% 1. For early-stage laryngeal cancer (Stage I or II), survival rates are much better, ranging from 70-90%, whereas for advanced disease with distant metastasis (Stage IV), survival rates decrease to 30-40% 2. Other factors affecting prognosis include the specific location within the larynx, patient's overall health status, age, smoking history, and response to treatment.

Key Factors Affecting Prognosis

  • Stage of the disease at diagnosis
  • Location of the cancer within the larynx (glottic, supraglottic, or subglottic)
  • Patient's overall health status and age
  • Smoking history and continued smoking after diagnosis
  • Response to treatment, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or combinations of these ### Treatment Approaches Treatment approaches for laryngeal cancer typically include:
  • Surgery
  • Radiation therapy
  • Chemotherapy
  • Combinations of these, with voice preservation being an important consideration when possible 1 ### Importance of Early Detection and Treatment Early detection and treatment are crucial for improving prognosis in laryngeal cancer, with regular follow-up care essential after treatment to monitor for recurrence, which is highest in the first 2-3 years 2.

Recommendations for Improvement

Smoking cessation is strongly recommended to improve prognosis, as patients who continue smoking after diagnosis have significantly worse outcomes 1, 2.

From the Research

Laryngeal Cancer Prognosis

  • The 5-year survival rate for laryngeal cancer patients has decreased from 66% to 63% in recent years, which may be due to changes in treatment approaches 3.
  • Patients with advanced tumors (stages III and IV) have a higher risk of death compared to those with initial tumor stages (I and II), with a hazard ratio of 2.89 for cause-specific survival and 2.01 for overall survival 3.
  • Surgical treatment is associated with a higher chance of survival compared to organ preservation protocols based on chemoradiotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.62 for cause-specific survival, 0.74 for overall survival, and 0.61 for disease-free survival 3.

Treatment Modalities

  • Concomitant radiotherapy and superselective arterial infusion of cisplatin has shown excellent therapeutic outcomes for laryngeal cancer, especially in locally advanced cases 4.
  • Laryngectomy provides better survival outcomes than chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage 4 laryngeal cancer, with a significant difference in disease-specific survival and overall survival 5.
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy following laryngectomy improves survival outcomes, with double the disease-specific survival and triple the overall survival compared to laryngectomy alone 5.

Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy

  • Induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and cetuximab is a potential treatment option for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, with comparable efficacy to docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil but less toxicity 6.
  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy is the standard of care for laryngeal cancers, with recommendations for early stage tumors to be treated with either radiotherapy or conservative surgery, and organ preservation strategies for more advanced tumors 7.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.