Can a 57-year-old man with a PSA (prostate-specific antigen) of 17 ng/mL and a PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 5 peripheral zone lesion undergo robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Be Performed for High-Risk Prostate Cancer?

Yes, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a technically feasible and safe surgical approach for this patient, though radiation therapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the preferred treatment for high-risk disease based on superior oncologic outcomes. 1, 2, 3

Critical Pre-Operative Requirements

Before proceeding with any definitive therapy, a tissue biopsy with Gleason grading is mandatory, even with a PI-RADS 5 lesion and PSA of 17 ng/mL, because imaging alone cannot definitively confirm malignancy or determine grade. 3 While one recent study showed 95% cancer detection in PI-RADS 5 lesions without biopsy 4, this contradicts established guideline recommendations that require histologic confirmation before radical treatment. 3

Mandatory Staging Work-Up

  • Bone scintigraphy is required because PSA ≥17 ng/mL places this patient at substantial risk for occult bone metastases, even if asymptomatic. 5, 3
  • Pelvic MRI or CT must assess lymph node status and local tumor extension (T-stage), as any suspicious nodes should be biopsied before treatment planning. 3
  • Digital rectal examination must differentiate T3a (extracapsular extension) from T3b/T4 (seminal-vesicle or adjacent-structure involvement) to guide risk categorization and determine if surgery is appropriate. 3

Treatment Selection Based on Risk Stratification

The Gleason score from biopsy will determine the optimal treatment pathway:

If Gleason 7 (Intermediate Risk)

  • RARP is an accepted standard option, with oncologic outcomes comparable to external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus 4-6 months of ADT. 3
  • Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is recommended when nomogram-based risk of nodal involvement exceeds 10%. 3
  • Robotic/laparoscopic techniques are associated with less blood loss than open retropubic prostatectomy. 1

If Gleason 8-10 (High Risk)

  • EBRT combined with long-term ADT (2-3 years) is the preferred approach, achieving 91% 9-year disease-specific survival with trimodality therapy (EBRT + brachytherapy + ADT). 3
  • RARP with extended PLND may be offered only to highly selected patients, but surgery alone yields progression-free survival of approximately 36% versus 91% with radiation-based regimens. 3
  • If surgery is performed, adjuvant radiation is typically required when pathology reveals seminal-vesicle invasion, positive margins, or extraprostatic extension. 2, 3

Technical Feasibility and Safety of RARP

RARP can be performed safely in this 57-year-old patient with acceptable perioperative outcomes:

  • Minimally invasive approaches are linked to shorter hospitalizations, reduced need for blood transfusion, and fewer surgical complications compared with open radical prostatectomy. 2
  • Mean operative time ranges 132-175 minutes with estimated blood loss 80-200 mL in contemporary robotic series. 6, 7, 8, 9
  • Major complication rates are low (0-2.2%), with minor complications occurring in 3.9-15.5% of cases. 6, 8
  • Hospital stay averages 1-3 days for healthy individuals. 2

Functional Outcomes to Counsel Patient

Erectile dysfunction occurs in approximately 80% of men after radical prostatectomy, compared with 45% with watchful waiting, representing a 35% absolute increase in risk. 2

Urinary incontinence (any leakage) develops in about 49% of men after radical prostatectomy versus 21% with watchful waiting, an absolute increase of 28%. 2

  • Nerve-sparing techniques are recommended when pre-operative MRI shows the tumor is confined and neurovascular bundles are uninvolved, improving the chance of preserving potency. 2
  • Preserving maximal urethral length beyond the prostate apex and avoiding injury to the distal sphincter markedly reduces postoperative incontinence. 2
  • At 12 months post-RARP, 81.5-92.8% of patients use ≤1 pad per day for urinary control. 8, 9
  • Recovery of erectile function is strongly influenced by patient age at surgery, pre-operative erectile status, and extent of cavernous nerve preservation. 2

Oncologic Outcomes with RARP for High-Risk Disease

In elderly patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent RARP:

  • Biochemical recurrence-free survival was 91% at 12 months and 86% at 36 months in one series of 69 patients ≥70 years with high-risk features. 9
  • Biochemical recurrence occurred in 17.4% of patients at median follow-up of 37.7 months. 9
  • Extraprostatic extension with negative margins occurred in 39.1%, and organ-confined disease with negative margins in 37.7%. 9

However, these outcomes remain inferior to radiation-based regimens for high-risk disease. 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not proceed to surgery without histologic confirmation; PI-RADS 5 lesions have a non-negligible false-positive rate despite high cancer detection rates. 3

Skipping staging imaging can lead to inappropriate surgery in the presence of metastatic disease; such patients should receive systemic therapy (ADT plus abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide). 3

Brachytherapy monotherapy is contraindicated for high-risk disease (Gleason ≥8 or PSA >20 ng/mL). 3

When adverse pathological features are present after surgery (pT3, positive margins, Gleason 8-10), adjuvant radiation reduces biochemical recurrence, local recurrence, and clinical progression. 2, 3

Age Considerations

At 57 years of age, this patient is an excellent candidate for definitive therapy:

  • Younger or healthier men (<65 years or >10 year life expectancy) are more likely to experience cancer control benefits from prostatectomy than older men. 1
  • Radical prostatectomy is recommended for patients with an estimated life expectancy of at least 10 years, given the peri-operative morbidity and long-term benefits. 2
  • Older men experience higher rates of permanent erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after prostatectomy compared to younger men, but at 57 this patient has better functional recovery potential. 1

Post-Operative Surveillance

Serum PSA should become undetectable (<0.2 ng/mL) within approximately 2 months after surgery. 2

Early salvage radiotherapy (initiated when PSA is <0.5 ng/mL) provides the greatest chance of biochemical control for recurrent disease. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Radical Prostatectomy Side Effects and Management in Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Pre‑operative Evaluation and Treatment Selection for Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Prostate Specific Antigen Referral Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

[ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR MEN AGE 75 AND OLDER].

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.