What is the significance of a frontal bone indentation identified on a routine mid‑trimester fetal anomaly scan, and what further imaging or specialist evaluation is recommended?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Frontal Bone Indentation on Anomaly Scan

A frontal bone indentation identified on mid-trimester anomaly scan requires immediate comprehensive evaluation for skeletal dysplasia, craniosynostosis, and associated structural anomalies, with referral to maternal-fetal medicine and genetics specialists for detailed ultrasound assessment, consideration of fetal MRI, and discussion of genetic testing options.

Clinical Significance and Differential Diagnosis

A frontal bone indentation represents an abnormal skull contour that may indicate:

  • Skeletal dysplasia with undermineralized skull – particularly severe forms such as osteogenesis imperfecta type II, achondrogenesis, or hypophosphatasia, which can present with abnormal skull mineralization patterns at the 18-20 week anatomical survey 1, 2
  • Craniosynostosis – specifically frontosphenoidal suture synostosis, which develops during the second trimester and causes recession of the lateral frontal bone and supraorbital rim 3
  • Isolated ossification defects – rare congenital frontal bone aplasia or ossification defects, though these are uncommon 4

The earlier in gestation that skeletal and structural anomalies are detected, generally the worse the clinical phenotype of the affected fetus 1.

Immediate Evaluation Protocol

Comprehensive Ultrasound Assessment

Perform a detailed anatomical survey to determine if the frontal bone indentation is isolated or part of a constellation of findings 5:

  • Skeletal evaluation: Measure all long bones (femur length, humerus length) and compare to gestational age nomograms; look for short limb length (<5th percentile or >2 SD below mean), angular deformities or bowing of long bones, and abnormal chest configuration including bell-shaped thorax or short ribs 1, 2, 6
  • Skull assessment: Evaluate for undermineralized skull (appears abnormally lucent), abnormal skull shape, and other cranial bone abnormalities 1
  • Facial structures: Assess for flat nasal bridge, absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, micrognathia, and cleft lip/palate 5, 7
  • Other soft markers: Look for increased nuchal fold thickness (≥6 mm), echogenic intracardiac focus, echogenic bowel, and shortened long bones 1
  • Additional anomalies: Screen for congenital heart disease, renal anomalies, brain abnormalities, and other structural defects 1, 8

Advanced Imaging Considerations

  • 3D ultrasound can better characterize skull contour abnormalities, cranial sutures, and skeletal deformities 5, 7
  • Fetal MRI should be considered for detailed evaluation of the skull, brain, palate, and other structures when ultrasound findings are suboptimal or additional detail is needed 1, 8, 7
  • Avoid plain radiography and CT during pregnancy due to radiation exposure concerns and inability to secure precise fetal positioning 1

Specialist Referral and Genetic Counseling

Immediate referral to maternal-fetal medicine specialist and clinical geneticist with skeletal dysplasia expertise is mandatory 8:

  • Consultation should occur in a timely fashion to optimize therapeutic options and provide unbiased counseling respectful of patient choice, culture, religion, and beliefs 8
  • Multidisciplinary evaluation allows for accurate diagnosis, prognosis discussion, and informed decision-making 1

Aneuploidy Risk Assessment

If No Prior Aneuploidy Screening

When a frontal bone indentation is accompanied by other skeletal features (shortened/bowed limbs, abnormal chest/ribs, undermineralized skull), this constellation is highly suggestive of severe skeletal dysplasia 1:

  • Offer cell-free DNA screening or quad screen if cfDNA is unavailable or cost-prohibitive 1
  • Discuss diagnostic amniocentesis based on clinical circumstances and patient preference, particularly if multiple anomalies are present 1
  • Counsel on the probability of chromosomal abnormalities, as structural anomalies may be part of a genetic syndrome despite normal karyotype 8

If Prior Screening Was Negative

  • No further aneuploidy evaluation is typically needed if isolated finding with negative cfDNA or serum screening 1
  • However, structural anomalies may still represent genetic syndromes, sequences, or associations despite normal karyotype 8

Genetic Testing Strategy

Prenatal next-generation skeletal panel gene sequencing or whole exome/genome testing should be offered to increase diagnostic yield when skeletal dysplasia is suspected 1, 2:

  • Genomic test results must be ordered and interpreted by a qualified expert (clinical geneticist with skeletal dysplasia expertise) and correlated with clinical findings 1
  • Retain fetal DNA for future testing if diagnosis remains unclear 2
  • Parental blood testing may be required to clarify diagnosis, particularly for potentially dominant inheritance patterns 8

Serial Monitoring and Follow-up

Repeat ultrasound examinations at intervals depending on the anomaly to assess evolution and detect additional anomalies not previously identified 8:

  • This influences counseling and obstetrical/perinatal management 8
  • For isolated shortened long bones or skeletal concerns, perform third-trimester ultrasound for reassessment and growth evaluation 1

Delivery Planning and Postnatal Management

If early or urgent postnatal management may be required, delivery at a tertiary center with appropriate neonatal care capabilities should be strongly considered 8:

  • Referral to appropriate pediatric subspecialists (pediatric neurosurgery, craniofacial surgery, genetics) should occur prenatally to provide accurate information on prognosis and management 8
  • Comprehensive newborn assessment is essential for diagnosis and counseling on etiology, prognosis, and recurrence risk, especially when etiology has not been clearly identified prenatally 8
  • Postnatal skeletal radiographic survey should be performed if skeletal dysplasia was suspected prenatally 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not dismiss as normal variant without thorough evaluation – frontal bone indentation may be the first clue to severe skeletal dysplasia or craniosynostosis 1, 3
  • Do not rely solely on 2D ultrasound – utilize 3D ultrasound and fetal MRI when available to better characterize skull and skeletal abnormalities 1, 5, 7
  • Do not order genetic testing without expert interpretation – genomic results require filtering and correlation with phenotype by specialists to avoid misdiagnosis 1
  • Do not assume normal karyotype excludes genetic syndrome – many structural anomalies represent recognizable syndromes with non-chromosomal genetic basis 8

If Pregnancy Termination or Fetal Demise Occurs

Strongly encourage complete autopsy by perinatal or pediatric pathologist to provide maximum diagnostic information 8:

  • If complete autopsy is refused, at minimum obtain partial/external autopsy with X-rays and photographs 8
  • This information is crucial for counseling on recurrence risk in future pregnancies 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Radiological Features of Skeletal Dysplasia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Prenatal Diagnosis and Management of Clinodactyly

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fetal Development and Skeletal Dysplasia Detection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities.

Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2019

Research

Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.