What absorbable suture material and size is recommended for facial skin closure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Absorbable Sutures for Facial Skin Closure

Primary Recommendation

For facial skin closure, use 5-0 rapidly absorbable coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) or 5-0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) with a continuous subcuticular technique. 1

Optimal Suture Material Selection

  • Rapidly absorbable synthetic monofilament sutures (5-0 size) are the preferred choice for facial skin closure because they eliminate the need for suture removal, reduce patient anxiety and discomfort, and produce equivalent cosmetic outcomes to non-absorbable sutures at 6 months. 1

  • Specifically, 5-0 coated irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) has been directly compared to non-absorbable 5-0 polypropylene in facial wound closure and demonstrated no difference in scar formation or wound complications. 1

  • Alternative option: 5-0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) is equally acceptable and retains 50-75% tensile strength after 1 week, providing adequate wound support during the critical healing period. 2, 1

Deep Layer Closure

  • For deeper tissue layers in facial wounds, use 4-0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) with buried dermal sutures before closing the skin surface. 1

  • This layered approach reduces tension on the skin closure and improves cosmetic outcomes. 1

Suture Technique

  • Employ continuous subcuticular suture technique rather than interrupted sutures, as this dramatically reduces superficial wound dehiscence by 92% (RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02-0.35). 2

  • The continuous technique creates a continuous seal along the wound edge that better prevents bacterial invasion and provides prolonged wound support without requiring removal. 2

Critical Advantages of Absorbable Sutures for Facial Wounds

  • No suture removal required, which saves physician time and eliminates patient anxiety associated with removal procedures. 1

  • Equivalent long-term cosmetic results compared to non-absorbable sutures in clean facial wounds, with no difference in scar formation at 6-month follow-up. 1

  • Lower risk of wound dehiscence when using continuous subcuticular technique with absorbable material compared to interrupted non-absorbable sutures that require early removal. 2

Monofilament vs Multifilament

  • Prefer monofilament absorbable sutures over multifilament (braided) materials because monofilament causes less bacterial seeding and reduces infection risk. 3

  • While both 4-0 Vicryl (multifilament) and 4-0 Monocryl (monofilament) show comparable surgical site infection rates in some studies, monofilament theoretically offers lower bacterial colonization risk due to absence of interstices. 3, 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use rapidly absorbable sutures for deep fascial closure—reserve them only for skin closure where they provide adequate strength during the 7-10 day critical healing period. 3, 2

  • Avoid using tissue adhesives alone for facial lacerations >0.5 cm, as they carry a 3.35-fold higher risk of wound breakdown compared to sutures (NNT = 43 to prevent one dehiscence). 2

  • Do not use multifilament sutures in contaminated or high-risk wounds; switch to monofilament or consider triclosan-coated sutures to reduce infection risk (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.88). 3, 2

Post-Closure Care

  • Keep the wound clean and dry for the first 24-48 hours. 5

  • Monitor for signs of infection including increasing pain, redness, swelling, or discharge during the first 7-10 days. 2, 5

  • Absorbable sutures will dissolve completely between 42-56 days for rapidly absorbable materials (Vicryl Rapide) and 90-110 days for standard absorbable materials (Monocryl). 3, 6

References

Guideline

Wound Closure Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016

Guideline

Management of Wound Dehiscence Following Suture Removal

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques.

Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.