Yes, a TR5 thyroid nodule measuring 8–9×14 mm absolutely requires fine-needle aspiration biopsy
A solid thyroid nodule classified as TIRADS TR5 at 14 mm in maximum diameter meets the established size threshold for FNA (≥1.0 cm for TR5 nodules) and carries a malignancy risk of approximately 35–80%, making biopsy mandatory regardless of the absence of symptoms. 1, 2
Why This Nodule Requires Biopsy
Size and Risk Classification Mandate FNA
The American College of Radiology TIRADS guidelines explicitly recommend FNA for TR5 nodules ≥5 mm, and your nodule at 14 mm far exceeds this threshold. 2
TR5 classification indicates the presence of multiple highly suspicious ultrasound features such as marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins, solid composition, or taller-than-wide shape—features that substantially increase malignancy probability. 1, 2
Current evidence demonstrates that TIRADS ≥4 detects malignant nodules with 91.67% sensitivity, making it a reliable predictor when combined with appropriate size thresholds. 3
The False-Negative Risk of Avoiding Biopsy
Delaying or avoiding FNA in TR5 nodules ≥1 cm results in missed cancers, with studies showing that adjusting size thresholds to capture nodules ≥1.0 cm significantly reduces the number of undiagnosed malignancies. 4
Large nodules (≥3 cm) with benign cytology carry a 3.6% false-negative rate, but your nodule at 1.4 cm falls within the optimal size range where FNA accuracy is highest and false-negative rates are minimized. 5
The combination of TR5 classification and solid composition creates a cumulative risk that cannot be dismissed based on size alone—multiple high-risk features substantially elevate malignancy probability beyond baseline estimates. 1
Procedural Approach
Ultrasound-Guided FNA Is the Gold Standard
Ultrasound guidance is mandatory for thyroid nodule FNA because it allows real-time needle visualization, confirms accurate sampling of the solid component, and is superior to palpation-guided biopsy in accuracy, patient comfort, and cost-effectiveness. 1
The procedure should target the solid portion of the nodule, as solid components carry the highest malignancy risk compared to cystic areas. 1
Pre-FNA Evaluation
Measure serum TSH before FNA to exclude hyperfunctioning nodules, which have a very high negative predictive value for malignancy and would alter management. 1, 6
Perform a comprehensive neck ultrasound to evaluate cervical lymph nodes for suspicious features such as loss of fatty hilum, microcalcifications, cystic change, or abnormal vascularity, as lymph node involvement would upstage disease and influence surgical planning. 1
Interpreting FNA Results
Bethesda II (benign) results carry a 1–3% malignancy risk and typically warrant surveillance rather than surgery, but a reassuring FNA should not override worrisome clinical findings, as false-negative results occur in up to 11–33% of cases with high clinical suspicion. 1
Bethesda III (AUS/FLUS) or IV (follicular neoplasm) results require molecular testing (BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, PAX8/PPARγ) to refine malignancy risk and guide surgical decision-making, as 97% of mutation-positive nodules are malignant. 1
Bethesda V (suspicious) or VI (malignant) cytology mandates immediate referral to an endocrine surgeon for total or near-total thyroidectomy with pre-operative lymph node compartment assessment. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do Not Rely on Size Alone to Defer Biopsy
The argument that "small" nodules (<1.5 cm) can be observed is invalid for TR5 lesions, as the TIRADS classification already incorporates multiple high-risk features that override size considerations. 2
Nodules measuring 1.0–1.5 cm with TR5 features have malignancy rates comparable to larger nodules, making observation inappropriate when suspicious sonographic characteristics are present. 3
Do Not Assume Normal Thyroid Function Excludes Cancer
Most thyroid cancers occur in euthyroid patients with normal TSH levels, so thyroid function tests cannot substitute for FNA in risk assessment. 1
Hyperfunctioning nodules (hot nodules on scintigraphy) are the only functional status that reliably excludes malignancy, but this requires thyroid scintigraphy, which is not routinely performed in euthyroid patients. 6
Do Not Delay FNA for Short-Term Observation
Observation for 4–6 weeks is appropriate only for suspected infectious or inflammatory conditions, not for solid thyroid nodules with high-risk ultrasound features. 1
Clinical examination alone cannot reliably differentiate benign from malignant nodules, and reliance on palpation may delay diagnosis. 1
High-Risk Clinical Factors That Further Support FNA
Patient-Specific Risk Factors
History of head and neck irradiation increases malignancy risk approximately 7-fold, lowering the threshold for FNA even in smaller nodules. 1
Family history of thyroid cancer, particularly medullary carcinoma or familial syndromes, warrants FNA even for nodules <1 cm. 1
Age <15 years or male gender increases baseline malignancy probability, making FNA more urgent in these populations. 1
Nodule-Specific Features
Rapid growth is one of the strongest predictors of malignancy, and any documented enlargement ≥3 mm during surveillance mandates cytological evaluation. 1
Firm, fixed nodule on palpation indicates extrathyroidal extension, suggesting invasive disease that requires immediate workup. 1
Vocal cord paralysis or compressive symptoms suggest aggressive biology, warranting expedited FNA and surgical consultation. 1
What Happens If FNA Is Not Performed
Missed Diagnosis and Treatment Delay
Avoiding FNA in TR5 nodules ≥1 cm results in delayed cancer diagnosis, potentially allowing progression from localized disease to regional or distant metastasis. 4
The false-negative rate of "no biopsy" is 100%—you cannot diagnose cancer without tissue sampling, and observation alone provides no diagnostic information. 1
Inability to Stage or Plan Treatment
Cancer subtype cannot be reliably determined preoperatively without FNA, limiting the ability to counsel patients about prognosis and treatment options. 1
Surgical planning requires pre-operative knowledge of malignancy status, as the extent of thyroidectomy (lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy) and need for lymph node dissection depend on cytologic and molecular findings. 1
Algorithm for Decision-Making
Confirm TR5 classification by reviewing ultrasound features: solid composition, marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins, or taller-than-wide shape. 2
Measure maximum nodule diameter—if ≥5 mm (and certainly if ≥10 mm as in your case), FNA is indicated per ACR TIRADS. 2
Obtain serum TSH to exclude hyperfunctioning nodules; if TSH is suppressed, proceed to thyroid scintigraphy before FNA. 1, 6
Perform comprehensive neck ultrasound to assess cervical lymph nodes for suspicious features. 1
Schedule ultrasound-guided FNA targeting the solid component of the nodule. 1
Interpret cytology using Bethesda classification and proceed with molecular testing (Bethesda III/IV) or surgical referral (Bethesda V/VI) as indicated. 1
If Bethesda II (benign), initiate surveillance with repeat ultrasound at 12–24 months, but maintain high clinical suspicion if discordant features are present. 1