Cancer Pain Treatment: WHO Analgesic Ladder Multimodal Approach
Cancer pain should be treated using the WHO three-step analgesic ladder, starting with non-opioids for mild pain, escalating to weak opioids (or low-dose strong opioids) for moderate pain, and advancing to strong opioids for severe pain, with non-opioid analgesics and adjuvants continued at every step. 1
Core Principle: Match Drug to Pain Intensity
The WHO ladder is a sequential, intensity-based system where analgesic selection is determined by numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, not by arbitrary time intervals or patient preference. 1, 2
Step 1: Mild Pain (NRS ≤3–4)
- Start with acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500–1000 mg every 4–6 hours, maximum 4000 mg/day. 1, 2, 3
- NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac) are equally appropriate first-line alternatives or can be combined with acetaminophen for additive effect. 1, 2, 3
- NSAIDs demonstrate superiority over placebo in single-dose cancer pain studies, though no individual NSAID shows superior efficacy over others. 1
- Monitor long-term NSAID use (>7–10 days) for gastrointestinal bleeding, platelet dysfunction, renal impairment, and cardiovascular thrombotic events. 1, 2
- COX-2 selective inhibitors reduce GI risk but increase cardiovascular thrombotic events and do not protect against renal failure. 1, 2
Step 2: Moderate Pain (NRS 4–6)
This step is controversial and may be bypassed in favor of low-dose strong opioids. 1, 2
Traditional Approach:
- Combine weak opioids (codeine, tramadol, dihydrocodeine) with acetaminophen or NSAIDs. 1
- Tramadol shows no analgesic superiority over codeine or hydrocodone but produces significantly higher rates of nausea, vomiting, vertigo, anorexia, and asthenia. 1
Evidence Against Step 2:
- Meta-analyses find no significant difference in effectiveness between non-opioid analgesics alone versus combinations with weak opioids. 1
- Weak opioids exhibit a "ceiling effect" where doses above a threshold increase adverse effects without enhancing analgesia. 1, 2
- Clinical experience shows Step 2 effectiveness typically lasts only 30–40 days before escalation to Step 3 becomes necessary due to inadequate analgesia, not intolerable side effects. 1, 2
Alternative Approach (ESMO-endorsed):
- Consider low-dose strong opioids (e.g., oral morphine 5 mg every 4 hours) combined with non-opioid analgesics instead of weak opioids. 1, 2
- This bypasses the ceiling effect and avoids the inevitable transition from weak to strong opioids. 1, 2
Step 3: Severe Pain (NRS ≥7)
Morphine is the gold-standard strong opioid for moderate-severe cancer pain. 2, 4
Morphine Initiation in Opioid-Naïve Patients:
Oral route (preferred when tolerated):
- Immediate-release morphine 5 mg every 4 hours scheduled, plus 5 mg every 1 hour as needed for breakthrough pain. 2, 4
Intravenous route (for severe pain requiring rapid control):
- Administer 1.5 mg IV every 10 minutes until adequate relief or adverse effects occur. 2, 4
- Median effective dose is 4.5 mg (range 1.5–34.5 mg). 2, 4
- IV titration achieves satisfactory relief in 84% of patients at 1 hour versus 25% with oral morphine; by 12 hours, 97% versus 76% achieve relief. 2, 4
Rescue Dosing and Titration:
- Set rescue doses at 10–15% of total daily opioid dose. 2, 4
- If >4 rescue doses are required in 24 hours, increase the baseline long-acting opioid dose. 2, 4
- The number of rescue doses taken is the primary guide for daily titration of regular doses. 1
Alternative Strong Opioids:
- Fentanyl, oxycodone, hydromorphone, methadone, or buprenorphine may be used when morphine is contraindicated or not tolerated. 1, 2
- Avoid morphine in significant renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min); use fentanyl or buprenorphine instead. 2, 4
- Never use fentanyl transdermal patches for rapid titration. 2, 4
Universal Principles Across All Steps
Route of Administration
Oral administration is preferred unless contraindicated by:
- Severe vomiting, bowel obstruction, severe dysphagia, or severe confusion. 1, 2
- Need for rapid dose escalation or intolerable oral opioid side effects. 1, 2
Dosing Schedule
- Use "by the clock" (scheduled, around-the-clock) dosing rather than "as needed" dosing to prevent pain rather than chase it. 2
- This aligns with drug pharmacokinetics and maintains steady analgesic blood levels. 2
Multimodal Combination Therapy
- Continue non-opioid analgesics (acetaminophen/NSAIDs) at every step unless contraindicated. 1, 2
- Opioids may be combined with non-opioids and adjuvant drugs (antidepressants, anticonvulsants for neuropathic pain) at any ladder step. 1
Breakthrough Cancer Pain (BTcP)
- Proactively prescribe rescue medication for breakthrough pain episodes, which are typically moderate-severe, rapid-onset (minutes), and short-duration (median ~30 minutes). 1, 2
- The frequency of rescue doses directly informs titration of the regular opioid regimen. 2
Mandatory Side-Effect Prophylaxis
- Initiate stimulant laxatives from the first opioid dose, as opioid-induced constipation occurs in nearly all patients. 2, 4
- Provide antiemetics, especially during the initial days of opioid therapy. 2, 4
Incorporate Non-Pharmacological Interventions
- Primary antitumor treatments (radiation, chemotherapy, surgery) address the pain source. 1
- Psychological interventions (cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation techniques) and rehabilitative therapies (physical therapy, occupational therapy) complement pharmacological management. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay strong opioid initiation when pain reaches NRS ≥7; this reflects opioid-phobia and compromises patient comfort. 2
- Do not rely on "as needed" dosing for chronic cancer pain; scheduled dosing is essential for adequate control. 2
- Do not omit prophylactic laxatives at opioid initiation; this leads to preventable constipation. 2
- Do not initiate NSAIDs before trying acetaminophen alone, especially in elderly patients or those with renal impairment, bleeding risk, or cardiovascular disease. 2, 3
- Do not exceed maximum daily doses: acetaminophen 4000 mg, naproxen 1000 mg. 3
- Do not use opioid-containing combinations as first-line therapy when non-opioid alternatives would be effective. 3
Evidence Quality and Endorsement
The WHO analgesic ladder, despite methodological limitations in validation studies (small samples, retrospective designs, high dropout rates, lack of robust controlled trials), remains the internationally endorsed reference standard for cancer pain management. 1, 2 It is supported by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and other major oncology societies worldwide. 1, 2