Which of the following is a contraindication to a non‑contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

An Implanted Neurostimulator is a Contraindication to Non-Contrast MRI

The correct answer is B: An implanted neurostimulator represents a contraindication to non-contrast MRI unless the device is specifically labeled as MRI-conditional and manufacturer-specified scanning conditions are strictly followed. 1, 2

Why Neurostimulators Are Contraindicated

Traditional Absolute Contraindication

  • The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery explicitly states that the presence of implantable medical devices such as pacemakers and neurostimulators precludes MRI scanning. 1
  • Neurostimulators pose multiple safety risks during MRI including heating of leads, magnetic field interactions causing device displacement, induced electrical currents in the leads, and functional disruption of the device. 3
  • Failure to follow strict safety protocols has resulted in serious injuries including transient dystonia, paralysis, coma, and even death. 3

Modern MRI-Conditional Devices Require Special Protocols

  • Most contemporary neurostimulators are classified as MRI-conditional rather than absolutely unsafe, meaning they can be scanned only when manufacturer-specified conditions are met (specific field strength limits, patient positioning, and scanning protocols). 2
  • MRI-conditional neurostimulators require consultation with the electrophysiology team and strict adherence to manufacturer protocols before any scanning can proceed. 2
  • Even when deemed MRI-conditional, these devices generate significant image artifacts that can compromise diagnostic quality. 2

Why the Other Options Are NOT Contraindications

A. Cardiac Stent Placed 6 Months Ago

  • Coronary artery stents are MRI-safe at field strengths up to 3 Tesla with no waiting period required. 2
  • Cardiac stents do not pose any risk of migration or thrombosis during MRI, though they may cause local artifacts (an image quality issue, not a safety concern). 2

C. History of Migraines

  • A history of migraine is not listed as an MRI contraindication in any current guideline. 2
  • MRI is routinely employed to evaluate patients with headache or other neurological symptoms without restriction based on migraine history. 2

Mandatory Pre-MRI Screening Protocol

Essential Steps Before Any MRI

  • Every patient must complete a standardized safety questionnaire screening for implants, ports, catheters, metallic devices, vascular stents, coils, active devices, cardiac pacemakers, and other foreign bodies. 2
  • Verification of the patient's implant documentation (manufacturer, model, material composition, and MRI safety classification) is required prior to scanning. 2
  • If implant documentation is unavailable, online resources (e.g., https://mrisafety.com/) should be consulted to confirm the device's safety level. 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Common Errors in MRI Safety Assessment

  • Do not confuse vascular stents with cardiac pacemakers or neurostimulators—they have completely different safety profiles. 2
  • Do not assume all neurostimulators are absolutely contraindicated—many modern devices are MRI-conditional and can be scanned safely when protocol requirements are met. 2
  • Recognize that artifact does not equal danger—coronary stents cause local artifacts but this is an image quality issue, not a safety concern. 2

When Neurostimulators Can Be Scanned

  • If the neurostimulator is confirmed to be MRI-conditional through manufacturer documentation, scanning may proceed only after: 2, 4
    • Verifying specific field strength limits (typically 1.5T with send/receive head RF coil only)
    • Limiting specific absorption rate to manufacturer specifications (often ≤0.4 W/kg)
    • Consulting with the device manufacturer and electrophysiology team
    • Implementing continuous patient monitoring during the scan
  • Deep brain stimulators with tested leads (such as ITREL II and 3 connected to an IPG) have been studied and may be scanned under strict conditions, but this requires device-specific verification. 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

MRI Safety Guidelines for Patients with Metal Implants

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

MRI in Adult Patients with Active and Inactive Implanted MR-conditional, MR-nonconditional, and Other Devices.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.