Additional Therapy for Persistent Vision Loss in MOGAD Optic Neuritis
For this patient with MOGAD-related bilateral optic neuritis showing no visual improvement one month after IV methylprednisolone, plasma exchange (PLEX) or IVIG should be initiated immediately, followed by consideration of rituximab for long-term relapse prevention. 1, 2
Immediate Second-Line Interventions
Plasma Exchange (PLEX)
- PLEX is the most strongly recommended rescue therapy for steroid-refractory MOG-associated optic neuritis, particularly when vision has not improved after initial corticosteroid treatment 3, 1
- Should be administered as 5-7 exchanges over 10-14 days, with each session removing approximately 1-1.5 plasma volumes 3
- Early initiation of PLEX (within 4-6 weeks of symptom onset) may prevent persisting visual loss and improve long-term outcomes 4
- PLEX is particularly effective in MOGAD when initiated promptly after steroid failure, as delays beyond this window significantly reduce efficacy 5, 4
Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG)
- IVIG at 2 g/kg divided over 5 days (0.4 g/kg/day) is an alternative to PLEX, particularly useful in MOG-positive optic neuritis 3, 1
- Can be combined with repeat pulse methylprednisolone (1 g IV daily for 3-5 days) if not already attempted 3
- Note: If PLEX is planned after IVIG, allow adequate time between therapies as plasmapheresis will remove the administered immunoglobulin 3
Long-Term Immunosuppressive Therapy
Rituximab (First Choice)
- Rituximab is the most consistently effective immunomodulatory therapy for relapsing MOG-associated optic neuritis and should be strongly considered for this patient given the severity (bilateral involvement) and lack of response 1, 6, 4
- Typically dosed at 1000 mg IV on days 1 and 15, then repeated every 6 months based on CD19/CD20 B-cell monitoring 6, 4
- Shows superior efficacy compared to azathioprine in reducing relapse rates in MOG-associated disease 2, 4
Alternative Maintenance Immunosuppressants
- Mycophenolate mofetil (already initiated in this patient) can serve as a steroid-sparing maintenance agent, though it may be less effective than rituximab for preventing relapses 1, 6, 7
- Azathioprine is another option but appears less effective than rituximab based on comparative data 2, 6
- Monthly IVIG can be used for maintenance therapy in patients who cannot tolerate other immunosuppressants 6
Critical Pitfalls and Monitoring
Steroid Tapering Considerations
- Relapses occur in 50-60% of MOG-associated optic neuritis patients during rapid corticosteroid taper, which is a major cause of treatment failure 1, 2, 5
- MOG-associated optic neuritis is frequently associated with flare-ups if steroids are tapered too quickly, and this entity underlies many cases of "chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy" (CRION) 4
- Consider maintaining low-dose oral prednisone (5-10 mg daily) while establishing maintenance immunotherapy, then taper very slowly over 6-12 months 4
Avoid MS Disease-Modifying Therapies
- Do not use interferon-beta or natalizumab in MOG-positive patients, as these MS therapies can worsen disease activity and increase relapse rates 1, 4
- This is a critical distinction from MS-associated optic neuritis and represents a common treatment error 1
Essential Monitoring
- Ophthalmological evaluations every 4-6 weeks including visual acuity, visual fields, funduscopy, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess for optic nerve atrophy 5, 7
- Visual evoked potentials to objectively assess optic nerve recovery and detect subclinical bilateral involvement 2, 5
- Repeat MRI brain and orbits with contrast at 3-6 months to assess for new demyelinating lesions 5
- Monitor for optic disc swelling resolution and development of optic atrophy on OCT (peripapillary RNFL and macular GCL thickness) 7
Prognostic Considerations
- Despite severe initial vision loss in MOG-associated optic neuritis, visual recovery is typically better than in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, though delayed treatment significantly worsens prognosis 6, 4, 8
- The one-month timepoint without improvement in this patient is concerning and warrants aggressive escalation, as delays beyond 2 weeks from symptom onset are associated with poorer outcomes 2, 5
- Bilateral involvement at presentation increases the risk of relapsing disease and supports the need for long-term immunosuppression 9, 8