Drug-Coated Balloons: Indications, Contraindications, and Management
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are guideline-endorsed for in-stent restenosis following both bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, but are NOT recommended for de novo coronary lesions; in peripheral arterial disease, DCBs should be considered first-line for femoropopliteal lesions but show no benefit in below-the-knee disease, and all paclitaxel-coated devices carry an FDA warning regarding possible increased long-term mortality. 1, 2, 3
Appropriate Patient and Lesion Types
Coronary Artery Disease
In-stent restenosis (ISR):
- DCBs are the Class I, Level A guideline recommendation for treating ISR after both bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents. 1 The mechanism works optimally in the contained environment of ISR where the existing stent scaffold prevents elastic recoil. 1
- Network meta-analyses demonstrate that DCBs avoid adding another layer of metal in previously failed stents, which is particularly important in recurrent ISR. 1
- DCBs are a reasonable alternative when additional stent layers are undesirable. 2
De novo coronary lesions:
- The European Society of Cardiology explicitly does NOT recommend DCBs for de novo coronary lesions (no Class I recommendation). 1 Without a scaffold to prevent elastic recoil, DCBs have inferior acute results compared to stenting in de novo disease. 1
- The American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology prioritize drug-eluting stents over alternative strategies for de novo disease. 1
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal lesions:
- Drug-eluting treatment should be considered as first-choice strategy for femoropopliteal lesions. 1 Early European studies showed improved short-term patency rates with DCBs compared to plain balloon angioplasty. 1
- Multiple prospective randomized trials demonstrated significantly improved patency when compared to conventional balloon angioplasty. 3, 2
Below-the-knee disease:
- DCBs have shown NO superiority over plain balloon angioplasty in below-the-knee disease. 1 Drug-eluting balloons and bare metal stent implantation show no benefit over plain balloon angioplasty in infra-popliteal lesions. 1
Dialysis Access Maintenance
Arteriovenous fistula/graft stenosis:
- DCBs coated with paclitaxel have demonstrated significantly improved patency rates compared to conventional balloon angioplasty in multiple prospective randomized trials. 3, 2
- Clinical success rates show cumulative patency at 6-month (primary) of 38% to 63% and 12-month (primary) of 23% to 44%. 3
- However, KDOQI guidelines state there is inadequate evidence to recommend drug-coated balloons versus standard high-pressure balloons for arteriovenous fistula/graft stenosis. 1, 3 More research is needed in this area. 3
Contraindications
Absolute Contraindications
- Inability to tolerate or comply with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). 3 Patients who cannot take DAPT should not receive DCB treatment in coronary applications.
- De novo coronary lesions where guideline-directed therapy calls for drug-eluting stents. 1
Relative Contraindications
- Anticipated surgery requiring discontinuation of DAPT within the recommended timeframe. 3 For coronary applications, this creates significant risk.
- High risk of bleeding that would preclude appropriate antiplatelet therapy. 3
- Below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease where DCBs show no benefit over conventional angioplasty. 1
Critical FDA Safety Warning
On January 17,2019, the FDA issued a warning letter about a possible increase in long-term mortality rates among patients with peripheral artery disease treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons and paclitaxel-eluting stents when compared to patients treated with control devices. 3, 1, 2
- The FDA allows continued use but mandates discussion of risks and benefits with patients, including possible increased mortality risk. 3, 1, 2
- Continued surveillance is required for all paclitaxel-coated device use. 1
- This warning applies to peripheral applications; coronary ISR data did not show similar mortality signals. 3
Recommended Inflation Duration and Pressure
Inflation Duration
The optimal duration of balloon inflation time during angioplasty to improve intervention primary patency remains an area requiring more evidence. 3 Current guidelines identify this as a research gap rather than providing specific recommendations.
Practical approach based on device characteristics:
- Most DCB protocols use 60-120 seconds of inflation time to allow adequate drug transfer to the vessel wall. 4, 5
- Adequate lesion preparation before DCB inflation is critical—the vessel must be optimally dilated with conventional or high-pressure balloons first. 4, 5, 6
- A single prolonged inflation is the standard technique to deliver antiproliferative drugs to local arterial tissue. 5
Inflation Pressure
- Use nominal pressure or slightly above to ensure adequate vessel wall contact without causing dissection. 4, 5
- High-pressure balloons (>20 atm) should be used for lesion preparation before DCB application, not for the DCB itself. 3
- The goal is drug delivery, not aggressive mechanical dilation—that should already be accomplished during preparation. 4, 5
Post-Procedure Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Regimen
Coronary Applications (In-Stent Restenosis)
Standard DAPT duration:
- For acute coronary syndrome patients: 12 months of aspirin (75-100 mg daily) plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel). 7 This applies regardless of whether DCB or drug-eluting stent was used for ISR treatment.
- For stable coronary artery disease: 6 months of DAPT is the default duration. 7
- After completing DAPT, continue aspirin 75-100 mg daily indefinitely. 7
P2Y12 inhibitor selection:
- In ACS, ticagrelor (180 mg loading, 90 mg twice daily) is preferred over clopidogrel. 7
- Prasugrel (60 mg loading, 10 mg daily) is acceptable in ACS patients without prior stroke/TIA. 7
- For stable CAD, clopidogrel 75 mg daily is the default. 7
Modified duration for high bleeding risk:
- High bleeding-risk ACS patients may shorten DAPT to 6 months. 7
- High bleeding-risk stable CAD patients may shorten DAPT to 3 months. 7
- Absolute minimum is 1 month of DAPT for any coronary intervention. 7
Peripheral Arterial Disease Applications
For PAD revascularization with DCB:
- The American College of Cardiology recommends DAPT for 2-6 months after DCB procedure for PAD revascularization, based on 2024 ACC/AHA guidelines. 2
- This is shorter than coronary applications because peripheral vessels have different thrombotic risk profiles.
Dialysis Access Applications
For arteriovenous fistula/graft treatment:
- Standard antiplatelet therapy recommendations for dialysis access procedures apply. 3
- Specific DAPT duration for DCB use in dialysis access is not well-established in guidelines. 3
Bleeding Mitigation Strategies
- Prescribe a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) to all patients on DAPT to reduce gastrointestinal bleeding risk. 7
- Maintain low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg daily); higher doses provide no additional benefit and increase bleeding. 7
- Use radial artery access for coronary procedures whenever feasible to reduce access-site bleeding. 7
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Inadequate lesion preparation:
- The most common error is applying DCB without optimal pre-dilation. 4, 5 Always achieve adequate vessel dilation with conventional or high-pressure balloons before DCB application—residual stenosis >30% predicts DCB failure. 4, 5
Using DCB for inappropriate indications:
- Do not use DCB for de novo coronary lesions where drug-eluting stents are guideline-recommended. 1 The lack of scaffold support leads to inferior outcomes.
- Do not use DCB for below-the-knee PAD where no benefit has been demonstrated. 1
Premature DAPT discontinuation:
- Never stop both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor simultaneously except in life-threatening bleeding. 7 If DAPT must be shortened, stop the P2Y12 inhibitor first while maintaining aspirin to avoid catastrophic stent thrombosis (mortality 20-40%). 7
Failing to discuss FDA mortality warning:
- For peripheral applications, document discussion of the FDA warning about possible increased long-term mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices. 3, 1, 2 This is a medicolegal requirement.
Inadequate follow-up: