Burning Feet Syndrome: Diagnostic Workup and Treatment
Begin with a focused clinical examination to distinguish small-fiber neuropathy (the most common cause of burning feet) from large-fiber or mixed neuropathy, then proceed with a targeted three-test laboratory panel before considering electrodiagnostic studies or skin biopsy.
Initial Clinical Assessment
Characterize the pain pattern and associated symptoms to guide your diagnostic approach:
- Burning pain quality: Pure burning sensation in the feet suggests small-fiber neuropathy, which affects unmyelinated C-fibers involved in pain and temperature perception 1, 2
- Distribution pattern: Symmetric "stocking" distribution beginning in the toes indicates length-dependent polyneuropathy, while asymmetric or patchy involvement suggests vasculitic neuropathy or mononeuritis multiplex 1, 2
- Associated sensory symptoms: Tingling, lancinating pain, and allodynia are "plus" features of small-fiber involvement 1
- Motor symptoms: Weakness, atrophy, or gait instability suggests large-fiber or mixed neuropathy requiring different evaluation 1, 3
- Autonomic features: Orthostatic hypotension (≥20 mmHg systolic or ≥10 mmHg diastolic drop), constipation, bladder dysfunction, or erectile dysfunction indicate autonomic fiber involvement 1, 2
Focused Physical Examination
Perform specific bedside tests to determine fiber-type involvement:
Small-Fiber Function Assessment
- Pinprick testing: Decreased pain perception in areas of burning pain is characteristic of small-fiber neuropathy 1
- Temperature sensation: Use cold tuning fork or temperature discrimination testing 1, 3
- Note: Conventional reflexes and vibration sense remain normal in pure small-fiber neuropathy 1, 2
Large-Fiber Function Assessment
- Vibration testing: Use 128-Hz tuning fork at the great toe—most sensitive bedside test for large-fiber dysfunction 3, 2
- Proprioception: Test joint position sense at the great toe 3
- Ankle reflexes: Reduced or absent reflexes suggest large-fiber involvement 1, 3
- 10-g monofilament: Test multiple plantar sites to detect loss of protective sensation 1, 3
Red Flags Requiring Urgent Evaluation
- Asymmetric distribution: Suggests vasculitis, mononeuritis multiplex, or radiculopathy 1, 2
- Rapid progression: Over weeks to months warrants urgent workup 2
- Motor weakness or atrophy: Indicates need for electrodiagnostic studies 3, 2
- Gait instability: Wide-based, unsteady gait suggests proprioceptive loss from large-fiber involvement 1, 2
High-Yield Laboratory Screening Panel (Order for All Patients)
These three tests provide the highest diagnostic yield and should be obtained first:
Additional Targeted Laboratory Tests (Based on Clinical Context)
Order selectively based on history and examination findings:
- TSH: Screen for hypothyroidism as a reversible cause 2, 4
- Comprehensive metabolic panel: Assess for chronic kidney disease and uremic neuropathy 2, 4
- HIV serology: Distal symmetric sensory neuropathy occurs in approximately 57% of HIV-infected individuals 2
- Hepatitis B/C serology: Up to 50% of HCV-infected patients develop peripheral neuropathy 4
- ESR/CRP: If vasculitis is suspected based on asymmetric distribution 4
When to Order Electrodiagnostic Studies
Nerve conduction studies are NOT required for typical burning feet syndrome with symmetric distribution and normal strength. 3, 2
Order electrodiagnostic studies only when:
- Symptoms are asymmetric or multifocal 3, 2
- Disease progresses rapidly over weeks to months 2
- Predominant motor weakness or distal muscle atrophy is present 3, 2
- Diagnostic uncertainty persists after clinical and laboratory evaluation 2
Common pitfall: Ordering EMG/NCS for typical diabetic neuropathy with classic stocking-glove distribution adds cost without changing management 3
When to Order Skin Biopsy
Skin biopsy with intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density measurement is the gold standard for diagnosing small-fiber neuropathy when conventional nerve conduction studies are normal. 3, 2, 5
Indications for skin biopsy:
- Burning pain with normal nerve conduction studies (small-fiber neuropathy cannot be detected by conventional NCS) 1, 3, 2
- Clinical suspicion for small-fiber neuropathy with negative initial workup 5, 6
- Skin biopsy is more sensitive than quantitative sudomotor axon testing (QSART) or quantitative sensory testing (QST) 5
Technical note: Punch biopsy from distal leg (10 cm above lateral malleolus) is standard 5, 7
Specific Diagnostic Considerations
Erythromelalgia
If burning pain is accompanied by visible erythema, warmth, and swelling triggered by heat or exercise:
- This represents erythromelalgia, not typical small-fiber neuropathy 1
- Episodes are characteristically relieved by cooling 1
- Approximately 5% have familial (SCN9A gene mutation) form 1
- Requires different management approach focused on trigger avoidance and specific pharmacotherapy 1
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
If patient has recent chemotherapy exposure (platinum compounds, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib, thalidomide):
- Small-fiber neuropathy with burning feet is characteristic of taxanes, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide, and bortezomib 1
- Symptoms typically occur within first 2 months of treatment 1
- "Coasting phenomenon" (worsening after treatment cessation) can occur with platinum drugs and paclitaxel 1
- Conventional nerve conduction studies may be normal in small-fiber predominant CIPN 1
Hand-Foot Syndrome (Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia)
If patient is on specific chemotherapy agents (5-FU, capecitabine, doxorubicin) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors:
- This is a distinct dermatologic toxicity, not peripheral neuropathy 1
- Presents with dysesthesia, burning pain, swelling, and erythema progressing to hyperkeratosis 1
- Requires dose modification and topical management (high-potency steroids, lidocaine) 1
Treatment Algorithm
Step 1: Address Underlying Cause (Disease-Modifying Therapy)
Diabetes mellitus:
- Tight glycemic control prevents or delays neuropathy in type 1 diabetes (Level A evidence) 1, 2, 4
- In type 2 diabetes, improved control modestly slows progression but does not reverse established neuropathy (Level B evidence) 1, 2
Vitamin B12 deficiency:
- Supplement with 2500 mcg daily, especially in metformin-induced neuropathy 4
Hypothyroidism:
- Thyroid hormone replacement 2
Uremic neuropathy:
- Optimize renal replacement therapy 2
Step 2: First-Line Pharmacologic Treatment for Neuropathic Pain
Choose one of these three agents (all have Level A evidence): 1, 3, 2
- Pregabalin: Start 75 mg twice daily, titrate to 150-300 mg twice daily based on response 1
- Duloxetine: Start 30 mg daily for one week, then increase to 60 mg daily 1, 4
- Gabapentin: Start 300 mg at bedtime, titrate to 300-1200 mg three times daily 1
Selection considerations:
- Duloxetine preferred if comorbid depression or anxiety 4
- Pregabalin/gabapentin preferred if renal function is normal and sedation is tolerable 1
- Start low and titrate based on efficacy and tolerability 2
Step 3: Second-Line Agents (If First-Line Fails or Not Tolerated)
- Tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline): Start 10-25 mg at bedtime 1, 2
- Venlafaxine: Alternative SNRI if duloxetine not tolerated 4
- Tramadol: Consider for breakthrough pain 2
Common pitfall: Avoid polypharmacy—optimize one agent before adding another 2
Step 4: Non-Pharmacologic Interventions
- Physical activity: Shown to improve neuropathy symptoms 4
- Foot care education: Daily foot inspections to prevent ulceration in patients with loss of protective sensation 1, 3
- Avoid exacerbating factors: Alcohol, tight footwear, prolonged standing 8
When to Refer to Neurology
Refer promptly when:
- Atypical features present (asymmetric distribution, rapid progression, predominant motor weakness) 3, 2
- Diagnostic uncertainty persists after initial workup 3, 2
- Suspected vasculitis requiring nerve biopsy 2
- Suspected hereditary neuropathy requiring genetic testing 3
- Refractory pain despite optimized first- and second-line therapy 2
Follow-Up and Monitoring
- Serial neurologic examinations every 6 months to assess disease progression 2
- Annual 10-g monofilament testing if loss of protective sensation is documented 1, 3
- Routine repeat EMG/NCS is NOT recommended for stable neuropathy—clinical examination is sufficient 3, 2
- Monitor for medication side effects and adjust treatment accordingly 2