BISAP Score in Acute Pancreatitis
What is BISAP?
The Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) is a 5-point prognostic tool that should be calculated within the first 24 hours of presentation to identify patients at increased risk of mortality and severe disease, with a score ≥2 serving as the critical cutoff for severe acute pancreatitis, organ failure risk, and need for ICU-level care. 1, 2
How to Calculate BISAP
The score assigns 1 point for each of the following five parameters present within 24 hours of admission: 2, 3
- Blood urea nitrogen >25 mg/dL
- Impaired mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale <15)
- Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) present
- Age >60 years
- Pleural effusion detected on imaging
Total possible score ranges from 0 to 5 points. 2
Score Interpretation and Mortality Prediction
Critical Cutoff Values
BISAP ≥2 is the statistically significant cutoff for severe acute pancreatitis, organ failure, and increased mortality risk. 1, 3 This threshold mandates immediate transfer to an intensive-care setting, ideally within 24 hours. 1
BISAP ≥3 indicates significantly elevated mortality risk and ICU admission is strongly recommended. 3 At this threshold, the score demonstrates 100% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity for predicting mortality. 4
Predictive Performance
The score achieves an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of approximately 0.80 for predicting severe pancreatitis and 0.93 for predicting organ failure. 1, 2 For mortality prediction specifically, the AUC ranges from 0.82 to 0.94 across validation studies. 5, 6
BISAP identifies patients at heightened mortality risk BEFORE organ failure develops, unlike traditional 48-hour scoring systems. 1, 3 This represents its key clinical advantage over Ranson and Glasgow scores. 1
Comparison with Other Scoring Systems
Advantages Over Traditional Scores
BISAP outperforms Ranson criteria, CT severity index, CRP, hematocrit, and BMI for predicting severity and organ failure. 3, 7 The diagnostic performance is comparable to APACHE-II (sensitivity approximately 70-74%, specificity approximately 86-90%) while being far simpler to compute at the bedside. 1
BISAP can be completed within 24 hours, whereas Ranson and Glasgow scores require 48 hours, preventing early risk stratification and potentially delaying necessary interventions. 1, 3
Relative Performance
BISAP demonstrates higher specificity (91%) but lower sensitivity (51-56%) compared to Ranson criteria and APACHE-II for both mortality and severe disease. 3, 8 This means BISAP will miss some high-risk patients but has fewer false positives. 3
APACHE-II remains the gold-standard for ongoing daily monitoring despite its complexity, offering the highest predictive accuracy for mortality (AUC 0.88-0.93) among available scoring systems. 1, 2
Clinical Management Algorithm Guided by BISAP
Within First 24 Hours
- Calculate BISAP score immediately upon presentation. 1, 2
- Obtain baseline labs including CRP, hematocrit, and BUN. 1 Elevated hematocrit independently predicts pancreatic necrosis, and elevated BUN independently predicts mortality. 1
- Assess for clinical organ failure (pulmonary, circulatory, or renal), which constitutes severe disease regardless of scoring results and supersedes all scores. 1, 2
BISAP ≥2: Immediate Actions
- Transfer to ICU or step-down unit for intensive monitoring. 3 Most transfers occur within 72 hours, but ideally should happen within 24 hours. 1
- Do NOT initiate prophylactic antibiotics based on score alone (Grade 1A evidence). 1, 3 Prophylactic antibiotics provide no mortality or morbidity benefit in sterile necrosis and should be reserved only for documented infected necrosis. 1
48-Hour Reassessment
- If BISAP is high or clinical picture is equivocal, calculate APACHE-II score for ongoing monitoring. 1 An APACHE-II ≥8 defines severe acute pancreatitis; threshold ≥6 yields approximately 95% sensitivity for complications. 1, 2
- Repeat APACHE-II daily to track disease trajectory. 1
Day 3 Assessment
- Measure CRP on day 3; markedly elevated CRP (≥150 mg/L) indicates severe disease. 1, 2 Peak CRP >210 mg/L in the first four days predicts severity with approximately 80% accuracy. 1, 2
Days 3-10: Imaging
- Perform contrast-enhanced CT with CT Severity Index (CTSI) calculation in patients with predicted severe disease, but not before day 3 to avoid underestimation of necrosis. 1, 2 CTSI ≥3 indicates severe disease, with scores 7-10 associated with approximately 92% morbidity and 17% mortality. 1, 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely on BISAP alone—combine with CRP trends and clinical organ-failure assessment for comprehensive risk stratification. 1, 3 Clinical assessment alone misclassifies roughly half of patients. 1
Do not postpone aggressive management while awaiting 48-hour scores in patients with high BISAP or clear clinical severity. 1
Recognize that BISAP has suboptimal sensitivity (51-56%), meaning it will miss some high-risk patients. 3, 8 Therefore, maintain high clinical suspicion even with lower scores if the patient appears clinically severe. 3
Continuously monitor for development of organ failure, as its occurrence definitively defines severe disease and overrides all scoring systems. 1, 2
Do not use procalcitonin for severity assessment—it is highly sensitive for detecting pancreatic infection, with low levels strongly predicting absence of infected necrosis, but should not guide initial severity grading. 1