New Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
For progressive RA-ILD despite first-line immunosuppression, add nintedanib as the preferred antifibrotic agent, or pirfenidone if nintedanib is not tolerated. 1, 2
First-Line Treatment Approach
The 2023 ACR/CHEST guidelines establish immunosuppression—not antifibrotics—as the foundation for initial RA-ILD management. 1
Preferred first-line immunosuppressive agents include: 1, 2
- Mycophenolate (most preferred)
- Rituximab (especially when active inflammatory arthritis coexists with ILD, as it addresses both joint disease and may reduce ILD mortality) 2
- Azathioprine
- Cyclophosphamide (particularly for severe cases)
Short-term glucocorticoids (≤3 months) can be used as bridging therapy while immunosuppression takes effect, but long-term steroids must be avoided in progressive disease. 1, 2
Avoid these agents in RA-ILD: methotrexate, leflunomide, TNF inhibitors, and abatacept—discontinue if ILD develops while on these medications. 2
Defining Progressive Disease
Progression despite immunosuppression is defined by any of the following: 2
- ≥10% predicted decline in FVC within 24 months
- 5-10% predicted FVC decline plus worsening respiratory symptoms or increased fibrosis on HRCT
- Worsening respiratory symptoms together with increased fibrosis on HRCT
New Antifibrotic Options for Progressive RA-ILD
This represents the major therapeutic advance in RA-ILD management.
For patients meeting progression criteria despite first-line immunosuppression: 1, 2
- Add nintedanib (preferred antifibrotic—reduces FVC decline rate by 60% over 52 weeks in progressive RA-ILD) 3
- Add pirfenidone (alternative when nintedanib not tolerated or contraindicated) 1, 2
Real-world data from 2024 demonstrates that antifibrotic initiation in progressive RA-ILD achieves modest FVC improvement (+4.7% at 1 year, +7.7% at 2 years) and DLCO stabilization, though discontinuation rates reach 37% due to adverse events—primarily gastrointestinal symptoms and hepatitis. 4
Critical caveat: Pirfenidone is specifically recommended for progressive RA-ILD only—the guidelines conditionally recommend against pirfenidone for other systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILDs. 1
When NOT to Initiate Antifibrotics
Do not add antifibrotics in patients stable on mycophenolate without evidence of ILD progression—continue immunosuppression and monitor regularly. 2
Do not use upfront combination therapy (antifibrotic plus mycophenolate) before documented disease progression. 2
Additional Second-Line Options for Progressive Disease
Beyond antifibrotics, the following can be considered for RA-ILD progression: 1
- Tocilizumab (conditionally recommended for progressive RA-ILD)
- Switching to or adding rituximab (if not already used)
- Mycophenolate (if switching from another agent)
- Cyclophosphamide (despite toxicity concerns, observational data supports FVC stabilization)
Emerging Therapies
Abatacept is emerging as a potential first-line option for RA-ILD based on retrospective data, though it is not yet included in formal guideline recommendations. 5
Immunosuppression should be considered regardless of imaging pattern—even UIP pattern on HRCT may respond to immunosuppressive therapy, challenging older paradigms. 5
Practical Management Algorithm
- Initiate first-line immunosuppression (mycophenolate preferred; rituximab if active arthritis present) 1, 2
- Add short-term glucocorticoids (≤3 months) as bridge therapy 2
- Monitor for progression using PFTs at 3 months and HRCT at 6 months 2
- If progression occurs: Add nintedanib (or pirfenidone if nintedanib not tolerated) 1, 2, 4
- Consider tocilizumab as alternative second-line agent 1
- Early lung transplant referral when requiring high-flow oxygen or demonstrating rapid progression despite optimal therapy 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely on long-term glucocorticoids for progressive ILD—use only as temporary bridge. 1, 2
Do not continue methotrexate, leflunomide, TNF inhibitors, or abatacept if RA-ILD develops. 2
Do not delay antifibrotic initiation once progression is documented—real-world data shows meaningful FVC stabilization when started appropriately. 4
Anticipate antifibrotic adverse events: 81% of patients experience side effects (predominantly gastrointestinal and hepatic), requiring dose reduction in 40% of nintedanib and 14% of pirfenidone patients. 4
Essential Co-Management
Multidisciplinary collaboration with pulmonology is mandatory for treatment initiation, monitoring response, and escalation decisions. 2