Can S‑1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) be used to treat breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

S-1 (Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil) for Breast Cancer

Yes, S-1 can be used to treat metastatic breast cancer and has demonstrated meaningful clinical activity with a favorable safety profile, particularly in Asian populations, though it is not a first-line standard therapy in most Western guidelines. 1

Evidence for Use in Breast Cancer

Clinical Efficacy Data

  • S-1 demonstrated a 41.7% overall response rate (CR+PR) in a Japanese phase II trial of 108 patients with metastatic breast cancer, with a median survival time of 872 days and low gastrointestinal toxicity. 1

  • A single-center retrospective study showed a 30.4% objective response rate and 50.0% clinical benefit rate, with median time to treatment failure of 10.7 months in 46 patients with metastatic breast cancer. 2

  • S-1 was generally well tolerated with only 4 patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events, suggesting it maintains satisfactory quality of life. 2

Optimal Patient Selection

Patients most likely to benefit from S-1 therapy include those with:

  • Disease-free interval ≥2 years (independent predictor of effectiveness, p=0.035). 2
  • No visceral metastasis or limited visceral disease (higher clinical benefit rate, p=0.032). 2
  • HER2-negative status (significantly higher response rates, p=0.020 for ORR and p=0.045 for CBR). 2
  • No prior capecitabine therapy (higher effectiveness, p=0.049 for ORR and p=0.006 for CBR). 2
  • Use as third-line treatment or earlier (significantly better outcomes, p=0.022 for ORR and p=0.019 for CBR). 2

Site-Specific Activity

  • S-1 showed high clinical benefit rates in local disease (46.2%), lymph nodes (40.7%), bone (42.9%), and lungs/pleura (44.8%), but lower activity in liver metastases (30.0%). 2

Current Guideline Context

Primary Role in Gastric Cancer

  • S-1 is established as standard adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer in Asian populations, where it demonstrated 80.1% vs 70.1% 3-year overall survival after D2 resection (HR 0.68). 3

  • S-1 combined with trastuzumab and cisplatin showed comparable antitumor activity in HER2-positive gastric cancer in the Japanese HERBIS-1 study. 3

Limited Mention in Breast Cancer Guidelines

  • S-1 is not specifically mentioned in major Western breast cancer treatment guidelines (ESMO, ASCO) as a standard option. 3

  • One noninferiority trial in breast cancer used tegafur-uracil (UFT, a related compound) compared to CMF, establishing a framework for oral fluoropyrimidine use, but this does not represent current standard practice. 3

Dosing and Administration

  • Standard dose is 80 mg/m²/day administered orally twice daily (after breakfast and supper) for 28 consecutive days followed by 14-day rest. 1, 4

  • Dose adjustments based on body surface area: BSA <1.25 m² = 80 mg/day; 1.25-1.5 m² = 100 mg/day; ≥1.5 m² = 120 mg/day. 4

  • Pharmacokinetics are similar to continuous IV infusion of 5-FU, with no drug accumulation during consecutive administration. 4

Safety Profile

Common Toxicities (≥Grade 3)

  • Neutropenia: 9.1%
  • Anorexia: 3.6%
  • Fatigue: 2.7%
  • Stomatitis: 1.8%
  • Nausea/vomiting: 1.8%
  • Diarrhea: 0.9%
  • No treatment-related deaths were observed. 1

Age Considerations

  • No difference in response rate or toxicity between patients <65 years and ≥65 years, making it suitable for elderly patients. 1

Clinical Context and Positioning

S-1 should be considered as a later-line option (typically third-line or beyond) for metastatic breast cancer, particularly when:

  • Standard chemotherapy options have been exhausted
  • Patient prefers oral therapy
  • Patient has favorable prognostic factors (long DFI, HER2-negative, no liver metastases)
  • Maintaining quality of life is a priority 2

Important Caveats

  • Most evidence comes from Asian populations, and efficacy in Western patients is less well-established. 3

  • S-1 is primarily used in Japan and other Asian countries where it has regulatory approval for breast cancer; availability may be limited elsewhere. 1

  • For hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, endocrine-based therapy remains the preferred first-line approach unless visceral crisis is present. 5

  • Cross-resistance with capecitabine may occur, as both are oral fluoropyrimidines, though the addition of DPD inhibition in S-1 may provide some benefit. 2

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.