Treatment Guidelines for Valve Replacement
Prosthetic Valve Selection by Age
For aortic valve replacement, choose a bioprosthesis in patients >65 years and a mechanical valve in patients <60 years; for mitral valve replacement, these age cutoffs shift to >70 years and <65 years respectively. 1
Age-Based Algorithm
Patients <50 years (aortic) or <60 years (mitral): Mechanical valve is strongly recommended unless contraindications to anticoagulation exist 1
Patients 60-65 years (aortic) or 65-70 years (mitral): Either valve type is acceptable; decision requires careful integration of multiple factors beyond age alone 1
- Research shows event-free life expectancy may actually favor bioprosthesis even at age 60, with lower lifetime bleeding risk (12% vs 41%) despite higher reoperation risk (25% vs 3%) 2
- Recent data demonstrates similar long-term mortality and morbidity between valve types in the 50-70 age range, with reoperation differences only emerging at 15 years (21.2% bioprosthetic vs 9.7% mechanical) 3
Patients >65 years (aortic) or >70 years (mitral): Bioprosthesis should be considered, particularly when life expectancy is lower than the presumed durability of the bioprosthesis 1
Mandatory Indications for Bioprosthetic Valves (Class I Recommendations)
A bioprosthesis is required when good-quality anticoagulation is unlikely or contraindicated due to high bleeding risk. 1
Patient preference: Bioprosthesis is recommended according to the desire of the informed patient 1
Anticoagulation contraindications or impracticality:
Mechanical valve thrombosis: Bioprosthesis is recommended for reoperation when thrombosis occurred despite good long-term anticoagulant control 1
Additional Considerations Favoring Bioprosthetic Valves (Class IIa)
Young women contemplating pregnancy: Bioprosthesis should be considered to avoid the high thromboembolic risk of mechanical valves during pregnancy 1
Low-risk redo surgery candidates: Bioprosthesis should be considered when there is low likelihood and/or low operative risk of future redo valve surgery 1
Mandatory Indications for Mechanical Valves (Class I Recommendations)
Patient preference: Mechanical prosthesis is recommended according to the desire of the informed patient when no contraindications to long-term anticoagulation exist 1
Risk of accelerated structural valve deterioration: Mechanical valve is required in patients at high risk (young age <40 years, hyperparathyroidism) 1
Existing mechanical valve: Mechanical prosthesis is recommended in patients already anticoagulated due to a mechanical prosthesis in another valve position 1
Additional Considerations Favoring Mechanical Valves (Class IIa)
High-risk redo surgery candidates: Mechanical prosthesis should be considered in patients with reasonable life expectancy (>10 years) for whom future redo valve surgery would be at high risk 1
Existing anticoagulation requirement: Mechanical valve may be considered in patients already on long-term anticoagulation due to high thromboembolism risk (atrial fibrillation, previous thromboembolism, hypercoagulable state, severe LV systolic dysfunction) 1
Surgical Versus Transcatheter Approach
The provided guidelines focus primarily on prosthetic valve selection rather than surgical versus transcatheter approach selection. However, key principles include:
Baseline echocardiography: Should be performed within 30 days after valve implantation (preferably at 30 days for surgery) for both transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic valves, then at 1 year and annually thereafter 1
Transcatheter mitral valve repair eligibility (from Praxis): Candidates must have severe chronic primary mitral regurgitation with NYHA III-IV symptoms, LVEF 20-50%, LV end-systolic dimension ≤70 mm, pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≤70 mmHg, and adequate valve morphology on TEE 4
Postoperative Anticoagulation Management
For Mechanical Valves
All patients with mechanical valves require lifelong anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). 5
- Low-dose aspirin is recommended indefinitely in addition to VKA therapy for mechanical prosthetic valves (ACC/AHA guideline, Class I) 1
- The ESC guidelines do not recommend routine aspirin use but suggest it after thromboembolic events despite adequate INR (Class IIa) or with concomitant coronary artery disease (Class IIb) 1
For Bioprosthetic Valves
Anticoagulation with VKA is recommended for the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement or mitral valve repair. 1, 5
- Low-dose aspirin is now favored as an alternative to postoperative anticoagulant therapy for surgical aortic bioprostheses, though this relies on low-level evidence 1
- ACC/AHA guidelines recommend indefinite aspirin use for left-sided bioprosthetic valves (Class IIa) 1
- ESC guidelines suggest considering VKA for the first 3 months after surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement (Class IIa for mitral, Class IIb for aortic) 1
- For transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), dual antiplatelet therapy for 3-6 months followed by aspirin indefinitely is recommended by ESC (Class IIa); ACC/AHA suggests clopidogrel for 6 months (Class IIb) 1
Bridging Anticoagulation
A critical divergence exists between ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines regarding bridging therapy:
- ESC 2017: Routinely recommends bridging with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin when VKA therapy must be interrupted (Class I) 1
- ACC/AHA 2014/2017: Does NOT recommend bridging for bileaflet or newer-generation tilting-disc mechanical valves in aortic position (Class I); recommends individualized approach for others (Class IIa) 1
The ACC/AHA approach is supported by stronger evidence showing 4-fold higher bleeding risk with bridging without reduction in thromboembolic events. 1
Lifelong Follow-Up Requirements
- Clinical assessment: Yearly or immediately if new cardiac symptoms occur 1
- Echocardiography: At baseline (within 30 days), at 1 year, then annually for bioprosthetic valves 1
- First postoperative visit: Within 6-12 weeks to assess wound healing, symptomatic status, heart rhythm, chest X-ray, echocardiography, and blood tests including hemolysis markers 5
- All patients require lifelong follow-up by a cardiologist to detect early prosthetic dysfunction or progressive disease of other valves 1, 5
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Valve thrombosis can occur with ANY prosthetic valve type, including bioprostheses, especially in low cardiac output states 5
- Thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related bleeding represent the majority of complications in prosthetic valve recipients 1
- The shift toward bioprosthetic valves in younger patients may prove harmful as more long-term data become available, particularly regarding valve-in-valve procedures 6
- For patients aged 50-70 with life expectancy >20 years, reintervention will likely be required regardless of valve type chosen 6