SeHCAT Test for Chronic Watery Diarrhoea
When to Order SeHCAT Testing
Order a SeHCAT test in patients with chronic watery diarrhoea after excluding infection, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and medication-induced causes, particularly when specific risk factors for bile acid malabsorption are present. 1
High-Priority Indications for Testing
- Terminal ileal disease or resection: Over 90% of patients with terminal ileal resection demonstrate abnormal SeHCAT retention, making this the strongest indication for testing 1
- Post-cholecystectomy diarrhoea: Up to 10% develop chronic diarrhoea through bile acid malabsorption 2
- Post-infectious diarrhoea: Well-documented association with subsequent bile acid malabsorption 1
- Crohn's disease in remission: Test when patients have ileal involvement without objective evidence of active inflammation but persistent diarrhoea 1, 3
- Idiopathic chronic diarrhoea or IBS-D: After negative first-line investigations, as approximately one-third of these patients have bile acid malabsorption 1
- Post-radiation therapy: Increasingly common given the three-fold rise in cancer survivors 1
Testing Sequence
The SeHCAT test should be positioned as a second-line investigation after basic screening has excluded common causes 1, 4. First-line testing must include complete blood count, C-reactive protein, IgA tissue transglutaminase with total IgA, faecal calprotectin, and Giardia testing 4, 3.
Test Methodology and Interpretation
How the Test Works
The patient ingests 75Se-homotaurocholic acid (a synthetic analogue of natural conjugated bile acid taurocholic acid), and retained radioactivity is measured by gamma camera at 7 days 1.
Interpretation Criteria
- Normal retention: ≥15% at 7 days 1
- Mild bile acid malabsorption: 10-15% retention 1
- Moderate bile acid malabsorption: 5-10% retention 1
- Severe bile acid malabsorption: <5% retention 1
Predictive Value for Treatment Response
Patients with SeHCAT retention <5% have the highest treatment response rates, with all patients in this category responding to cholestyramine in key studies. 1, 5
- <5% retention: Nearly 100% response to bile acid sequestrants 1, 5
- 5-10% retention: Approximately 38% response rate 1
- 10-15% retention: Minimal response (symptoms often compatible with IBS rather than true bile acid malabsorption) 1
- >15% retention: Only 15% response to treatment 5
Alternative Diagnostic Approaches
When SeHCAT is Unavailable
Use serum C4 (7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one) assay as the alternative diagnostic test when SeHCAT is not available. 1, 4
- Serum C4 correlates well with SeHCAT results and avoids radiolabels 1
- Sensitivity 40% and specificity 85% when compared to 48-hour faecal bile acid measurement 1
- FGF19 assay has lower diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 20%, specificity 75%) and cannot be recommended over C4 1
Empiric Treatment Trial
Empiric trials of cholestyramine may be considered when neither SeHCAT nor C4 testing is available, though formal diagnosis is strongly preferred. 1, 4
The British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines note that "the value of this approach has not been the subject of study" 1, and the 2018 guidelines emphasize making a positive diagnosis rather than blind empirical therapy 1.
Subsequent Management Based on Results
For Positive SeHCAT Results (<15% retention)
Start cholestyramine 4g once or twice daily with meals, titrating gradually to 2-12g/day based on symptom response. 2, 3
- Begin with gradual dose titration to minimize side effects (bloating, constipation, drug interactions) 3
- Approximately 70% of patients achieve clinical response overall 2
- Response rates approach 100% when retention is <5% 1, 5
- Alternative sequestrants (colesevelam or colestipol) can be used if cholestyramine is not tolerated 2, 3
For Negative SeHCAT Results (≥15% retention)
- Only 15% of patients with normal SeHCAT respond to bile acid sequestrants 5
- Pursue alternative diagnoses including microscopic colitis (requires colonoscopy with biopsies from right and left colon, not rectum) 1
- Consider lactose malabsorption, small bowel bacterial overgrowth, or functional diarrhoea 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume terminal ileal resection patients need testing before treatment: Given the extremely high pretest probability (>90%), diagnostic testing may not be necessary before initiating bile acid sequestrants in documented ileal resection 2
- Do not use bile acid sequestrants in extensive ileal resection (>100cm): These patients have fat malabsorption rather than bile acid diarrhoea and require different management 2, 3
- Do not rely on symptom presentation alone: No symptoms reliably predict bile acid diarrhoea diagnosis 3
- Do not overlook coexisting conditions: Treat underlying Crohn's disease, microscopic colitis, or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in addition to bile acid diarrhoea therapy when these conditions coexist 3
- Do not assume Rome IV criteria exclude organic disease: These criteria have only 52-74% specificity and do not reliably exclude bile acid diarrhoea 4, 3
Diagnostic Yield
Studies demonstrate that 56% of patients with unexplained chronic diarrhoea after full investigation have abnormal SeHCAT retention, making this a high-yield second-line test 5. In idiopathic chronic diarrhoea or IBS-D specifically, approximately one-third have evidence of bile acid malabsorption 1.