What does MRM stand for in ear disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRM in Ear Disease

MRM stands for Modified Radical Mastoidectomy, a canal wall down surgical procedure used to eradicate chronic middle ear and mastoid disease, particularly chronic suppurative otitis media with cholesteatoma. 1, 2

Surgical Technique and Goals

Modified Radical Mastoidectomy is a definitive surgical approach that removes the posterior and superior canal walls while preserving the tympanic membrane and middle ear structures when possible. 1 The primary objectives are:

  • Complete eradication of disease (cholesteatoma, chronic infection, or mastoiditis) 2, 3
  • Creation of a safe, stable, and self-cleaning mastoid cavity 3, 4
  • Preservation or improvement of hearing when feasible 1, 2

The procedure differs from radical mastoidectomy in that MRM attempts to preserve middle ear structures and hearing function, whereas radical mastoidectomy removes the tympanic membrane and ossicles entirely. 1

Hearing Outcomes

MRM does not worsen hearing and can provide hearing improvement, particularly when combined with type III tympanoplasty. 2, 3 Key factors affecting hearing results include:

  • The presence of an intact stapes superstructure is the major determinant of postoperative air-bone gap closure (p=0.025 preoperatively, p=0.031 postoperatively) 2
  • Primary surgery yields better hearing outcomes than revision procedures 1
  • Average hearing gain of 21.24 dB in air conduction and 15.62 dB closure of air-bone gap when combined with type III tympanoplasty 3
  • No significant worsening of bone conduction thresholds despite extensive drilling 1

Approximately 53% of patients show no improvement in air-bone gap closure, while 25% demonstrate postoperative improvement. 2 However, the procedure consistently avoids creating "dead ears" or causing significant hearing deterioration. 1

Postoperative Course and Cavity Management

The majority of MRM cavities achieve a dry, self-cleaning state, but this requires variable periods of intensive aftercare. 4 The healing timeline follows this pattern:

  • 36% of cavities are stable at 6 months 4
  • 42% achieve stability at 1 year 4
  • 53% are stable at 18 months 4
  • 62% reach stability at 2 years 4
  • Overall, 73-78% of patients ultimately achieve a dry ear 2, 4

Important caveat: Even after achieving initial stability, 23% of cavities require further clinical intervention, sometimes after prolonged quiescent periods. 4 This necessitates long-term follow-up, with patients making an average of 632 total visits beyond the two standard postoperative appointments. 4

Disease Control and Recurrence

MRM provides excellent disease control with only a 3% recurrence rate. 2 The procedure is particularly effective for:

  • Chronic active otitis media with cholesteatoma 2, 3
  • Chronic mastoiditis 2
  • "End-stage" chronic otitis media with persistent infection despite prior treatment 5

For patients with retained infected residual cell tracts causing persistent disease, radical revision mastoidectomy (RRM) with exenteration of all residual cells and mastoid obliteration achieves an 80% dry ear rate. 5

Clinical Context and Patient Selection

MRM is particularly valuable in populations with limited access to follow-up care, as it provides maximum benefit in a single-stage procedure. 3 The technique offers:

  • Reproducible and relatively safe surgical access 1
  • No requirement for revision surgery in most cases 4
  • Effective management of extensive disease in tertiary referral populations 1

Common pitfall: Inadequate removal of residual cell tracts or creation of a meatus that is too small are the most frequent causes of surgical failure. 5 Complete exenteration of all mastoid, middle ear cleft, perilabyrinthine, and peri-Eustachian tube cell tracts is essential for optimal outcomes. 5

References

Research

Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 1996

Research

Modified Radical Mastoidectomy with Type III Tympanoplasty: Revisited.

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.